Why is everyone claiming that Intel is better than Ryzen in gaming?

>let me cherry pick this one sourceless graph when 90% of reviews and user benchmarks show that the 7700k is better for gaming

File: tombraider.png (27KB, 733x707px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 733x707px

>>59219553
Even your cherry picked review shows Intel is faster

Look at all the reviews around the net, they show the same thing, Ryzen is awful for gaming.

>>59219583
>Even your cherry picked review shows Intel is faster
This is why I love that graph

>>59219565
>watchdogs 2
>at 1080p with a GTX 1080
>72 and 76 FPS
This is complete and utter bullshit, both the Ryzen and the intel perform better at that game

>>59219583
from guru3d:
>We reiterate, game performance is not yet where it needs to be in 1080P. This is something that might be fixed with firmware and software updates as the per core performance that Ryzen offers simply can do it.
>the per core performance that Ryzen offers simply can do it
Every review, including guru3d, is acknowledging ryzen's per core performance is much better than the fail game benchmarks indicate. You're literally retarded ro be taking these at face value. No, this isn't bulldozer 2.0, that architecture had shit tier IPC performance where ryzen doesn't.

>>59219787
it says minimum fps can't you read?

>>59219553
It's better though ryzen is better in some but the next generation of Zen should beat Intel decidedly wth their anemic gains. The only blunder is lack of 10 core and intel's is rudicously priced. Anyway AMD is finally competitive.