Post your Cinebench scores, /g/. I wanna see what you fags are

File: CinebenchR15.png (14KB, 497x231px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 497x231px

>5820k @ 4,2Ghz

>>59156331
>>59156340
>>59158925
Ryzen's gonna beat your sorry asses

>>59159284

Going for those overtime bucks?

>>59159300
it's working hours in india right now

>>59159284
lol? I've had my CPU for almost 2 years at this point and I paid ~$300 for it.

I needed an upgrade at the time, so why the fuck would I have waited for Ryzen?

File: paste.png (114KB, 509x732px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 509x732px

i5 3570k @ 4.3ghz

File: Capture.png (29KB, 613x728px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 613x728px

72 degrees during the test, throttled down to 2.9GHz, rate?

>>59156331
>>59156340
>>59158925
>>59159592
>>59159727
intel plebs

File: cst.jpg (65KB, 509x767px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 509x767px

>>59156331
Can't wait to upgrade to RYZEN. 4.6 GHZ i5

File: benchmarks.png (118KB, 1780x602px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1780x602px

I haven't gone through everyone else's posts, but here's mine.

>>59156340

>>59159825
here

that's delicious. How do you like that processor? What do you use it for?

File: cinebench.jpg (248KB, 1212x712px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1212x712px

Glad I held off for ryzen this pc is some motherboard from 2009 with a bulldozer thrown in. It used to have a x6 1100t but recent programs require AVX. I think the motherboard + ram + cpu cost me $500 in back in 2010 so it's been 7 years with only gpu and storage upgrades.

Totally ridiculous it took 7 years for an upgrade that can double performance without being 4x as expensive.

File: 1090T.png (50KB, 378x1080px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 378x1080px

Not bad for a seven year old CPU based on a decade old architecture to be honest desu famalam.

File: 3L0JQcn.png (31KB, 378x593px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 378x593px

Kinda glad I didn't get an i3 at the time since I do some c4d work

File: buckle up.jpg (10KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 184x184px

>>59159933
>>59159995
>>59159996
>hex core Phenom II wipes the floor with octa core Bulldozer and hex core Piledriver

Really activates your almonds.

>>59160046
He has a 800MHz OC, If I would oc to 4.6GHz I would get more than him I imagine (fx-6350 here)

File: bench.png (68KB, 644x764px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 644x764px

>when older cpus wipe the floor with the one you have

fuck, I was so stupid when I assembled this computer, wish I had known better (and had better budget)

>>59160046
A phenom with a die shrink and new instructions would have beaten bulldozer badly. I have no idea what they were thinking. I think 12 phenom cores at 32nm would fit on a bulldozer die as well.

>>59160070
Well, you'd need to find an extra 35% performance to draw level, so you'd be looking at 5.3GHz for parity if you're at 3.9GHz now. And that's assuming perfect scaling between clock speed and performance, which usually isn't the case.

Either way, the perf/clock performance decrease is ridiculous. AMD fucked up so badly.

>>59159727
Literally slower than my i3

>>59160070
Imagine if AMD had aggressively pushed the clocks up on the Phenom instead of Memedozer

File: 1387145367929.jpg (318KB, 1102x967px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1102x967px

>>59159727
>everyone has a faster cpu than me >>59160087

File: Untitled.png (29KB, 380x648px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 380x648px

I tried upgrading to i7-3770 and i7-3770K but my mobo destroyed all 3 cpu's I purchased. not OC'ed.

Will be upgrading here soon with that new hardware dropping on the market.

File: justanother3570at4.3.png (27KB, 375x594px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 375x594px

>>59156331

File: image_id_1484770.jpg (485KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 1920x1080px

>>59160168
If you think desktop bulldozer was bad you should see the servers.
This is the top of the line 16 "core" opteron. Only $1150 on newegg. I think it was $1800 around launch.

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3440x1440px

Move aside faggots

>>59160171
my cpu multi core benchmark is barely better than ryzen 1800x single thread

I just want money

File: cinecpuz.png (109KB, 1234x807px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1234x807px

>tfw 4690k

>>59159819
Nobody gives a shit you fucking shill.

File: cineb.png (40KB, 375x1080px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 375x1080px

>>59160580
tfw indeed
I was thinking about upgrading to Ryzen but after OCing to 4.6ghz I sat back and decided my cpu is plenty good for a while.

File: 123214123.png (31KB, 375x599px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 375x599px

>>59156331
delidded 4770k (CLU) on water. only 4,3 tho.

i wanna upgrade to ryzen cuz MUH cores, money isn't an issue but is it really worth it in the FPS department? 1x 1080p 144hz monitor.

trustworthy 4770k i bought it 4 years ago for 300$

File: JUST.png (43KB, 487x710px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 487x710px

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
FUCKING LET ME HAVE RYZEN ALREADY

File: Capture.png (32KB, 309x647px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 309x647px

tfw not gonna need a new CPU for the next 5 years

File: wVeVudS.png (33KB, 379x610px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 379x610px

>>59159996
>tfw only 65cb increase
wasted time overclocking

File: confused high elf.png (19KB, 187x187px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 187x187px

Cinebench seems pretty useless as a performance benchmark. It puts a Phenom II X6 >>59159995 at only 12% slower than a 4690K >>59162031, yet in real world terms the latter eats it for breakfast.

>>59162242
There's no saving Faildozer and its bastard offspring, anon. Just need to hope Ryzen delivers.

>>59162283
i know, but I'm a poorfag and r5/r3 only releases at h2, damn amd pajeets

File: 2500k.png (17KB, 364x399px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 364x399px

>>59162283
>2011 CPU

2500K at 4.6GHz. Any higher gets a bit too toasty in BurnTest
625 in multi-core

>>59159284
I'm going to buy a ryzen cpu as well after I see benchmarks. Enjoy being a poor fag.

File: 2017-02-17 20_59_31-CPU-Z.png (37KB, 801x395px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 801x395px

>>59159833
I use it for encoding blurays, much faster than my old Q6600.

File: cbenchr15 v3.png (48KB, 614x953px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 614x953px

>>59156331
4.2ghz @ 1.175v

File: Untitled.png (891KB, 1092x648px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 1092x648px

Seems about right.

Going from my A10 to an R7 1700 is gonna be one hell of a jump.

>>59164322
I went from A10-7850k to a 5820k (roughly similar to the 6 core R5-1600)

Was a good upgrade, I only had the APU cause it was essentially free.

File: Cinebench R15.png (1MB, 1444x876px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1444x876px

Still a nice chip, but 3.3ghz all-core turbo is kinda meh especially since Ryzen is about to hit and shitstomp all over it.

File: cinebench-r7-1700.png (118KB, 2176x720px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 2176x720px

>>59164346
You could have waited a little longer and bought an R7 1700 but we all make mistake, you know?

>>59164380
I upgraded over 18 months ago moron.

>>59164395
18 months ago zen was still in development you traitor, hope that intel cock tastes real good.

>>59164422
It's been in development since Bulldozer, that's not a valid argument.


You know just how shit those APUs are, if you could have upgraded a year and a half ago, you would've too.

Not to mention, since I have a microcenter nearby my 5820k cost me under $300.

>>59162283
>Cinebench seems pretty useless as a performance benchmark
Not if you do rendering, compiling and simulations. Nothing ever offered enough more power to justify upgrading. Take my 7 year old x1100 / bulldozer PC for example, The motherboard, cpu and ram probably cost me $500 Australian dollars. The 8 core i7 can give me about twice the performance but the CPU motherboard and ram would cost around $2000 Australian dollars. $2000 to beat a 7 year old $500 PC by 100% is not very enticing.

Before intel fucked everything up I use to buy a new PC every 18 months at most.

>>59156331
Can't wait for Ryzen

File: Udklip.png (22KB, 298x509px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 298x509px

>>59164584

File: Capture.png (34KB, 395x737px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 395x737px

>>59156331
mobile ryzen chips when?

>>59164702
Likely with the release of the APUs, as the high-bins of those should be well suited for laptop use.

>>59164848
fuck the laptop market would become more exciting now

gone will be the days of power restricted performance

They need to put 4gb HBM2 cache on the APUs. 4 ryzen cores +HBM2 cache and rx480 gpu would kill all midrange.

File: Cinebench426sing.png (34KB, 322x817px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 322x817px

>>59160529
That's cute anon.

File: cinebench.png (144KB, 360x774px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 360x774px

lel

File: [email protected] (87KB, 504x587px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 504x587px

>>59165694
This thread is for R15, not R11.5 just saying.

>>59159803
bulldozer is shit

File: ur_a_retard.png (3MB, 1600x1700px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x1700px

>>59165710

No shit. Retard.

>>59164702
Not likely, with proprietary Intel tech (Thunderbolt, M2-upgradable ram) being all the rage for laptops combined with Kaby Lake scoring big with the low-voltage market and expanding on that for coffee lake, I doubt AMD can make a solid stand in the laptop market without some unreal APU TDPs

File: cinebench.jpg (76KB, 651x269px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 651x269px

>>59156331
6400 @ 4.5Ghz I believe.

>>59165806
Then what the fuck is the point in posting ONLY a R11.5 score without an R15 score?

You posted an R11.5 score with ZERO context and just said
>lel

The only retard here is you.

>>59165806
>I was only pretending to be retarded
>haha got eem

I'm too lazy to screenshot
I got 832 on my i7 4770k @ 4.2ghz 1.16v

File: mycinebench.png (566KB, 1020x897px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1020x897px

this is my very first cinebench benchmark <3

>>59166095
Wow, so this is what it's like to literally have shit for brains.

File: image.jpg (163KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 640x480px

>>59166291
>he fell for the reply

>>59166291
Really?


Lets just follow the chain

>>59165694
The first post, no connecting post, no previous mention of scores, just says
>lel
with a picture attached of an R11.5 score, irrelevant to every other poster in this thread.
>>59165710
The first reply to the original post. Pointing out you posted an R11.5 score, and not an R15 score which makes your post rather pointless, in order to make you feel a bit less pointless, i went ahead and included my own R11.5 score so you could at least have something else to compare it to.
>>59165806
Your reply calling me retarded for pointing out your obvious mistake
>>59166095
Me calling you out again for being stupid and not posting the right scores.
>>59166138
Someone else replying also calling you out for being retarded
>>59166291
You trying to back peddle


So please, point out anywhere in there where you posted an R15 score, or where you mentioned why you even posted an R11.5 score in a thread dedicated to R15 scores.

I'll wait.

File: 4.6GHZ.jpg (84KB, 371x953px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 371x953px

waiting for zen++

File: image.png (543KB, 1000x847px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1000x847px

>>59166361
He fell for the reply even harder

File: 1442705248332.gif (964KB, 397x658px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 397x658px

>>59166511
Enjoy being retarded senpai, literally anyone who has used 4chan for more than 3 weeks can follow a simple comment chain and see who the retard is.

File: meh.png (24KB, 398x501px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 398x501px

the fx8350 meme

>>59166575
Man, even an """""eight""""" core Piledriver loses to that Phenom II X6 at the same frequency.

File: 789.png (2KB, 304x18px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 304x18px

>4.4ghz
>still won't exceed 500cb like everyone else with this CPU
I hate this motherboard.

Not that it actually matters since the downclocking never happens during real-world usage such as CPU-intensive video games.

File: Untitled.png (30KB, 373x685px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 373x685px

overclocked to stable 4.4 ghz at only 1.26 volts, Did I win the silicon lottery?

File: image.png (21KB, 762x829px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 762x829px

>>59167082
4.4 isn't hard, I got 4.3ghz at stock voltage, then 4.5 took 1.35 volts
People go way above that regularly

>>59160046
are you that guy who activates his almonds every day here

>>59167082
You're the guy at the far left and near the bottom here >>59167120
I mean that's a good clock for the voltage you have, but ypu could go further

>>59167161
how much further do you think it could go?

>>59167247
Until you're unable to run benchmark completely or you hit 90°+ during stress loads

>>59167247
You saw what I posted right? Those are 6600ks and 6700ks in the pic, some are watercooled

File: Capture.jpg (58KB, 380x689px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 380x689px

i7-4790 @ 4.7Ghz, could probably go higher

File: image.png (409KB, 1144x888px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1144x888px

>All these plebs with single core scores that match my laptop

File: cinebench.jpg (118KB, 374x1089px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 374x1089px

Didn't expect much, didn't get much. But it's also just a T430 with an eGPU.

File: single+multi.png (38KB, 751x660px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 751x660px

i7-6800k @ 4.0GHz

>>59167843
>actually legit wrecked by 7700k

File: cb.jpg (90KB, 512x701px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 512x701px

>>59156331
This will actually last me for several more years without problem, never bottlenecked by cpu.
But I'm pretty sure I'll get zen soon, just for some new overclocking fun.

File: Dual.jpg (115KB, 508x664px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 508x664px

2x 2670. Best $120 ever

File: shyiit.jpg (62KB, 477x360px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 477x360px

why hasn't there been better improvement with single core performance?

>>59168837
We know what the picture looks like

File: x99 update.png (53KB, 851x469px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 851x469px

>>59167843
@ 4.2Ghz

>>59168762
$120?
ES cpus or what?

>>59168979
a few months or so ebay was flooded with e5-2670 cpus for around $50 each. They are C2 stepping. You can still get them for about $90. Nice 8 core that goes up to dual cpu. Good for high power budget rendering. But the dual cpu mobo's are a pain to get.

File: Bench.png (32KB, 368x936px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 368x936px

>>59167082
Maybe you did m8
@4.5Ghz 1.300 volts.

>>59159819
Aye, you'll pay 350$+ for the same single core performance

File: 2017-01-27 17.14.36.jpg (2MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3120x4160px

>>59156331
e5-2680 oc'd by a whooping 5%
got this lil asshole with mobo, cooler and 16gigs for just like $280 after my tax deduction

>phone pic
don't get triggered cinderellas, took it when assembling the build

>>59170595
¿Cinderella?
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

>>59170919
kek'd

File: image.jpg (417KB, 2093x2517px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 2093x2517px

>>59171416
>tfw fell for the i5 meme

Don't feel like running Cinebench since I'm extracting something.
Multi-threaded score was 792 on a stock 4790 last I tested.

>>59156331
I also have an i5 3570k.
Should i upgrade? I'm only interested in lowering C++ compile times

>>59160635
>>59162466
>4.6GHz

Seriously? I'm too worried to OC my 6700K to more than 4.4, how high could I realistically/safely go? (like 80C max)

>>59174046
4.7GHz with decent cooling and assuming your chip is on the better half of the scale.

it's about 50/50 of chips that can hit 4.7GHz without breaking 1.35v