>almost 10 years old cpu having a better OC than Ryzen Why

I see, you want Netburst special edition do you?

Only retarded gamers care about OC.

File: 1486441200084.jpg (19KB, 239x207px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 239x207px

>A four-core overclocking better than an eight-core is somehow news
>Intel shills acting as if Ryzen 7 is competing with non-HEDT i7's

File: 2444338.png (106KB, 407x390px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 407x390px

>tfw phenom will never come back

hahaha faggots i rock on my fx 6300 and i can play youtube videos at 1080p without any problems how does it feel to spend all that money to watch youtube :^^^^^^) xxx

File: amd1.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59113581
DELET DELET DELET

>>59113674
When bulldozer came out amd's marketing capaign was how it can OC to 8+GHz on LN2.

>>59113831
So now AMDrones are saying the Ryzen 7 is NOT for gaming?
I don't get it

Can I disable half the cores and OC to a decent amount instead?

>>59114815
Wow it's almost like there's multiple people with different interests advocating it

>>59114868
I see, so it's the RX480 fiasco all over
>before the release
>IT'S THE 1080 KILLER FOR $200

>after the release
>it's b-better than the 1060 at 2015+ games

>>59114462
It's good publicity, overclocking contests do exist and that set a record.

>>59113894
phenom was a mistake

>>59115219
letting you on the internet was a mistake

File: getrekkedintel.jpg (329KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1920x1080px

>>59113581
because clock speed isn't everything, also you're a faggot

>>59114815
>So now AMDrones are saying the Ryzen 7 is NOT for gaming?
nice strawman
he just said it's 4 cores vs 8 cores
also
>4 cores better for gaming
kek
shitty meme
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-02/cpu-skalierung-kerne-spiele-test/

>>59113581
>not netburst
Underage b&

>>59116589
>nazi
>reliable review

File: 1469877426690.png (124KB, 358x272px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 358x272px

>>59117164
>Your source doesn't count because it's not from my favorite first world country

>>59113581
It doens't work like that. But I wouldn't expect the average /g/ poster to know that.

>daily reminder that the people shilling for 4 cores are the same people that shilled for 2 cores in the past

>daily reminder than an intel shill showed a benchmark in gtaV where r7 1700 at 3.0ghz performed 3fps under 7700k at 5.0ghz

>>59116589
>comparing a x700K at stock speeds with 8 cores intel cpus
nice meme