If youre under the age of 35 programming/web dev/comp sci are

Right. But who will PROGRAM the robots?

Gotta think mafriendo

What about IT support and administration?

>>59193923
Other robots

>>59193912

you cant even explain how thats going to go down or happen dumbass

>>59193923
People actually want to get rid of old devs because they refuse to learn new shit, the only thing keeping them employed are old-ass systems that need a maintainer.

File: xHUQq2Q.jpg (63KB, 636x448px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 636x448px

>2017
>not becoming a plumber and moving to India
The demand is almost infinite, you'll never be replaced by a robot.

>>59193954
?
the demand is almost zero...

>>59193937
IT support is over saturated and pay is very low

File: Narendra_Modi_Reuters11.jpg (22KB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 380x285px

>>59193962
Modi promised a toilet in every home. Politicians would never lie.

>>59193975
There is a toilet in every home. No-one uses them, they prefer the street

So there's no plumbing work.

>>59193912
>Youll be replaced by a robot within 15 years.
Who's going to program the robots?
Other robots?
Sounds recursive to me.

>>59193912
Got a job at the county that I thought was supposed to by systems administration, but all I do is go to meetings.

The pay is pretty amazing (122k) and the retirement is nuts, but man my skills are deteriorating.

How to fix india:
Put toilets in the streets.

>>59193944
Ai will be advanced and cheap by then. I didnt think it required explanation dumbass

>>59194066
Yes other robots

>>59194089

ok so i guess ill be living on mars in 5 year sanyway cause space travel will be cheap by then

i dont think this statement requires any explanation

>>59194044
Fine then. Become a street sweeper and move to India.

>>59194115
Technology grows exponentially. The worlds fastest computer in 2002 could be fit in a single processor. The phone in your pocket is faster than the supercomputers of the 90s. By 2032 AI will be able to do almost everything humans can do, for a fraction of the cost

>>59194187
A logistic function would be a better fit. We are reaching the carrying capacity threshold with microprocessor transistors being so small they are at the edge of quantum mechanics.

>>59194187

>IT JUST HAPPENS AND EVERY PERSON WORKING ON ANY SOFTWARE WILL BE OBSOLETE

uhhmm nooooo?!

More Computing power always opens up new possibilities, new ways of doing things.

Fucking idiots lmao. The scaling and possibilities are endless - and you will always need people who actually DO stuff.

All these AI, Robot memes are fucking cringey and ridiculous. It reminds me off how people in the 1950s thought the year 2000 is the year of space travel, aliens and flying cars.

There are also so many legal, legislatory, regulatory, ethical, moral questions involved this wont be a fast process.

I'd say the scare mongering faggots can postpone their memes for another 50 or even 100 years and then we are talking about actual issues related to AI, Robotics and the place humanity has for (((them)))

>>59194225
> you will always need people who actually DO stuff.
feild worker upon hearing of the cotton gin
> you will always need people who actually DO stuff.
Detroit auto worker upon hearing of automated assembly
> you will always need people who actually DO stuff.
Early 90s phone operator after hearing an automated operator
> you will always need people who actually DO stuff.
You

>Youll be replaced by a robot within 15 years.

This is true for ANY job, name one job that can't theoretically be replaced by a robot

>>59193912
>tfw theoretical physicist
>tfw no way my job will be replaced by robots

>>59194307
>feild worker upon hearing of the cotton gin
What's funny is instead of curbing slavery like the abolitionist Eli Whitney was hoping ("muh automation will destroy the jobs slaves do"), the cotton gin actually expanded the need for slavery in the Southern United States.

>>59194315
Pastor.

>>59194089
OK fampai, how is this AI going to work?
Let me guess, you know nothing about machine learning and your idea of a neural network is a bunch of circles pointing to other circles.

File: futurama_01_0109_robotology_640x360.jpg (156KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 640x360px

>>59194334

>>59194315
Minister. Bartender

>>59194338
Im not sure what youre asking. Are you asking me to explain what artificial intelligence is?

>>59194307

not an answer or any argument lol

Im not arguing against a shift in what people will do - this will always happen.

Im just saying there will always be something that can be done and will be done.

We moved from a farming to industrial society and then to a service oriented society/economy.

This just happens. There is also absolutely no way that you can predict what X change in technology will do and what the outcome will be for the world cause if you could you wouldnt shitpost on 4chan you'd be a billionaire who can predict the future.

Nobody predicted the iPhones impact in 2003 or 2004 but when it came and the time was right for it a new way of accessing technology of all kind was born and it happened really fast and it produced trillions of wealth and millions of new jobs and still does grow faster than anything else.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (115KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1280x720px

>>59194360

>>59194379
Most people dont go to vars for just the alcohol. Usually its to socialize. A good bartender is a long way from being replaced

You're more likely to have your job outsourced to Europe. Developers are cheap in portugal, poland, demark, etc. and they're actually decent compared to the POO IN THE LOOs. It's either that or they'll be a glut of code bootcamp grads forcing down wages.

Anyhow just make sure you're saving as much money as possible and try to buy a house in fly over land before the crash.

>>59194387

I've never been to a bar that was so slow that you can actually have a meaningful conversation with the bartender.

>>59194378

>Im not arguing against a shift in what people will do - this will always happen.
Then why are you arguing at all. That was the entire thesis to my post you fucking faggot

>>59194401
Sounds shitty

>>59194411

Maybe for an autist like you

>>59194368
>I'm going to make outrageous claims using definite year ranges, but provide no evidence except for the simple assumption that the "future is going to be more advanced"
Where are my fucking flying cars?
Did you think we were going to put jet engines on the sides of every Toyota shitbox?

>>59194415
How does wanting to talk make me autistic? Thats literally the opposite

>>59194425
>Where are my fucking flying cars?
We have flying machines. Theyre just really expensive to produce and not marketable because of federal regulation
>Where are my fucking flying cars?
Id hardly call the advancement of technology an outrageous claim

>all these booty blasted comp sci majors

>>59194403

>That was the entire thesis to my post you fucking faggot

yeah know .. its like "HURR DURR ITS A WASTE VERYONE GETS BTFO ENJOY FOODSTAMPS BRAH XDD!!!!"

which isnt true because people who are succesful at X will also succesfully adapt to Y especiall in a service type of economy and especially true for any CS , computer science, programming type of shit because the meta shifts on a yearly basis and oyu have to learn and adopt to stay in the game anyway from year to year lol

The only thing that can happen is that some big giant companies go out of business but thats not a problem with career choices in 2017 in general you fucking dumb autist.

See you on Mars in 5 years.

>>59194316
>a being smarter than me
>i-i wont be replaced

>>59194315
Artist. Athlete.

>>59194528
people who are succesful at X will also succesfully adapt to Y
Ya im sure all the people already doing Y are just going to step down for some fat code monkey

File: Patrick-Tresset-2-300dpi-12-X-8-.jpg (87KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1000x667px

>>59194555

>>59194602

Y doesnt EXIST YET FUCKING HELL

What about all the people who work on all these smartphones now?!

Were they born after 2010?!?!

>>59194603
That's it. We're fucked

>>59193912
whatever you say

>>59193912

Simply not true. 39yr old SWE here.
You always need to stay relevant and can't just be a heads-down code monkey with Linkin Park tshirt.

>>59194547
>implying theoretical physicists actually do work
have you even taken a look at string theory?
i mean, i imagine computers would do an excellent job sitting around all day too, just unplug it!

>>59193912
I'll have enough to retire after 10 years.

>>59194401
Fucking idiot bars are generally empty during the week.

>>59194443
All right then, within five years the polar ice caps are going to melt because of climate change
huehuehue

>>59194603
Point is, it doesn't make human artists any less appreciated.

>implying people will be able to install wordpress to fill a printer in 15 years
We all know that isnt going to happen.

>>59195996
*or know how to fill a printer

>>59194066
Hire r&d to make a robot to replace programers

> Machine learning is the baby step,then neural networks insert other buzzwords

You now have a robot programing robotz

>>59194187
This is the thought process that said we would have flying cars in the year 2000, but I don't see shit, do you?

>>59194836
Lol no you wont. No way you make 7 figures a year

>>59196249
See
>>59194443

>>59193912
the engineers that program the robots will still have a job

it will be a long ass time before we have a AI smart enough to program other AI without human interverntion

>>59197879
Not as long as people think. Tech grows exponentially

Funny you should post this OP. I just finished reading Our final invention by James Baraat. I think 15 is a bit aggressive. Well definitely see the bubble start to burst in 20; I think a fairer estimate is it will be fully popped and well have to institute UBI by 2050. You must have read that article by Masatashi Son (probably misspelled, my memory is terribly for nip names) on futurism. I found his predictions to be wayyy too aggressive. No way automated cars will dominate the roads in less than two years. Thats just fucking foolish

>>59193912
What a disgusting, gaudy PC.

>>59197879
you can do this with neural networks :')

File: IMG_2295.jpg (235KB, 1515x1275px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1515x1275px

I thought this was shitposting but when I went looking to prove you wrong... well youre not right but youre not as far off as everyone in here suggests. 2032 pits us right on the cusp of the human brain

Every prediction like this is flying-car level ass though.

File: IMG_2296.png (71KB, 1214x815px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1214x815px

>>59198519
Heres an updated version. Not quite "exponential" but still we should see the human brain outmatched by 2040

>>59198583
We have flying machines. I flew to Los Angeles last month
>>59194528
I think we will have humans on mars within a decade

>>59198585
Looks linear to me