Is it morally wrong to spend Bitcoin available in a collided-generated

>>59069955
if you happened to make a key that fit into the lock of a random house, is it morally wrong to steal all their shit?

>>59070209

Yes. But the property of a house is nominal and not assigned by a key of any kind but instead, among others, by contracts and similar instruments.

The property of a Bitcoin address is assigned, by definition, to the owners of its multiple private keys, in part because of its anonymous nature.

People who use this technology are and must be aware that property is shared with other users, in fact, with all other users who can solve a mathematical problem.

Yet, collision may not be proposital.

Therefore, breaking into houses and colliding Bitcoin addresses are different situations, hence the question continues.

>>59070209
Agreed

>>59071160
Then refute the refutation. >>59070828

>>59069955
If you are literally trading the result to cryptographic problems as such, I guess everyone who has the result can trade it?