>get excited over all the Ryzen hype >"wow, a fast,

still cheaper than a 6900k

>>59195408
Stop being poor you poorfag. Compared to jewtel its crazy affordable prices. And ryzen 5 will be even more affordable.

>>59195433

I don't want shitty Ryzen 5, I want Ryzen 7 like everyone else

>>59195439
I think 5 will be more popular than 7. Similar to how everyone recommends i5 over i7.

>>59195408
>gen 1 i5
youre gonna have to pay extra to upgrade to anything you fucking nigger retard

File: ryzen-doa.jpg (386KB, 1301x739px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1301x739px

>>59195408
Ryzen is shit, you made the right choice

>ranting about the cost to upgrade to new platform when skylake basically do the same thing
>No one complaining
Damn....

Plus $110 for new Windows 10 key

>>59195863
Yeah, too bad that Skylake and Kaby Lake have motherboards at half the price.

>>59195882
>Plus $110 for new Windows 10 key
you can transfer license to new hardware with MS account

>>59195931
z270 is more expensive than x370 boards.
why do you lie about things everyone can check in a second?

>>59195675

Looks pretty good considering none of those games use more than 4 cores and are rather old.

Bioshock infinite specifically is a 5 year old game that uses 2 cores and is clockspeed dependent, so that's cool.

I don't know how you thought IPC was going to magically go way above skylake, anywho.

The whole point is you get 8 cores and 16 threads with good IPC for a ridiculously low price of 329$, cheap but well put together motherboards and newer I/O etc.

games that use 8 threads (DICE), some UE4, and crytek games, should equal the 7700k's performance. Not to mention you will still have 8 other threads for other shit!

>>59195675
>BUT MUH GAYMS

>>59195994
kek

>>59195675
literally the same person posting the same image where it shows how 1700X has 95% of the performance of the i7 6950x for 50% of the
price.

kek.

>>59195675
>cherry picked old games
>the only difference that matters is 20fps in one of them
damn shills are getting out of steam

File: 1400956733827.jpg (12KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 251x242px

>>59195994
>Ryzen is looking good guys
>I know what, let's start shilling for AMD and throw in Raja and his GPUs as well
>Meanwhile in reality AMD's GPU are shit, got outsold 10 to 1 by Pascal and all they were going for is better dx12 performance which is also history now that Nvidia announced dx12 driver update that boosts their performance by 15% on average
>few months from now on AMD will once again be an overhyped laughing stock cause of few retarded shills that keep posting shit like this
>You will deny all of it

I fucking hate the community I'm sharing my hardware with.

>>59196025
kys nigger

>>59195982
Z270 127€, X370 158€. Nice try idiot. The cheapest B350 is fucking 99€, while the cheapest B150 is 50€.

>>59196009
Actually this picture says a lot. Higher resolutions mean jack shit in this scenario because those Iranian poorfags used a 980 GTX in their benchmarks. Those 1080p scores are even because of a GPU bottleneck which means 1700X is at least good enough to stop bottlenecking a mid range card like 480 or 1060.

Lower resolutions where GPU had way more room to breathe show how behind Ryzen is, or what would happen if you actually had a 1080 Ti or 1080 paired with those CPUs.

>>59196006
Actually, that's quite facetious as well.

The 1700X is the 400$ mid-range Ryzen CPU, and the 6950x is a 1500$ CPU...

That's 3.75x more expensive for 5% more performance on average

Not to mention a Quad channel kit and socket 2011-v3 will be another 600$

You can literally buy a Ryzen 1700X CPU-Based system for the price of one 6950x.

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/cyberpowerpc-gamer-master-desktop-amd-ryzen-7-16gb-memory-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-120gb-ssd-1tb-hard-drive-black/5781149.p?skuId=5781149

or far less for the 1700 8GB RAM and a cheaper GPU, which happens to be the 6900k's price tag (although I don't know why you would want to only get 8gb of RAM)

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883230196&cm_re=AMD_Ryzen-_-83-230-196-_-Product

Anyone trying to downplay the importance of this is laughable

>>59196006
Yeah, and it also shows that it has 95% of the performance of 4770K that was $50 cheaper at launch and launched Q2'13.

>>59195974
Does the free upgrade version qualify for this, ie. I had windows 7 before, and did the free upgrade?

>>59196074


In a single threaded workload, that's true! Congratulations for pointing that out! No one else would have guessed that :P

I N T E L

B T F O

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-delivered-early-benchmarks/

>>59195408
i wonder who could be behind this post

>>59196025
this is not a community retarded piece of shit, go back to /leddit/

>>59196077
it should, it's normal license as far as I know

>>59195675
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-delivered-early-benchmarks/

>Keep posting that image and people might believe you.

>>59196348
How much are you willing to bet that it won't be that good, shill?

File: 1476833512736.gif (2MB, 237x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 237x240px

>>59196025
>community
Back to lereddit, dumb commie libshit nigger.

>>59196025
Stupid nigger.