INTEL BTFO. HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

https://youtu.be/9AVZ_x64hg4

File: how will they ever.png (24KB, 642x471px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 642x471px

you're right they lost 16 cents how will they ever

forgot about bulldozer already?

>>59149962

AMD needs gimmicks like RGB to appeal to the 14 year old that buys those budget chips

>>59150049
>implying RGB is a gimmick and doesn't boost performance
>implying intel is better
>implying implying
How can Intel even compete???

File: reminder_box.jpg (103KB, 576x768px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 576x768px

>>59149508
Maybe you need the "reminder" box
Also nice PCIe lanes!

File: SHUTITDOWNSHUTITDOWNSHUT_IT_THE_FUCK_DOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNjpg.jpg (64KB, 297x365px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 297x365px

>>59150032
This is Zen though. The fact that AMD screwed up with Bulldozer allowing intel to completely Jew out will mean that an actual competetive processor like Ryzen is going to hit Intel ten times harder.

>>59150032
You clearly have.
The bulldozer leaks showed it to be hot garbage, and the defense squad was out saying shit like
B...but it's only a engineering sample
T..T..the leaks are fake

Basically all the shit that intel shills are saying now.

>>59150011
amd made 8% just today..

File: 1487952426968.jpg (674KB, 655x1024px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 655x1024px

>>59150068
It's over, Intel is finished.

File: 1469315616090.png (9KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 501x585px

>>59149508
not like this, not like this

>>59150080
it's like the athalon all over again, lets hope they don't tank it for 12 years inbetween like they will inevitably do.

File: a85085095a93074523f346a3eb7a05b2.jpg (70KB, 1631x1571px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1631x1571px

Who /preordered 1800X/ here?

File: kek.png (75KB, 1329x688px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1329x688px

>>59150080

>>59150032
Pretty much all the benchmarks showed Bulldozer was hot trash from the start. Every single benchmark has shown Ryzen competitive in the market the R7 is aimed at (content creators, workstations and streamers). It's lacking in the gaming performance but that's R5's job. I'll freely criticize AMD if R5 doesn't clock higher than R7, sure.

>>59151079
>not even the same scale
0/10

>>59151079
That .com bubble bulge

Anyways the #1 rule of investing is that past performance doesn't indicate future performance, so putting a graph back to 1978 is only good for memes

>>59149962
fucking hell is that the cpu cooler that sounds like that?
Another phenom ii jet engine

>>59151098
0/10 you don't even know how to read stocks.

let me sum it up for:
>Intel = investment grade stocks, actually pays the stock holders dividends because they know how to make money

>AMD a step up from penny stocks, never pay dividends because they suck at making money. Over 30 years barely managed to double in value.

>>59150049
It's a brilliant gimmick that costs them next to nothing but gets them guaranteed headlines and sales.

>>59150201
>yellow fan
So...they're radioactive?

>>59151166
>Performance back to 1978
>Implying past performance implies future performance
I hope you have an investment advisor or you'll be a poorfag soon

>1.8V

ENJOY YOUR HOUSEFIRES

File: 8041_02_enermax-ets-t50-axe-cpu-cooler-review.jpg (51KB, 620x490px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 620x490px

>>59150201
Guys...

>>59153592
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

File: 1488123256707.jpg (22KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 351x351px

>>59153613
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QWEoyvMLJA

I'm not a gaymer. I'm straight.

>>59150032
Forgot about athlon already?

File: stop.png (81KB, 297x326px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 297x326px

>>59151285
>he's too young to remember when processors were 2v, 3v or even higher

intel haven't even been trying. everyone knows this

amd will awaken the beast

i can't wait

File: Intel designed final solution.png (297KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 550x550px

>>59153663
>AMD will awaken the beast

>>59153634
motherfucking pajeets and their tasteful designs

>>59153672
Ebin

>>59149508
No one got BTFO'ed haha. Intel is still unmatched when it comes to performance.

File: intel pentium.jpg (177KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 801x1500px

>>59153663

>>59153672
>single socket holocaust

>>59153898
I'm not the single socket holocaust guy, just a fan.

>>59151031
not me but i am very VERY interested in the 1st revision

>>59153906
I always post single socket holocaust or intel designed final solution whenever anyone posts the P4EE

>>59149508

5.2ghz sounds like a ridiculous overclock.

If I'm not willing to overclock, is this a chip that can replace my i5 3570k with a noticeable speed difference?

>>59154002
It's about five times as fast as the 3570K

>>59154012
what a joke lmao
in single threaded performance they're going to be comparable
in games the difference will be like 10%
it's really a nothingburger if the guy's 3570k is oc'd

>>59154075

Unfortunately, I never got the opportunity to OC mine. I got a defective motherboard, but didn't know the motherboard was causing problems until a few years later, at which point the selection of boards for my CPU and form factor were slim pickins.

>>59154126
well then you will likely benefit significantly from an upgrade IMO, but I'd wait until the R3/R5 chips are out along with real-world benches

>>59151031
I'm going to get 1800x when motherboard suppliers software and hardware have been proven stable, it's literally bleeding edge now and some problem is abound to happen.

>>59154214
ARCH USERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>59154214
I'm considering ordering the processor alone and sitting on it until everything stabilizes. I learned from the RX480 to expect perpetual sold out signs for months after release.

>>59155631
what a dumb fucking idea
you do realize these things only go DOWN in value and never up, right?
just wait... jesus christ why is /g/ full of retards

>>59154075
>in single threaded performance they're going to be comparable
It's faster than the 7700K in single threaded performance, so yeah, it is somewhat faster than a 3570K, even if OC'd
>>59155631
/ourgirl/ Lisa Su promised widespread availability on launch day, but with the rumor of preorders already selling out the first batch then it seems kind of impossible for that to happen

>>59156177
>'s faster than the 7700K in single threaded performance
wrong

>>59155836
>you do realize these things only go DOWN in value and never up, right?
Retailers will increase prices if there's enough demand, the 290X/290 is the most notable recent occurence of this
>>59156188
But it literally is, every benchmark so far and everything respetable reviewers under NDA's have said point to that

>>59149508
>PCgaymen
>posted 9 hours ago
>same picture grabbed from currytech which was posted last week
>1.875V

Wow its nothing!

>>59156241
>point to that
speculative nonsense as usual

>>59156241
>Retailers will increase prices if there's enough demand, the 290X/290 is the most notable recent occurence of this
always down over time, never up
only up over short periods
deal with it 'tardzilla

>>59156273
>just wait! it will eventually be worthless in 30 years :DDDD
Anyways, some unicorn chips don't really go down in value over time, most Extreme Edition Intel's are pretty close to their launch MSRP

>>59156308
>not preordering = waiting 30 years
retard

>>59150080
>amd made 8% just today..

Pretty sure that comes out to less than 16 cents.

>>59156324
You might be waiting until Q3 if demand is as big as it is
First gen Ryzen won't drop in price until Zen+ hits in a year

>>59156354
I'm not suggesting anyone wait in price
I'm suggesting that preordering it is fucking stupid

pros/cons of preordering:
pros:
none
cons:
it's only going to go down in price and will never increase

pros/cons of waiting:
pros:
it's there whenever you feel like buying it and you may possibly save some money
cons:
none

tl;dr: you are fucking stupid

>>59154002
>5.2ghz sounds like a ridiculous overclock.

Well considering that the stock clock on all cpus is around 4ghz nowadays, 5.2 is something around 33% at best, which is far less impressive. The original Celerons went from 300MHz to 700MHz, and even my old Core 2 e6550 could go from 2.3 to 3.15 on stock volts (33%), and up to 3.5 with voltage bumps (50%). Probably could've gone way higher too, but I didn't have fast enough RAM to drive it, or a decent enough cooler.

>>59156372
>want to buy it on launch day
>now have to wait weeks and even months for supply
wew you sure are bright aren't you?

>>59150080
>tfw should have bought at 1.80
>tfw should have bought at 7.00
>tfw should have bought at 13.00
this shit will go all the way to $30.

>>59154273
>yfw only the latest Linux kernel supports Ryzen's hyperthreading to the fullest extent and Debian users are cucked if they want to use Ryzen

>>59156487
likely going to far surpass that.

File: 1488177418325.jpg (29KB, 597x597px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 597x597px

>>59151031

I'd like to but then

>mfw no mITX mobo out yet

>>59156487
You could have bought increments the whole way.

More effective than chasing a "big win"

File: jew.jpg (45KB, 590x475px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 590x475px

>>59149508
>HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER?

By undercutting AMD, paying blogwriters to not write good things about Ryzen and making exclusive deals with large-volume customers.

>>59156383
Same CPU size, less transistors

https://youtu.be/sifewNGA0Z4

Intel: MOAR COREZ!

>>59157238

Same, the good thing is all the bugs will be squashed, and the next stepping overclocks will be higher or the same with less volts.

>>59157852
but I was told by people here that we don't need more than 4 or 6. are you telling me that people LIE on the internet?

>>59157891

They just have buyers remorse at not waiting for Zen.

>>59150032
I'm guess then you didn't buy a Conroe back in the day just because you were pissed about Prescott, right?

>>59157282
Jews always win in the end no matter how good you are