>see Manjaro screenshots often on here >decide to try it

Personally I am not sure. Installation went like a dream for me. I really enjoy this distro and am not really considering anything else atm. Pretty comfy.

>>59149419
Manjaro seems nice, but without the encryption, I don't feel comfy.

I guess I can try encrypting my home post install.

File: 68214930.png (85KB, 283x283px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 283x283px

>>59149441
You only need to worry about encryption if you are doing things illegal anon

>>59149816
That's a stupid and dangerous thinking.

Because I'm not doing illegal things doesn't mean I should forget about encryption.

What's the point in using this over antergos?

>>59149838
Confirmed for pedo terrorist.

>>59149926
Nice projection m8

>>59149911
There isn't any.

>>59148734
does manjaro plan to drop i686?

>>59149936
>projection
I'm not the one encrypting my hard drives worrying about the feds busting through the door anon.

>>59149972
I'd be really confused if the feds come busting through the door seeing that I don't live in the US.

>>59150000
So was Kim Dotcom.

>>59150000
nice quads anon

dunno, I dualboot mandingo on my mbp 2012, works fine with the encryption, what do you install it on?

>>59150053
T-thanks, you t-too.

XPS 13 (9360)

Manjaro 16.10 stable wouldn't boot from USB, so I had to go with unstable release, which booted fine. Not sure if using unstable release is the cause but considering I can install it fine without enabling encryption, probably not. Even installed calamares-dev to see if that fixes it, it didn't.

Ah well, not much of loss here, just a bit of my time, I'm at the stage where I'm distro hopping and see what I'll end up sticking with.

>>59150149
>16.10
Why is it using Ubuntu numbering?

>>59149911
they have their own update cycle and their own default packages afaik?

>>59152363
Well, it's not that much different from Arch, but Manjaro holds back the packages for 1-2 weeks (for stable) and couple of days (for unstable), from what I can see anyway.

>>59150186
Year:Month of release

>>59148734

>Why is it so bad and insecure?
>Arch Linux derivative

Did you install the KDE version? Because I had lots of stability problems with the KDE version.

>>59152916
Xfce version.

Anyways I ended going with Antergos and changed trackpad drivers from synaptics to libinput, comfy as fuck now.

>>59149950
they're waiting to see what happens with arch group that said would step up to maintaining i686

>>59148734
Because it's a shittier ripoff of arch. It has slower and more incompetent developers. It also has its own shittier and smaller repos (you get packages a week later and they break more than arch).

>>59148734
Devs are absolute idiots, forgot to renew SSL certs twice and their solution was to ask users to roll back their clocks.

lol k