Vivaldi advice

if you just want chrom*, without the botnet, download iridium. Its exactly what youre asking for

>>59162130
I don't know if that really is what I'm asking for, though. As I said, I'm against a mono-engine web, and the main attraction Vivaldi has for me is the customization and all the settings. Settings and configurations are my fetish.
I believe Iridium isn't really that kind of a browser, more like just a normal Chromium with some of the spying removed. I could be wrong, though, I've never tried it.

>>59162110
I am sort of in the same camp as you, but I've been using it for a while. I'd hate a mono-engine web but for now it's the best alternative and I have no means to change it myself, what can a dog do?

A mono-engine web will never occur as the web is like a hydra. Don't worry, things changed last time because of this phenomenon.

Vivaldi is a good browser. It will eventually become bloated and a better option will present itself. The same can be said for Chromium.

Enjoy the browser for what it is now, and jump ship to a new meme browser when a better option presents itself.

>>59163049
I guess you're right about that, one little individual can't really make a difference in such a big scene. Thinking about it, my main reason for using Firefox for so long has mostly just been an ethical one, it's not like I've ever thought it would actually count for something.

>>59163075
And I think you're right too, I can't imagine there being a permament state like that either. On the other hand, we did have some rough times during the reign of IE, and I'd rather always have a little diversity in browsers and their engines, to avoid even that dip.


The response has been surprisingly positive so far, and I'll keep trying out the browser for sure. It may be one of my favorite browsers out there currently.

>I really don't want to support a mono-engine web.
If that engine become a standard, it's not really a problem.
Exept Microsoft browsers, Firefox based or obscure independent browsers, almost every browsers nowadays are based on Blink/WebKit/KHTML, which are open source and forkable.

>>59162110
>First off, it's proprietary
But it's not. The source code is literally on their website. I have no idea where this shitty meme came from.

>>59164156
It is? I'm really sorry if I made a mistake and made myself look like a fool. I don't really know about the memes surrounding Vivaldi though, I just refered to wikipedia there, and now taking a quick look at the site, I can't really seem to find it. Maybe I'm just too sleepy for this, I'm just about to go to bed.
But anyway, I'd really like to see this for myself too, so if someone could be so very nice and point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it a lot.

Omg stop bitching and just use it.

>>59165114
Get raped and kill yourself, you dumb fucking shit stain.

>>59164996
https://vivaldi.com/source/

>>59163075
Love the "meme browser" used as a positive

best browser

>>59164156
>source code for not actual version
>it's just chromium source code, it doesn't contain their proprietary JS code
But sure, you can call PS4 OS "open-source".

File: 2017-02-28 12_42_26-Greenshot.png (307KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1920x1200px

it's p nice

>>59162110
Isn't Vivaldi using Chromium as more of a stop gap until they can develop their own internals?

>>59168955
Has someone here tried that? Does it compile, and if it does, what do you get?

Where do I place css for Vivaldi?

>>59162110
When you click a link or submit a form, sometimes there's no fucking indication it's doing anything. Vivaldi's gotten a lot better for what it is, but it still needs the finishing touches before it's more than something I jump on just for sites Opera 12 can't handle.

>>59174194
>it still needs the finishing touches
They're working on that.

>>59168955
>Has someone here tried that? Does it compile, and if it does, what do you get?
Bump

>>59169399
Source??