I understand competition is good and we need cucks to purchase

>>59083198
My desktop is running a quad-core amd cpu and Im fine with it because I dont waste my life playing video-games. Id rather shitpost on /g/.

Most people promoting these consumerist threads are likely not going to do anything productive with a fancy Intel cpu either. So fuck off OP.

>>59083198
Brand loyalty huh. I usually go with Intel, but every once in awhile AMD stages a comeback and offers something competitive, and I'll usually jump over.

>>59085051
>only games need good CPUs
are you mentally challenged?

>>59085192
So salty. This is /g/, so we demand more of our computers. I see people arguing that everyone require an expensive Intel cpu, then turning around and mocking mac users for their $3000 Facebook machines.

Most users are plebs that don't require half the computing power that they have, that's why price/performance is important.

>>59085242
Wut. Fast single-threaded performance is the FIRST thing you should look into a computer after adding it good RAM. Intel does that exceptionally.

>>59085192
No but you are from the looks of your reading comprehension skills. I said everyone starting these stupid threads are NEETs who do not need them for anything besides games.