Who /FX/ here in 2017? >Intel will never ever have such

still have an fx-4100 :(

File: fuckreddit.jpg (1MB, 2740x1821px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2740x1821px

>>59109444
FX 8350 at the top
FX 4350 at the bottom

Soon going to upgrade them both, though, to whatever bottom Ryzen 5 and a ryzen 3.

>>59109444
The FXs aren't even that old though. I still have a computer that has a Phenom II in it.
My main computer does have an 8350 in it though. I'll probably replace it with a Ryzen at some point, and move the 8350 into my home server.

>>59109444
I have a 9590... not sure why I bought this. I've got an 1800X on the way though.

>>59109444
If encoding is most important from the tasks about which you care, it has pretty good bang for buck.

I bought an fx 57 back in the day over an opteron 165. I've had a 8350 for the past few years.

File: GOAT.png (402KB, 1200x1422px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1200x1422px

>>59109444
Nope, still part of the /Thuban/ master race. The four module FX chips aren't even an upgrade over my 1090T with its six beautiful real cores.

>>59109444
Me.
I have a FX 8320 OC'd to 4.5GHz and a FX 6300 at stock.

They both behave well, I don't think I'll replace them any time soon.

>>59109444
fx 6300 here, Ryzen 5 will set me free

File: SCvxd2R.png (818KB, 1677x2550px) Image search: [Google]

818KB, 1677x2550px

>>59109444
I have a personal computer with an underclocked 8350 because it was overheating in a game that actually made use of all 8 cores.

Trying to decide whether it's worth it to get the 1700x or the 1700, waiting for benches, and if it's disappointing in games, waiting for and getting the 1600x instead. That base 3.6 with 4.0 clock will be awesome.

It's so cute to see all the revisionists coming out pretending the FX was ever good.
Fuck off tards.

>>59109928
1700 should have ~33% more performance in fully multithreaded apps
1600 should have higher overclocking potential due to lower thermal output

>>59109945
Its the best cheap processor for work you can get until Ryzen

Unless you shill more for 8 cores Intels, like a lot more

File: 1482960021461.png (151KB, 523x489px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 523x489px

>>59109959
I already figured this. All that's left is to see where the 1700/1700x stands in vidya lames. We'll see in 3 days.

File: 1488015894872.jpg (63KB, 582x728px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 582x728px

>>59109444

>>59109444
I have a 9370 and like >>59109482 I'm not sure why I bought it. Got it for €130 new though.

File: laughingslut.gif (278KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 640x360px

>>59109444
>he bought a faildozer

FX4300 for 90€. runs just fine here I don't do much other than browsing the internet and doing some light video editing & coding

>>59109559
Problem with Phenom is lack of stuff like AES and particularly SSE4/SSSE3, which are huge for multimedia and even video decoding on CPU.

I had to move from K10 to Piledriver because of x265, which ran at 30% of proper speed due to lack of SSE4, required for the assembly code.

>>59110478
>SSE4/SSSE3
This is one of the main reasons why phenom 2 was shit in pcsx2 when compared to late core2.

>>59109444
FX-8350 here, bought it 3 years ago. Works fine.

>>59109444
>tfw bought an 8350 with a good motherboard, 212evo and 16gb RAM from some /v/ autist
>gave him only $90 for all of it

>>59109470
I'm an intel Xeon fanboy but I have to admit this is fucking badass. You have my respect. I need a setup like this.

FX-6300 here.
I would still be using an Intel Core 2 if it didn't lack AES-NI and USB 3

I've bought a FX-8320 last year.
It is an underclocked 8350 which i can regulate myself (which costs the Intel fags a hundred bucks on top for OC'ing) and plays all modern games just fine.

Stays cool as well :)

>>59109444
Gifted it to a friend, sitting on a 2400S. I regret about it, just a little.

File: Cuck2.png (366KB, 1144x888px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1144x888px

>ITT: Self-indulging AMD babbys

Using a 8370 that I bought in 2014. Still handles everything I throw at it. I got it super cheap too.

My younger brother's friend bought Phenom II x6 (1055T). Paired with GTX 1050 and 8GB DDR3, almost every game werks pretty fine. Phenom II CPUs were superb.

>>59109444
>not Ryzen
Are you a degenerate homosexual?
Do you want me to deposit my impregnating fluids in your anus for recreational purposes?

>>59109444
FX-8350 here

Not upgrading because I'm poor and well I don't need either, I don't do anything this cant handle

Stock fx8350 with a Gtx 1080

File: Desktop Speccy Use.jpg (113KB, 893x587px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 893x587px

Phenom II user here also. FX cpus ran older games like shit. timing/jerking issues. The cpu patches/game tweaks,etc never worked. (Had FX 8300 w/same mobo,ram.graphics config) Dropped the Phenom back in and all timing/jerking issues vanished. Now if all I did was non gaming tasks then the FX would be perfect. So it'd make a good server/workstation cpu which is why I kept the fx 8300 (plus i got it on sale at the newegg). Will continue to use my trusty phenom II till it dies (I have a spare just in case)

File: spics.png (66KB, 642x575px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 642x575px

>>59111109
Waiting for Ryzen 5, fps fluctuates too much and there are dips where the cpu is at 100% and GPU go 0% then back to 100%, tipical bottleneck.

>>59110478
thats true, I cant encode videos at 1080p because it will simply take hours, totally destroying flow of work. I own a 965 and many times I had to wait for game patches to remove the need for SSE4

Who else /Core2Quad/ here?

File: c23.png (29KB, 449x439px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 449x439px

FX 6300 @4.4ghz here

I've had it for 4 years

>>59113564
3 years*

>>59109453
Me too...sitting on my monitor base.

Fx 630p here. Had it clocked at 4.3ghz but recently had pull my cmos and too lazy to ckock it back. This is where xfr would be nice for lazy dudes

what motherboards, you fags got?
FX6100 on a 970A-G43

The funny part: inside a Corsair T-600, bitches.

>>59109444

FX 6300 hara, bought it on 2013 so im happy about the multicore performance until now, obviously upgrading to ryzen

>>59109444
6300 here, bought in 2013. Bottlenecking the shit out of my 480, gonna upgrade soon to Ryzen maybe.

File: 1484486397990.gif (481KB, 499x315px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 499x315px

i only recently built my comp, new to computers, i have a fx 4300, was looking at upgrading within the FX family, since im not surei want to buy a am4 processor.

but how come the FX line power consumption is so high.

>>59113912
I happen to have the same Motherboard.
Got it hooked up with 16gb of ddr3 1333 ram and a 480 and a 8320

Works like a Charm, all the connectors i need and much space.
Only con i have is the placenent of the CPU PCI.
Thats too far off to have nice and tidy cable Management.

>>59115507

i mean am4 motherboard

>tfw 4300 + gtx 660

hell ain't got shit on the temp in my room during summer

>>59115507
You don't upgrade 'within' FX series.
Do yourself a favour and buy Ryzen. It will triple your performance.

>>59116181
Why though?
If you dont want to brag with cinebench Benchmarks or utilize heavy Single core Performance the fx series is cheap and potent.

I had an fx 8320e 4.7ghz all cores with a Kraken X61 and oh boy it produced some heat,and it was shit for gaming, at least in various games, i jumped to an i5 6600k and a puny evo 212 and holy shit night and day difference on stock clocks!!!! Now for Ryzen i will wait for REAL benchmarks. So yeah the AMD FX was good for winters.

>>59109444
I always wanted an FX. Maybe once Ryzen drops the old stock will be on fire sale in a year.
>>59109470
>Your setup will never be this cool
Why even live?

>>59116553
>e Version

Thats where things went wrong m8

File: speccy yo final.png (49KB, 861x714px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 861x714px

Not for much longer - ryzen will be mine.

>>59116959
¿Really? i thought the "e" edition was the more "energy effcient" version,since all the FX are the same except for the factory stock clocks and since this cpu was rated for 95w well i guess i need to learn more.....

6300, was my first gaming pc ever and I'm a poorfag. Sidegraded to an itx build with i3 7100, and the fx 6300 pc is a minecraft/file server. Will upgrade to 7700 or 8700 or possibly even Ryzen like in a year or so, and possibly even going to turn the 7100 build into a router.

>>59117062
The e editions are just down clocked versions of the originals

>>59109444
Still rocking 6300

File: file.png (34KB, 492x325px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 492x325px

FX-8370 master race.

Nope dodged fail dozer with a 3570k.

>>59109444

Still using a i7-920 bought in 2008.

No need to upgrade here.

>>59117784
Show cpu-z bench in comparison to 8350.
Single and Multi thread.
I guess the 8350 can be selected there.

File: workaround.jpg (248KB, 1024x1344px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1024x1344px

>>59109444
Nigga I'm phenom II x4 955 and intel n450

>>59109444
>tfw, FX-8150
Waiting for Ryzen

>>59118209
Wew.
If this thread lasts for another 5 hours or more i'm going to make the same with my 8320 non-e.

What else are you using?

Im going 8320, 16gb 1333, 480 8gb

>>59109444

FX 8320 clocked @ 4.3 here.

Does everything i throw at it, lags bad in games my rx 470 but its quite ok.

File: 1463587172357.gif (1001KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 640x480px

>>59109444
>excellent price to performance
>top end model gets BTFO by a dual core I3

>>59118414

>8320e @ 4.7 opm 1.428v
>silver arrow to cool it
>M5A99x (only rated for 140w)
>290x
>12gb of 1600mhz ram at fuck knows timings

File: a24fe3d1ea151e5f1eea12f8ccc2fd5f.jpg (110KB, 482x1033px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 482x1033px

>FX
>Good
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

File: 2936326.png (70KB, 523x440px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 523x440px

>>59118480

>meanwhile, in 2016

>>59118455
Okay, thats somewhat compareable.
Will deliver in 5-6hours

>>59109470
Are you preparing to make a crypto mining station, bro?

File: amd.png (45KB, 2000x770px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 2000x770px

>>59109444

FX-8320 + HD 7870 today.

Going R7 1700X + RX 480 soon

File: amdcuck.png (38KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 660x525px

>>59109444
nah

bought my phenom II back in 2010 and it's been rolling right along fine ever since. really though depending on what you do with the pc you might be in good shape with what cpu you got now. gaming for ex, say your pulling 60+ fps with AA/AF enabled and high res. why upgrade? Seems to me you'd be wasting your money. Sooner or later your gonna hit a wall fps wise, either the game will be fps locked (60) or it will be running so fast to make it unplayable and hurt your eyes. Now adding more ram/or swapping your boot drive to a ssd will give benefits.

fx6300 here
and its been really good to me for years.

I might upgrade to ryzen but honestly the 6300 is good enough probably for a few more years for me. I still never OC'd it and its got a stock cooler. its got room to grow

>>59118681
you probably do some very basic tasks like web browsing and thats probably it, A core 2 duo would do you just fine

Hell core 2 duo is probably more powerful than the fx6300

>>59118703

>Hell core 2 duo is probably more powerful than the fx6300

No, no its not.

>>59118703
I play some games. It handles DOOM, rocket league, and factorio without lag. DOOM is pushing it but it plays fine
I also do some pretty extreme web browsing, 60+ tabs open all the time.

fx6300 is a beasty little processor. a core 2 duo definitely would not have handled the shit I've thrown at this stock fx6300

>>59118832

>I also do some pretty extreme web browsing, 60+ tabs open all the time.

Web browsing cares more about ram.

>>59118681
stock cooler on my 6300 would hit jet turbine levels on medium-high loads (minecraft client + separate server) and hit 50-55C
replaced it with a 212 sink + nf14 fan and the same load hits 40-43C at a quiet 900 rpm

the old amd stock coolers are pretty garbage.
but otherwise it's the same for me; the fx6300 is still adequate

>>59118480
Look at the performance of that steaming pile of shit. It runs like ass on the """best""" cpu's. You aren't trying very hard.

>>59116387
it's 5-6 fucking years old and the modules basically mean 8 low ipc power hungry cores.

there's gonna be a r5 and r3, save yourself anon

>>59119121
Power consumption is not an Argument.
Power is too fucking cheap to be one.
Heat isn't one too. My fx stays cooler than i7 house fire cpus.
I just want to play a bit of vidya here and there.

>>59119068

Its why the wraith cooler is so important - its basically as good as the evo 212 (which has hit meme status these days) plus it hits the recent OMG RGB IT GLOWS trend. Wraith on low TDP (65w or lower) chips gives actual decent overclocking headroom which puts AMD in a strong position.

>>59119171

I do embrace the delidlake meme, but come on, even the most tryharding amd fanboys will agree overcloked fx (or some stock ones) should have your local fire dept on a speed dial

>>59110691
Intel supports Feminist Frequency. That's the only reason I buy AMD.

>>59119231
I agree that you can't overclock with the Stock cooler.
I've got the pure Rock from be quiet! and got my 8320 running at 3,7ghz. It is at 25-27 degrees C at idle, under load 50.
Maybe i will overclock later on to try it out.

How far can I push my 8320 amd bros?

File: delta-afb1212vhe.jpg (88KB, 587x581px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 587x581px

>>59119509

If it has 2 fans the dark rock is good for 4.5ghz to the 4.7ghz wall fx hit. Beyond that point the fact the fan profile be quiest users for its low low noise output isn't enough to handle higher clocks. If you had airport level of fans (delta yo) the heatsink is good for 5ghz).

>>59119640
4,5 is enough for me.
Which voltage did You use?

>>59119985
1.49

>>59109470
What is the name of those speakers you have?

>>59119985

1.428v when testing IBT for 2hrs. Really I should stress test for 12-24hrs but I doubt my mobo could withstand it. Still for "vidya stable" it is more than enough.

I suspect my chip is good for 5ghz based on a little testing but my mobo is in no way capable of handling the voltage. If I had a sabertooth or crosshair then 5ghz on air would be within reach.

>>59109470
Where do your legs go?

>>59120803

>what is wireless

Ignoring input lag of course.

File: 1477669159749.jpg (98KB, 719x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 719x720px

>>59109470
>AMD FX processors
>motherboards with video outputs

Pick one you lying nigger faggot.

>>59121161
B-B-B-BUSTED

I'm still using Phenom ii

>>59109444
Primary has an 8120 @ 4GHz, with a failing AKASA X4 for cooling. Fan bearings completely fucked. I remember at the time the i5s where about £160, whilst I managed to get an 8120 for around £95. Still runs everything perfectly fine

Project computer has an Phenom X4 :} Always loved that naming scheme

>>59121847
Phenom is only 2.3ghz though :<
Once I get money, and a reason to, I'll retire it and use the 8120 as the project machine.

>>59121893

Bulldozer is a bitch of a chip but to this day for the likes of boincing and home server usage it remains without equal at the same clocks. I plan to use my vishera chip as a home server when I retire it.

That or I will bolt a delta fan to its twin tower cooler and do a a suicide benchmark run on air cooling in preparation of ryzen. 1.5v and 5ghz or bust (given I have two 3900rpm delta fans cooling isn't a problem, even if I go deaf).

File: 1488053905134.png (414KB, 654x702px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 654x702px

Fx 8350, no real issues

File: P_setting_fff_1_90_end_500.jpg (50KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x500px

>>59121161
Those boards exist.

>>59109444

I have a very nice 9590 build that I don't have the heart to get rid of. I'm getting rid of my 5960X build first, in favor of the 1800X.

Have a 6300 I've been using since 2013 along with a 970. I'll probably upgrade next year.

File: 8320.png (88KB, 1240x409px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1240x409px

>>59118209
my 8320 isn't as powerful as your 8320E
But I'm sure i could power him up when i add 1ghz to his clock speed

File: killme.png (29KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 403x402px

>>59123274
Only way i can get 4.0 stable with my 8320
>SEND HELP

File: 474583412.png (15KB, 576x252px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 576x252px

>having to upgrade your cpu more than once every 5 years

1100T+1080ti masterrace

>>59123312

You've hit a voltage wall. Only way to get moar clocks is MOAR POWA and that generally hitting the point where air cooling stops on top tier boards.

Its worth noting that roughly every batch of vishera from the 'e' chip release onwards is good for 5ghz if you can cool it - I forget the specific batch number but the process is mature as fuck.

File: blazingfastperformance.png (24KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x399px

>he fell for the amdpoojeet meme
lul

File: goy7killer.png (14KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x399px

>>59123423

File: Capture.jpg (49KB, 414x417px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 414x417px

still got my FX-8350 im hoping im able to upgrade to an 1800x

FX 8320 Here. I remember going insane with the OCing back in summer of 2013 when i got it but I stopped and have been running stock since the only game I play is CS:S

Wish I kept my 8150

File: 1369262077761.png (100KB, 342x245px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 342x245px

>>59109470
>manly tears lifts

>>59120106
Trash walmart blackweb box speakers.
>>59124351
What?
>>59121161
Stop pretending to be retarted, pls.
>>59120803
>He isn't a midget sitting on a stool with his feet on the middle level.
Check your privilige, giantard.
>>59110581

What does liking Xeon have to do with it?

>>59116781
I think my battlestation has become bait. Goal for that and you're golden.
>>59118519
Nah bruh

Welp, treated that like a battlestation thread.

File: 1getj5.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

I still USE A FUCKING PHENOM II x840 in 2017

K I L L M E

File: someshit.png (18KB, 455x396px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 455x396px

>>59109444

FX-6300 here, waiting for Ryzen 1600x

File: amd.png (914KB, 676x600px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 676x600px

>>59109444
love my fx

>>59124768

just why??

>>59124817
Everything has gone wrong in my life.

>>59124842

dude even my dog has enough money to get an FX

>>59124848
I don't know if it's worth upgrading. It's working for me so far. What benefit will I see?

>>59124864
>I don't know if it's worth upgrading.

actually not, just wait for Ryzen R5

File: hot.png (47KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 660x525px

>>59115591
You are like little baby, watch this.

>>59124768
Have you tried unlocking the two other cores? The 840T is based on a full six core Thuban die. I'm using a 1090T at 4GHz and it's still a great CPU.

8320 here. Running in an aio cooker at 4.4ghz. Cracking cpu, can't see any reason to upgrade.

File: 1486272167753.jpg (53KB, 529x644px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 529x644px

>>59109482
i also have a 9590...

I just sold my FX 8350+mobo a while back for 250€.
The chip was pretty good as it could do 4.5 ghz at 1.38v

>>59120803
if you look at the carpet, that anon stands to use his computer.

Still using a FX-4100 at stock clocks with stock cooler. It's pretty shit but I am finally going to upgrade this year. I actually don't have too bad a time gaming surprisingly. Especially in games using vulkan and dx12. (read: none)

>>59109453
6300 reporting in

>>59113564
3 years reporting in. I only run mine at 4.2. Pretty happy with it for 160 aus bucks

>>59124773
same. but I have a gtx970 and my ram is 1866