Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 103562.jpg (63KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 600x600px
>i7 7700k has a stock turbo of 4.5Ghz and siliconlottery puts a little over half of units as being able to hit 5.0Ghz
>I7 6900k has a stock turbo of 3.8 Ghz, google searches show 4.5Ghz as a common overclock
>R7 1800X has a stock turbo of 4.0Ghz, every reviewer seems to have an 'overclock' of 4.0 or 4.1 Ghz
What gives? Even Bulldozer could be pushed harder than this.
>>
File: 1453301370050.jpg (126KB, 1095x662px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 1095x662px
>>59252456
unmatured 14nm gloflo process, brand new architecture, rushed out the door. a lot of reasons
bulldozer was 32nm hkmg, this isnt compariable at all.
>>
I build gaming PCs for a living. Most people do not overclock, even with suites that do it for you.
>>
>>59252608
I browse 4chan for a living, most people here are factually wrong. Even when proven wrong.
>>
File: 1488582463204.png (60KB, 160x165px) Image search:
[Google]
60KB, 160x165px
>>59252608
Those are the kind of people that have someone else build a PC for them though
>>
>>59252573
>the salt shakers are clearly see-through (there are green dots coming out of the technology shaker)
>when the autism shaker's cap pops off and autism starts flooding into the bowl the shaker's content doesn't decrease
is /g/ comprised of infinite autism?
>>
>>59252608
what does this have to do with the thread? kill yourself nigger
>>
File: 1487270514081.jpg (22KB, 416x405px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 416x405px
>>59252756
>infinite autism
Yes.
>>59252456
The R7 series is just a budget 6900k. I wonder if it could clock better if they made it a higher wattage chip though.
>there will never be a 6.0 Ghz R7 1900X 9590 successor
>>
>>59252639
I run WinRAR and Cinebench for a living. Most of the real world does to, time to grow up gaymen.
>>
>>59252608
Overclocking is not worth the cost for most CPUs.
>Pay $50+ premium for an OC board
>Pay $50+ premium for a highend cooler
>Pay $30+ premium for a larger PSU
>Pay $20+ per year premium in power cost
All for some 200 MHz extra.
The last time when you got decent gains for OCing was during the Core 2 era 10 years ago where you could raise your clock rate by 50% on air coolers.
>>
>>59253042
it's doubtful that amd is going to make one of those 220W atrocities ever again
>>
>>59253194
Everything after Faildozer and Sandy Meme is not worth it in OC.
>>
>>59253271
Why is that? Is it because of the smaller cpus?
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4