Intel >i3 i5 i7 AMD >r3 r5 r7 NVIDIA >GTX 1050, 60,

So consumers are able to quickly see what they compete with.

Zionist conspiracy

>>59096247
amd: a4, a6, a8, a10
intel: i3, i5, i7

why is intel worse than amd?

>>59096247
>Also why 3 5 7 for Intel to begin with?
Prime numbers.

it shows how many cores it has
Pentium ->one
Core Two -> two
i3 -> three
i5 -> five
i7 -> nine

File: 1484335009252.jpg (140KB, 906x993px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 906x993px

>>59097359

Because "8350X" was a stupid name that confused consumers, "FX" didn't differentiate enough, and "Athlon" is perceived as low end

>>59097410
Duron and Sempron are the low end AMD names.

>>59097433
>perceived

>>59097433
Athlon is low end. All of AMD is low end. The only way to get real performance is to use an i7 with a minimum of 16GB RAM and an NVidia 1070

>>59097485
>he can't afford a 1080

>>59097485
The 480 is upper-mid-end. There's more than just low end and top 1%, anon.

>>59097597
The 480 is mid tier. Don't spew bullshit

>>59097932
No, the 460 and 1050(Ti) are mid-end. A giant chunk of the market is for garbage OEM adapters and older cards.

>>59096333
You mean Intel:C,N,Z,X3, X5, X7.

>>59097953
Those are low end, good cards but still low end.