So with all this talk of Ryzen, who wants to bet that there won't

>>59102364
>integrated graphics
Oh anon you so funny.

But seriously, the Zen+Vega APUs coming out will shrek Intel integrated garbage and still put out decent CPU speeds.

>>59102404

If it can't beat a gtx1080 then it will just be another poor man's video card.

>>59102433
>If I can't find a reason to buy it, it's useless

Autism incarnate.

>>59102490

Lol some of us want a solid card, not just the pretty good option. If Vega can run 60fps @ 4k then it will shut up the haters. Otherwise it's a waste of hype

>>59102364
>1. Beat a 7700k in any benchmark
It does in anything that scales decently with cores and thread
If you're talking singlethread benchmarks, it doesn't really matter. The performance are great enough, and the additionnal cores allow you to multitask with no impact in shitty programs that don't use more than 4 cores

>>59102364
>2. Also have integrated graphics
Why would you want this on a high end CPU

I remember when sandy bridge came out everyone was complaining about this but now children think it's a good feature WTF

There will be raven ridge for people who wants APUs

>>59102611
>gpu doesn't work
>good luck

>>59102715
Just have a backup GPU

Y-You're old enough to have build more than 1 computer r-right?