Why is the 7700k incapable of competing in 4k games? Wasn't

At 4k the full bandwidth of the chip is used, clockspeed matters very little as it's a throughput test instead of a clockspeed test.

>7700k
>"serious" gaming CPU
>worthless in multithreaded workloads compared to even a regular 1700
>4 cores use as much power as Zen 8 cores while being 60% or more slower in multithreaded
>can't even compete in highres gaming

What's the point of this chip? To OC it to 5.3GHz so you can run 800x600 at 3000FPS instead of 2759?

>>59217949
Clearly you don't gaym at 253hz on your Gsync monitor. Go have sex with women, you fucking normie Chad.

Intel reslets on suicide watch.

Meanwhile Ryzen is

>faster in high res gaming
>just as fast as a $1000 Intel chip outside of gaming
>costs half as much while using less power


Contemplate suicide, kikes.

>Intel is better at running 2006 laptop monitors

Nothing new here.

File: 1488550547210.jpg (148KB, 680x486px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 680x486px

>>59217855

>>59217855
intelkike wasted money to buy they x99 board and game at 800x640

>>59218319
Intelkikes don't have money for a 6900k, they have a 7700k with 800x600 $30 monitors

So from what I got from this.


if you're playing on 1080, get a 7700k.
if you're playing on 4k, get a Ryzen.