>http://www.tweaktown.com/news/5644 0/intel-rocked-core-o

File: oy-vey.jpg (145KB, 1500x1054px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1500x1054px

>2017
>not supporting the reason for the price drops

>meanwhile this was a ploy by AMD to see how low Intel was willing to lower prices, and then undercut them with the R5 and R3

Sorry Pajeet, we're playing 4 dimensional chess now.

File: 1483134076957.png (385KB, 656x646px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 656x646px

>>59144420
>http://www.tweaktown.com/news/56440/intel-rocked-core-over-ryzen-price-drops-begin/index.html
>microcenter
>IN-STORE PICKUP ONLY!

So almost everyone is stuck with this?
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117726

>>59144441
Damn, that sounds plausible

File: 1482469184022.jpg (242KB, 850x1211px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 850x1211px

>>59144420
Not to mention the 4+ core CPUs that the R7 is actually meant to compete with hasn't dropped even remotely enough to make Intel competitive.

Microcenter is just trying to clear stock in time for the R5 to destroy everything and Intel to become deprecated. Business 101.

When has the i7-7700K costed $379 at MicroCenter?

File: 1487822008278.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

>>59144420
>6900K isn't $400
>6850K isn't $260
>7700K isn't $200
>7600K isn't $150
I don't see any price parity, do you?

>>59144420
jew spotted

>>59144441
I'll die of laughter if that happens.