>low lighting
>just take a screenshot of the viewfinder
>looks better than the camera pic
wtf kots can't take pictures
>what is ISO
>>59106971
What do game rips have to do with this?
>>59106971
Image Stabilization Optics
Wrong
>>59106897
>low lighting
>have Sony A7S
>ISO 50000, go
why hasn't there been more improvements in low light tech? also is there a physical limit for how good film can get for low light?
>>59108683
It's called a flash.
>>59109848
Phone camera "flash" is good for 5 feet. Camera flash washes everything out.
>>59108683
Film? uuuh. sensors nowadays. and they're constantly getting better. IMO optimization for low iso's is better than for higher ones. I'd rather have great low iso performance and shit high than mediocre both.
>>59109866
try off camera flash and bam, great pictures in low light.
>>59109866
kys.
Phones are neat for taking a quick snapshit. But if you worry so much about image quality you should learn some basic photography.
For nice lighing try to create indirect light with the flash.
And for gods sake, don't use the horrible on-camera flash, it just gives everyone red eyes.
>>59106897
cats have superior eyesight and reflexes
they'd make great photographers
send 'em to warzones, good riddance
just use the brightness slider
>>59106971
Not to mention the photo is smaller and at a lower resolution, so grain won't show up
>>59106897
That's why you don't buy Sony.
>>59110222
I can't be bothered to check exif data, with what did you take it?
>>59111299
Based on the motion blur, I'd say 2-5s shutter speed, iso 100, F3-5.6.
>>59110222
that looks comfier than it should 2bh
>>59111496
>comfy
But of course, it's a blue-collar castle mate.
>>59106897
That's a fucking dumb idea. You could manually edit the lighting/noise out later and get a much better picture.
>>59110222
Probably a Fujifilm I'm guessing.
POST KOT
>>59113399
>>59106897
>Not using film
retard
>>59113476
Holy shit, fucking kill yourself, hipsterfaggot.
>>59111299
doesn't 4chin delet exif data to keep anonimity? I wanted to know what camera that anon used.
>>59113527
EXIF are kept only on /p/
>>59113527
fujifilm ax300
for some reason I wanted something with aa batteries
>>59110139
This^
OP is retarded.
>>59108683
>why hasn't there been more improvements in low light tech
there have been HUGE improvements actually.
>>59113351
>knowing which camera took a picture shared on a mongolian frog rape victim imageboard
is this the power of /p/?
>>59113543
yeah, I thought so
>>59113543
>fujifilm ax300
>google it
>point and shoot
im impressed anon! did you edit these photos?
>what is tripod @ISO100
>>59106994
Do you know what ISO is or are you just joking?
I am legitimately curious.
>>59113399
This is now a kot thread
>>59113778
it's the 'tripod/night' preset, resized only
>>59113803
what did he saw
>>59113811
Your mom naked.
>>59106971
>what is noise
>>59113399
Three doubles confirm a new кoт thread.
>>59114238
>>59114266
>>59114289
>>59114306
>>59108683
Sony mirrorless cameras are already here.
>>59114324
>>59114342
>>59114358
>low lighting
>f/1.8 prime
>never worry again
>>59114368
>>59114382
>>59114399
>>59114413
>>59114436
>>59114454
>>59114469
>>59114486
>>59114501
>>59106897
>>59114514
>>59114540
>>59114551
These are lovely kot pics.
>>59114530
ozzeh?
Dumb kitposters, off your're selves
Photos taken at night without flash or being shooped
>>59115263
Maybe in Australia
>>59115274
These are from the Judean Mountains
>>59106897
DUMB KOTPOSTER
Wow literally never see any photography discussions here. I recently picked up a Sony A7R II.
Haven't got to mess with the low light environment too much yet and I have a shit kit lens but otherwise it's an amazing camera.
>>59115977
Actually, I started this thread thinking of smartphone cameras but oh well.
>>59113783
Only useful for landscape.
>>59106971
International Standards Organization
>>59106971
Interchangeable Scalable Orchitecture
>>59116728
then use off camera flashes or a better camera (A7SII)
>>59116728
any subject that doesn't move.
such as card, product photography, everything except for movement.
>>59113527
>4chin delet exif data
they almost certainly strip it and shove it into their database backend, but the images served to users don't retain EXIF.
>>59118306
cars*
>>59110138
There's no grass in that world
I can't find the picture of kot with rabbit ears, I just saw it yesterday when looking for another file. I hate when this happens.
>>59106897
higher iso, shoot raw, go to >>>/p/ faggot
>What is exposure
>>59106971
International Science Olympiad
>>59108683
>why hasn't there been more improvements in low light tech?
there....has been?
New cameras have way higher ISO capabilities than those of 10 years ago. Fast lenses are cheaper too.
>>59106897
Raise your ISO by a reasonable level, not too much to make your shot a grainy piece of shit
Open your aperture as much as possible to let as much light in as possible
Lower your shutter speed to let more light in
Raise the light exposure levels as you wish
Blammo, you now have better lighting in your shots. Cameras nowadays even show you how your settings will affect the lighting of your shots.
>>59106971
Illicit Semen Oni