>AMD finally has some CPUs that aren't dogshit >WOW

performs worse in what exactly?

>>59064389
>Umm... sweetie, no.

your new is showing shill

>>59064389
how does it feel to be a corporate attached to a brand slut?

Should I buy the 400$ processor, or the 1700$ one?

>>59064389
>actually rooting for the reigning monopoly
wew

You should use other shill tactics on 4chan than on reddit, give me your Operator-Nr., I will contact Mister Shashumdhani and tell him to fire you.

>10-20% worse at 20 dollars cheaper
are you even trying at this point?

>Intel still has the best performing CPUs
true, at least until AMD releases server-grade 20+ core Zen.

File: file.png (172KB, 723x906px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 723x906px

>>59064409
They literally pull the same shit again. They pretend all we do is cherry picked multithreading or 100% video encoding.
The 6900k intel they cherry picked to go against it's a fucking 3.2Ghz to 3.7Ghz processor. I routinely do 4.6Ghz.
The benchmarks the AMD shills post here are "AMD run". Same old shit.

>trying not to regret his last purchase

File: Singlecore.png (18KB, 1008x279px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1008x279px

>>59064389
>>59064595
>muh 8% better single thread per clock

When can this meme stop. This isn't Bulldozer.

>it's a fucking 3.2Ghz to 3.7Ghz processor

It features a 4GHz Turbo on a single thread.

>I routinely do 4.6Ghz.

Source: My anecdotal ass.

We'll see how Ryzen overclocks

File: 1458056598565.png (497KB, 594x598px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 594x598px

>>59064389
>they will always perform the best
>always
That's a strong word there, fanboy.

>>59064389
>Umm... sweetie, no.
back to tumblr with you!

File: 1485294093914.png (4KB, 368x376px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 368x376px

>>59064389