Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
QUESTION OF NUCLEAR IMPORTANCE : In all the tests i'm reading, NONE, absolutely NONE, tests the 1800x past 3.9-4GHz, when the boost clock is supposed to be 4GHz. WHERE THE FUCK IS XFR, WHERE THE FUCK IS OC POTENTIAL IN THE TESTS ? WAS EVERYONE PAID BY INTEL TO MAKE THE TESTS ? In SO MANY TESTS, you see the 1800x at 3.9GHz, next to 6900k at turbo clock, THEN OCED PAST TURBO TO LIKE 4.4GHZ. WHY NOBODY IS SHOWING THE 4.4GHZ 1800X IN ACTION, ITS THE REASON WERE FUCKING BUYING THE 1800X, FOR THE BEST BINNED OC CHIPS
>>
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
File: 1488426261536.jpg (5KB, 160x160px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 160x160px
AAAAAAAHHHHHHH
>>
File: oijhazfa.gif (104KB, 300x136px) Image search:
[Google]
104KB, 300x136px
CAN SOMEONE LINK A FUCKING TEST SHOWING OCED 1800X OR 1700X, THE JEWS PAID TOP RANKS REVIEWERS NOT TO REVIEW THE 1800X PAST 3.9GHZ
>>
File: 11136766_10153299766929127_6304523083626504865_n.jpg (41KB, 640x558px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 640x558px
>>59199447
>ITT: Autist needs to figure out whether to go through with his preorder
>>
>>59199664
It's really astonishing though.
No doubt, for a poweruser Ryzen is a top deal, anything that compares in workload app are double the price. However, for deciding between the 1700,1700x or 1800x, which are basically the same chip, I'd be cool to see how far can a 1800x go in OC, it's goddamn why we're throwing an additionnal 100$ for. Why toss 100$ more if it wont go beyond 4GHz on air/water
so I DEMAND a test with XFR WATERCOOLING, to see how it behaves
>>
>>59199765
Completely agree
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4