Could machine learning be used to identify pedophiles based on SFW web browsing pattern?
Specifically, even if the pedophile is only browsing SFW sites, could there be a statistical difference in their browsing pattern compared to normal people?
Could employers use machine learning software to identify possible pedophiles among their employees who could expose them to both regulatory and PR risks (e.g. the Google engineer who was looking at private NSFW selfies of lolis stored Google's cloud storage) and fire them preemptively?
Yes. If you hate Microsoft because they created software to check for child porn in pictures being stored on their server and think that is an invasion of your privacy, you are most likely a pedophile.
>>59210563
No, I'm trying to see if I could pitch a software that could be sold to companies that would identify potentially risk employees based on various metadata.
One big area of interest is possible sex offenders, especially against children.
>>59210472
>Could employers use machine learning software to identify possible pedophiles among their employees who could expose them to both regulatory and PR risks (e.g. the Google engineer who was looking at private NSFW selfies of lolis stored Google's cloud storage) and fire them preemptively?
This is already happening, apparently facebook has a "creep flag" which is 0 if you have a "normal" online behavior, and 1 if you're continuosly stalking someone underaged, and so on. It's not available to the general public yet, it's just an automatic email only service provided to a handfull of high profile companies and ofcourse protected by various nda's. Basically you send a list of fb profiles to an obfuscated email address and you get back the same list but with a 0 or 1 at the end of every name. Publicly they sit on this for now because it would create a media shitstorm, but they will release it at the right moment, they're just looking for the right excuse\context. Reddit does this too but in a more rudimentary way.
they already have tests where they hook a thing to your dick to see how hard it is and then show you hardcore child porn
>>59210753
>90% of people flagged by Facebook's algo are grandmas looking at her grandchildren's photos
>>59210472
How can such an attractive man have such tiny nostrils?
>>59210773
Employers can't make their employees wear the erection hardness measuring devices, but they are allowed to monitor web browsing activities.
>>59210472
>wanting to work with the man
>>59210795
Because they're for another man with tiny hands to pick.
>>59210795
Pure blood Aryan
>>59210852
>Brown eyes
Even if you argue that it may be aryan (it isn't) it's a feminine trait.
Pence is a cute. CUTE!
>>59210795
Septum damage from excessive cocaine use
>>59210472
Thought crime needs to stop dear god.
>>59210753
add source please
>>59210472
Reminder that "anti-pedo" is just codeword for feminist. Age of consent used to be 8 till feminists demanded it be raised.
>>59210784
Kek
>>59211002
>Age of consent used to be 8 till feminists demanded it be raised.
No it wasn't. Also
>1885
>feminists
>>59211130
It was 150 years ago till feminists got mad that nobody wanted disgusting harpies like them and increased it.