AMD has, and always will be, a poorfag's cheap knock-off

>>59084545
Pretty much. They used to literally clone Intel processors and resell them under their own name.

AMD is just hot trash and Ryzen is no different.

Shitlake buyers in maximum damage control overdrive

>>59084597
they never did this

File: 1330551243159.jpg (19KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x400px

>>59084597
>Am386
>Am486
>Am5x86
>K5
>K6
>Athlon
>Athlon XP
>Athlon 64
>Athlon 64 x2

Intel sets the rules, AMD plays it better...always
Blame them for actually trying to innovate, drones, while your heavily modified P6 arch tries to chug along

>Your denial is showing...

File: 250px-AMD_486_DX2_66_NV8T_Front.jpg (11KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x250px

>>59084749
Yes they did.
Literally 1:1 copy of Intel, but with AMD branding on it.

And this was after Intel stopped supplying them with the x86 design for newer processors.

AMD has always been a cheaper imitation of Intel.

File: 1478222355418.jpg (55KB, 849x656px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 849x656px

incel asshurt is reaching fever pitch already. the leak about ryzen having higher ipc seems to have really annoyed. cannot wait for feb 28.

>>59085097

this. i can;t believe shilltell has so many fans after the shit they pulled

File: 1474830919633.jpg (126KB, 492x492px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 492x492px

>>59084545
>being this assannihilated

File: 1429833019366.gif (984KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 500x280px

>>59084640
Full Drive Exceed, Blaster-3 limit break.

So many mad shitlake buyers

>>59085061
AMD first to 1Ghz
First dual core
First 64 bit instruction set

It's like Intel doesn't try except to keep shrinking their transistors

>>59084545
D A M A G E C O N T R O L

File: 1487801576360.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>59084545

>>59085061
>AMD is a improved close of jewtel
YUP

>>59088412
>first 64 bit instruction set
That's wrong and you know it.

>>59088487
Your reading comprehension is fucked.
Go see a doctor.

File: 1471477567253.jpg (120KB, 670x1000px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 670x1000px

>>59084545

ripping on /vg/ with their xbones and piss4s as well as amd fanboys, excellent.

>>59084545
>AMD has, and always will be, a poorfag's cheap knock-off product.
I buy products for the quality and my own budget. That I can get a better deal on AMD side than Intel side doesn't make me a poorfag, makes me a rational agent.

>>59088964
First backwards compatible 64 bit ISA, the IA-64 is not backwards compatible.

>>59089091
Who gives a shit?
>>59088412 is still wrong.

>>59085157
I said it once ill say it again.

Intel at first ass raped them
Then they started to bleed
after a while, they didn't really care because there was no real alternative
around the 4000 series they started to like it
But then amd came around with big beautiful tits and a perfect ass and all she askes is we take her out to dinner and she will put out.
They started to remind them that there is in fact a dick in their ass and that they were straight
some people can't handle realizing they were fucked for that long
so they try to deny they were fucked at all with the dick still firmly lodged in their ass.

in a few months, and after all the suicide prevention center lines and rape survivor groups settle down, it will be business as usual, with intel constantly trying to get back inside, but hopefuly this time, they get a vagina first and wine and dine us

>>59089294

You seem pretty obsessed with dicks.

>>59085061
>Intel sought an injunction against AMD’s release of the Am386; however, any injunctive relief depended on the ongoing 1987 arbitration’s outcome, since the arbitration would decide whether AMD should be awarded a license to the 80386. Because the district court was required to stay Intel’s copyright action against AMD pending the outcome of Intel’s appeal of the 1992 arbitration award to the Superior Court of California, the Am386 effectively survived the injunction. Intel v. AMD, 12 F.3d at 910. The Am386 became a commercial success; not only was it faster than the Intel 80386 that it was based on, it was almost as fast as Intel’s newest 486 microprocessor but at a lower price. Desperate to keep the Am386 off the market, Intel even sued AMD for trademark infringement of the “386” name, but failed to prove that such a simple numerical combination was not generic. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 756 F.Supp. 1292, 1293 (N.D. Cal. 1991). Since deciding to go solo with the 80386 in 1985, Intel made it obvious that it would explore every last legal action available to keep AMD out of the x86 microprocessor business. When one litigation stalled or was lost, Intel simply sued on different grounds in an attempt to exhaust AMD’s legal resources. Intel’s legal battle with AMD became a perpetual drain on resources for both parties. By 1994, Intel had navigated the arbitration along its long journey up to the Supreme Court of California. The Supreme Court awarded AMD “a permanent, nonexclusive and royalty-free license to any Intel intellectual property embodied in the Am386” and “a two-year extension of certain patent and copyright licenses . . . related to the Am386.

Intel has never been able to compete fairly.

>>59084545

Brand =/= product =/= price

competition is healthy

>>59089570
>using =/= on a tech board
>help guise what is !=

>>59089112
Well considering itanium was a unmitigated disaster in literally every way, and it forced Intel to license AMD64 I would say that Intel probably cares.

>>59084545
Doesn't Sony just buy Sharp and LG (OLED) panels for their TVs anyway? And Sharp is owned by Hon Hai.

File: intel-post-ryzen.png (246KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 800x612px

>>59084545
>>59084597

>>59084755
>>Am386
no different from their Intel equivalents that were already old news at the time performance-wise, the DX-40 was great in the low end however
>>Am486
ditto, except there was nothing memorable, both the DX-40 and DX2-80 were miserable, overheating and unstable failures
>>Am5x86
for most of their lifetime the slowest, shittiest new x86 chips you could buy and 5th generation in name only, just a hotted-up clock-quadrupled 486
>>K5
hopelessly outclassed by the time it made it to market at 75 and 90 MHz PR ratings by Cyrix and Intel chips that were breaching 166 MHz and beyond, few people ever bought one
>>K6
great integer performers, great value for business users but never the fastest nor that competitive with the Intel high-end, slow as shit board-mounted cache
>>Athlon
not good until thunderbird; they were first to that magic four-figure clock speed through cache gimping, the slot Athlons after the 650 were trash

the last three were good all around (except maybe the disappointment that was the Athlon MP), easily AMD's golden age in which they were competitive in more than just the low-end, and their only genuine case of that "innovation" you're alluding to, since the K5 was built on NexGen tech they didn't invent, merely bought.

>heavily modified P6 arch tries to chug along
that died with Yonah, don't regurgitate memes you have no understanding of

>>59085061
>Intel beat AMD to market by nearly four years, but AMD priced its 40 MHz 486 at or below Intel's price for a 33 MHz chip, offering about 20% better performance for the same price.

Wow, Intel jewry is truly timeless.

>>59085061
everything after the 286 with an AMD logo in it is actually their own design work

>>59090216
good thing too otherwise nobody would have bought it, the 486DX-40 was terrible

Intel was indeed very jewy until the DX/2-66 era though, they had the industry by the balls and they knew it

File: 1487776099397.png (459KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 600x800px

>>59084597
>>59084545
Meme masters right here.

Full damage control goys.

>delet dis ploys

Nvidia may be related. Idk we will see how vega turns