>His next device won't have USB-C Explain yourselves

>>59137596
My next device surely will have usb-c/tdb3 I'm always up for this kind of improvements.

>>59137596
It will have Type-C but it won't have Thunderbolt 3 most likely.

>implying I can even afford a next device

thanks for the laff

File: dunno.jpg (23KB, 500x327px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x327px

>>59137596
The cables are flimsy and expensive. If you buy the cheaper ones, they fry your device. USB type A is superior in every way except for the thin meme. Thin devices are also responsible for exploding devices.

My Thickpads keep me a few dollars richer and won't kill me. Seems like not using USB type C is a win win for me.

1. It already does and I consider it a mandatory feature on my future phone purchases unless a new, superior and more widely adopted standard supercedes it
2. That doesn't mean change for the sake of change is good. If I didn't think USB-C was an objective improvement I would avoid it, like "brave" phones that cut the 3.5mm jack.

>>59137802
>Cables are flimsy, cheap ones are garbage
That's literally every charging standard ever though. It'll take a year or two for good cables to hit the market.

Why would a dragon dildo have USB-C?

my fucking zte zmaxx pro has usb c and its a bargain

>>59137596
It's a Nokia faggot

File: 1478727734836.png (124KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x376px

>too intallgence for hard wire data tranfers

File: image.jpg (18KB, 500x265px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x265px

>His USB C port is USB 2.0
Macfags will defend this
Dongleport3 fags need not apply

My concern with usb c is it's strength. Not hard to brush a plugged in device and snap the something.
I'd rather they just upgrade usb a with more wires. It holds securely in the port, not sure how good c is. Just seems like a port that's due to flop really. Just pushed by mobile manufactures because of space issues.

USB-C is garbage. I honestly wish we would use Lightning instead of that abomination but then again its USB. It became shit beyond every measure since OG USB 3.0

File: 1444434839858.png (254KB, 1364x312px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1364x312px

>>59138446
Forgot pic

>>59137596
USB Type C is shit.

connector is kinda shit

>>59138446
what happened past original USB3.0?

>>59138471
wow this esoteric graphic with some blue and green really convinced me of your point

>>59138471
what exactly am I looking at here?

My next device will be the Nintendo switch so it will

As for my next phone? It depends on what they put into the note 8 I am still on note 5 cause FUCK to S series

File: Sony-Xperia-XZ-Review-10.jpg (170KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1280x720px

>his current device doesnt have type-c
fucking kek op

>>59138517
green and blue you dumbass
don't you even know about the green and blue?

I wont buy a new phone until I get one with removable battery and microsd (so never). Until then I'll stick to my note 4.

My current device has USB C. All of my next devices will have USB C.

I fucking hate USB micro connectors.

>>59138499
>>59138517
>>59138488
>>59138535

Its a waterfall RF spectrum plot showing 2.4GHz band interference. You can test it yourself by putting a plugged in USB3.0 device near your laptop's antennas and see how your 2.4GHz WiFi connection drops. This applies to all wireless technologies operating on 2.4GHz band and is the exact reason why USB3.0 is rarely seen on RF sensitive devices like say routers unless they're expensive and manufacturer could afford putting extra RF shielding.

>>59138631
brutal... fuck

>>59138631
>has money for usb-c devices
>uses old 2.4 ghz wifi shitbox

>>59138656
>5 Ghz
>have 1 wall between you and router
>no signal
genius

>>59138656
Its inexcusable for any wired standard to leak out strong RF interference my friendo and 2.4GHz beats 5GHz every time in terms of range given the same input power

File: GPD_Windows_10_Gaming_Console_Connectors.jpg (16KB, 680x246px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 680x246px

>>59137596
My device already has USB-C...

File: 1487917914527.png (358KB, 552x543px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 552x543px

>>59138631
What chink shit are you buying that leaks that much RFI?
if anything just buy a large roll of EMI shielding and line your shit with it

>>59137596
I enjoy holding back progress.

Im not crazy about usb c. I had a Moto Z play, returned it. Bought an LG G5 instead, sold it. I like micro usb, its the most widely used for bluetooth headsets. I like having one cable in my work truck that does my phone and headset.

I didn't like how fuck huge the plug was at the phone and how stiff the cables were. I'm sure it'll get better in the future, but ill wait for improvements. Currently on a desprintified s7 I got for super cheap.

>>59138817
Except nobody cares and you just stay behind.

>His next device won't be made by transgendered individuals
Explain yourselves

This is the future. You're holding back progress

>>59138814
See what happens when you plug in a USB3.0 port to Macbook "Pro" 2016. Smaller and more dense devices are more prone to USB3's RFI and I was happy as fuck to see how Apple failed to account for that with their newest Macbook.Think even Rossman observed that but never realised what was causing it since he's not necessarily the most educated person. Honestly hope more people would realise just how shit USB3 really is.

>>59138631
Show a waterfall RF spectrum of plugging in a USB type C then

File: USB-Powered-03.gif (128KB, 650x627px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 650x627px

>yet another port
I'm starting to miss the days of d-ports and giant printer serial slots that just bridged devices instead of selling themselves as the solution to life's ills.

>>59138944
Sadly I don't have any USB3 devices with C type connector to measure its RFI but I don't expect it to be significantly better. See >>59138906
Feel free to look it up.

>>59138851
How am I holding back progress then?

>>59137802
>superior in every way expect for thin
Wrong. Symmetrical meme too

>>59139004
So your against what exactly? USB 3? USB in general?

>>59137596

All android phones released in 2016-17 still in microUSB.
Newest motherboards use USB 2.0/3.0.
Dont exist Type C pendrives.

>>59139029
USB 3. USB 2.0 was fine.

BTW just so you don't think I'm talking out of my ass Intel even released a white paper about this exact issue
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/io/universal-serial-bus/usb3-frequency-interference-paper.html

why cant i just have usb c and display port for all the things

phone, tablet, tv, pc, monitors and car

why even fucking live

>>59139071
Do what do you want to happen? Everyone use USB 2 or they just address the issue and release USB4 or some shit that fixed the RF leak?

File: tailsusb.jpg (14KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x400px

>>59138471
>>59138631
>>59139071
>RF leaking all over the place from USB drive
>potential data from the drive in that noise that can be intercepted
good thing this doesn't affect anything, right guys?

>>59139083
It wouldn't make sense to force everyone to use slow USB2.0 all over again. USB4 or whatever the next iteration of USB addressing it would be nice. Or we could just switch to Thunderbolt which AFAIK doesn't pose this issue but that's pretty much impossible given the amount of legacy USB devices, cost of Thunderbolt controllers, limitations on cable lengths as so on.

>>59139112
and now you know why i use fiber optic cables instead of ethernet for sensitive contracts
(finances and banking)

everything is essentially a antenna and everything is giving off electro magnetic radiation

>>59139169
Thunderbolt is a meme
What about an even worse meme like Firewire?

>>59138227
Nexus 6P has a USB 2.0C port

>>59139241
FW was actually really well designed. Obviously faster than USB2 back then, required less CPU overhead for data transfers and ofc no RF problems. You gotta give it to Sony engineers who designed it. It died because Intel didn't back it so if manufacturers wanted to offer Firewire interface in their device they had to buy and implement additional controller to handle it. It could be a really interesting landscape these days with Firewire being still around. If Intel would've backed it back then then we would all be probably using some iteration of Firewire now.

>>59138522
Gonna get one also anon. Ya think it will be available at launch? I want to order in online from Target.

>>59139241
The main difference between USB and Firewire was that USB is Client-Host while FW was Peer to Peer so technically chained FW devices were capable of talking directly to each other without the need to go through the Host (most often a PC) and this huge architectural difference allowed FW to be daisychained while maintaining low latency communication.
For example imagine copying data from one HDD to another HDD over Firewire. Because of P2P architecture they would be directly sending data between each other without the need to pass every frame of data through the Host controller (a PC) and its CPU only to output it to target HDD like you have to with USB. Its much more efficient for data transfers. I was hoping to dig out an old white paper about it but it must be somewhere deep in my archive. God knows where.

>>59139519
Probably not. Nintendo is infamous for not having enough of anything at launch as an excuse to jack up prices

>>59139347
>Sony engineers who designed it
???

I thought Thunderbolt was primarily a collaboration between Apple and Intel.

>>59137596
>His next mobo/case won't have USB-C

they need to hurry the fuck up

>>59139599
FW == Firewire. That post was about Firewire. I think you miss read it

>>59137596
Everything I own uses USB Type A
I'll use Type C once its less prone to fire and more shit uses it

>>59138631
>>59139071
>>59139169
>>59139347
>>59139588
Thanks anon. It was actually refreshing to hear something like this on /g/

>>59138524
>his phone doesn't have Thunderbolt 4
l m a o f a m

>>59139588
Do you work with these kind of systems or do you just have autism?

>>59137596

is this just to assist retards who don't know which way to plug it in?

>>59139922
I'm a low level protocol and software architect so both I guess.

File: TB-Bandwidth.png (99KB, 1207x632px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1207x632px

>/g/ doesn't like Thunderbolt 3
Gesus Christ.

>>59139972
That explains a lot

>>59138772
Cheers bro, just ordered a usb c hard drive encosure and cord for mine. I hope it helps since my 128gb sd and 128gb samsung fit just aren't cutting it

>>59140016
It doesn't matter how good something is if nothing uses it

File: IMG_20170222_144250(1).jpg (2MB, 2400x3200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x3200px

my current devices already have type c

File: 1488149565287.jpg (188KB, 1284x980px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1284x980px

>>59140604
https://www.amazon.com/DisplayPort-Z170-Motherboards-SABERTOOTH-MARK/dp/B015JKNDJ0
>Using this much of a memeboard

>>59139588
very interesting. why didnt intel back it up? what are the negatives with firewire?

My current zuk z2 and previous mi 4c both had type c.

>>59140633
But he has to show /v/ how much of a gaymer he is!

>>59140633
this might shock you but there are people in this world who make enough money to buy things that look nice and perform well and dont always have to choose the poorer options

File: 91TCpI+3CIL._SL1500_.jpg (290KB, 1169x1500px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1169x1500px

>>59140704
I know there are. And you aren't one of them
Shitty plastic covering most of your mobo does not look good

>>59140704
>>59140745
what does that even suppose to do? spread the heat around using conduction?

>>59140745
thermal armor looks good. keeps dust out of the important shit and is easier to clean off. the IO dust caps are nice too. the only downside is the sound port dust caps are extremely easy to lose

there is no reason not to buy the sabertooth mk1 when you can afford it. it has all the same features as other asus boards, and it's the best pick of the z170 chipset boards - if you're willing to spend the cash.

keep using off-topic arguments to project away all that cuck anger for why you buy cheap ugly shit and stay mad poor child.

>>59140908
>Dust gets under shitty plastic
>Have to take it off to clean
amazing
>Paying almost double for pieces of plastic
wew

>>59137596

>His

But I'm a girl.

>>59138631
>cheap chinese chink fuck AC router with usb 3
>no wifi issues on 5 or 2.4ghz
sounds like it's just a matter of companies being jews more than anything really

My next device is a Nintendo Switch, which is USB-C

>>59140671
controllers, cost of implementation
USB is cheap as fuck to implement that's why it won

>>59140368
>nothing uses it
Every USB C device works with it.
Every USB 1, 2, and 3 device works with it using a (passive) dongle.
External GPU enclosures work with it.
4K displays work with it.
DisplayPort works with it using a (passive) dongle
All-in-one port extenders work with it.

Not getting TB3 leaves you stranded with 10Gbps.

>>59140960
post dick

>>59138524
>xz

this guy knows whats up

File: y.png (654KB, 1280x765px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1280x765px

>>59138968
>muh white background is default cause wysiwyg even if never going to be printed

>>59140908
>>59140946
do you guys still get dust in your computers? get a dust filter. literally never had to clean my computer.

>>59138839
So this is the power of autism, whoa

File: 1481316051140.jpg (764KB, 2704x2392px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 2704x2392px

>>59137596
>His next device won't have USB-C
>not buying an AM4 mobo that has it
WRONG

>>59137596
what about micro B, and mini D?

>>59139026
>Symmetrical meme too
Why, though? You can't possibly not know which side to insert USB plug in.

>>59142219
>mini D
Well, this one you have already.

>>59137596
Surface book has no USB C somehow

>>59137802
Kys

With USB c I can use the same cable for literally anything, the same cable charges my phone and laptop

>>59140671

not that guy. Intel pushed USB initially because it used a lot of cpu to manage the interface. More cpu demands == higher end cpus sold.

firewire is a lot like SCSI in that the cpu could be pretty hands off.

>>59137596
Who's not using USB C other than Samshit?

>>59142557
Intel delaying progress by being jews yet again

>>59137596
Nigger, my phone has had USB-C for over a year already. You get with the times.

>>59137596
what does C do that matters?

I fucking love USB C bro
The only thing I DONT like about it is that NOT everything is already USB C. It's all the good parts about micro USB, but better.

USB A is still better than C. Idk who thinks that anything other than. Gadgets, tablets and phones need USB C but fuck off. I'll keep my USB 3 shit type A please and fuck off.

>>59142535
could do that usb, but there were 4 variants you needed an adapter for.

mini
micro
printer/scanner
olympus

all type c has is retard proofing with more potential wear and tear failure.

>>59139945
something like 2-3 times faster and more power goes through it too.

>>59137596
my current device has usb-c, you stupid sack of shit with down syndrome

>>59142700
its too flimsy and small

>>59137596
I have two phones, one with each connector.
I prefer the micro USB because the usb-c has taken phones back to the time where we had Nokia chargers and Ericsson chargers etc.
Right now my charger is only that, a charger.
I do no longer have a billion chargers so I can charge the phone in any corner of my house, I cannot connect it to my computer, I just have the one.
Eventually I will cave and buy a dusin, but I rather wait until I have to give up my other phone.

>>59142319
As in you can plug it in upside down...? A big problem for type a...

>>59140016
>proprietary interface that only works on intel
Put it in the bin.

>>59141389
are you new?

>>59142535
you are fucking dumb.

>>59137596
thank you based htc for giving the htc 10 actual usb 3.1 connection through type-c when everyone else (even google) still uses cucked usb2.0 through type-c or microusb like samshit.

now just make sure to use ufs2.0 on the 11

who /able-to-saturate-your-phones-nand/ here?

>>59142535
I don’t own a single usb type c device. My world is still usb 2 and 3 and mini and micro. I'm in no hurry to update that

>tfw in the future, people will wonder why it's called "USB C" instead of A just like how people today wonder why it's called the C drive

>pins get bent
>can't bend them back
The apple cord is superior

>>59138227
Macs don't use USB 2.0 for type C you retard

>>59145506
better pins being fucked on the cable rather than a device itself.

Easier to replace cable than the connection on a device.

>>59140268
get a 256gb microsd, a external hard drive is just retarded, you won't be even able to charge if it occupies the usb-c port
if you need that much space at least get a wireless hard drive enclosure with a ssd

>>59138656
You are a real normie, aren't you?
Now to get some knowledge into your brain: 2.4GHz is not magically faster. There are very few scenarios in which 5GHz leads to a faster connection. 5GHz has less range, however, it has more channels and that's about the only real-world benefit. Unless all of your channels are taken by your neighbors it's more beneficial for you to use 2.4GHz because of the additional range. Well, of course only if you live in something larger than a cardboard box.

File: htc-10-silver.png (137KB, 882x1075px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 882x1075px

>>59137596
I bought a HTC 10 only because it had USB-C

MicroUSB was always a source of problems in my previous phones.

>>59137596
I already have tb3

>>59139592
Feelsbadman

Hopefully I can get my hands on one. If not I'll just work on another project that I want to do.

getting an a5(2017), so no.

>>59137596
Bought new LGA 1155 motherboard for a Core i7-2600K I got for peanuts.
I may buy USB 3.0 TYPE A controller for it.

so if I understand this correctly, with type C you can actually charge your laptop battery with a USB power supply? does that mean I can expand my laptop battery by plugging in a battery built to re-charge a phone? if so, Im in.

Also, is it backwards compatible?

>>59145728
How's the HTC 10 working out for you?
I'm still rocking my M8, do you think is worth the upgrade, or just wait?

>>59138312
I have a phone with usb-c and it fits more snug than USB-A

>>59137596
but it does anon

USB-C is for peripheral devices like phones and tablets. it's not designed as a computer output like the retards at apple think. (I still have a macbook pro with normal usb, sd card reader and hdmi connector)

>have galaxy s4
>go through 4 different USB cables because the connector loosens over time
>get nexus 6p
>still using same usb c cable over a year later without any issues.

File: 41uobedSW1L._SL1500_.jpg (20KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 500x500px

>>59148432
I have pic related for my nexus, it will charge macbooks and I'm assuming the new mbp. no idea what other USB c laptops support this.

File: razer-blade-stealth-12-470-75.jpg (65KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1200x675px

>>59141245
>External GPU enclosures work with it.
but those don't exist, unless your talking about that shitty razr one which only works with razr laptops

File: 1421090043396.png (16KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 500x500px

>>59142557

File: 155646435428.jpg (164KB, 1240x786px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1240x786px

>>59150683
>not designed as a computer output like the retards at apple think. (I still have a macbook
>retards at apple
>i still have a macbook
>retards
>i

>>59137596
I'm a cheap fuck and will get a second hand unit.

>>59140960
Me too family
And I even have USC C in my phone already
>There are men on this board RIGHT NOW without USB C