What the fuck is wrong with Ryzen? It's like it performs

Amd still thinking "MOAR CORES" when they need to be thinking "better single threaded performance"

>>59220809
Motherboards and BIOS are a fucking mess right now.

>>59220870
>they really believe in this bullshit

>>59220818
vastly exceeding 40% ipc over bulldozer and coming within 10% ipc of kabylake on a brand new gen 1 aechitecture isn't enough. god i love dumb people as an endless source of comedy gold

>>59220809
>What the fuck is wrong with Ryzen?
What the fuck ISN'T wrong with Ryzen?

>muh memory bug
>muh optimization
>muh bios/uefi
>muh optimization
>muh intel shilling
wow it's bulldozer 2.0 in here lol

>>59221080
Performance in highly threaded workloads.

>>59221112
Literally Bulldozer 2: Electric Pooinloo

>>59221070
>coming within 10% ipc of kabylake

Wew lad, now if it only had cycles.

>>59221070
>vastly exceeding 40% ipc over bulldozer and coming within 10% ipc of kabylake on a brand new gen 1 aechitecture isn't enough. god i love dumb people as an endless source of comedy gold
>within 10% of kaby lake
>also clocked 15% lower
>everyone else is dumb because while it's still shit it's better than their previous failure cpu
hmm really activated my almonds, being dumb sure sucks, oh well i guess i'll go use my faster better computer which cost me less money overall and play games on higher framerates

>Bulldozer was supposed to be a clock speed monster running at 5+GHz out of the box to make up for its weak IPC
>problems with manufacturing arise, forcing them to stay on 32nm and drastically lowering clock speeds to keep power consumption in check
>low single-threaded performance is the result, even at housefire-tier overclocks

>Ryzen is the complete opposite, designed for IPC and scaleability instead of stupid high clocks
>in the meantime Intel has made CPUs that can hit 5GHz with relative ease with similar IPC
>AMD once again falls flat in single-threaded performance

How can one company be THIS incompetent and not go bankrupt?

>>59220809
Is AMD selling really bad silicon?

File: 1476467724416.jpg (21KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x300px

>>59221168
>Electric Pooinloo

>>59220809
He needs a firmware update
Even then we'll see
Laugh now humans
Probably best value cpu on market
Might be the beat cpu ever
Ever
!

File: 1475031368352.jpg (12KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 184x184px

>>59220809
Its AMD's fault, goyim. Buy Intel™

>Write controllers to over-perform on one particular popular benchmark
>Performs poorly on another
This is an oversimplification, of course, but you're naive if you think processor-making companies aren't specifically targeting features to perform well on benchmarks rather than to perform well in general.