'The Ryzen response: Intel have forgotten how to deal w

>NO REAL WORLD GAME BENCHMARKS

KYS
Y
S

>>59046612
I don't want to go to your website, James.
Just post a screencap of the article.
Or better yet, don't post anything.

>>59046715
CanardPC benched A0 sample and it was decent even at singlethreaded turd such as ARMA3.

>>59046760
this

>>59046612
fuck off retard

>>59046785
Yep. Their 3.15ghz engineering sample was only 10% behind the i7 6900k.
The top binned Ryzen SKU is 3.6ghz base with a 4ghz turbo. Overclocking it to a solid 4ghz is so trivial its basically entirely free performance.

File: Selection_20170221_13:20:06.png (8KB, 369x93px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 369x93px

>>59046826

>>59047068
More concerned with comparisons to the i7-7700k when it comes to games.

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-21 at 7.00.36 AM.png (32KB, 393x129px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 393x129px

>>59047984

>>59046612
>the 15% performance boost you can expect with the upcoming 8th Gen

Nobody actually believes that shit, do they?

File: 2.jpg (89KB, 353x388px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 353x388px

RIP

>intel's response to zen is an overpriced i5 with hyperthreading not arbitrarily disabled on an overpriced new socket
>it's due in fucking August, fucking FIVE MONTHS after the launch of Zen
>it's literally nothing more than a higher overlocking i7 7700k
>their only other response is b-but intel 8th gen goys! 15% improvement in our one biased benchmark just like the 15% we claim Kabylake has over Skylake!

This is incredible. Intel has had this coming for so fucking long. They've been getting BTFO in production, BTFO in the mobile market, BTFO in the memory/SSD market, and they're about to get BTFO in the x86 CPU market. The only thing that would've made it more sweet is if VIA somehow appeared out of nowhere and ended up being the one dishing out BTFO's to everyone.

>>59048622
>The only thing that would've made it more sweet is if VIA somehow appeared out of nowhere and ended up being the one dishing out BTFO's to everyone.
That would be glorious

Lower end Zen chip benchmarks when? Some beaches of the Zen chips at £150~ would be nice

>>59048695
Benches*

>>59048332
~same IPC, moarcorez, moarcachez, not a housefire when OCed. I'd say Ryzen is a better buy unless it's somehow very bad at gaymen.

>>59048740
Ryzen is same IPC as Haswell, not Kabylake.
And Kabylake are clocked about 500mhz higher both stock and likely overclocks.

Also, there are other factors that affect gaming performance. A lot of it is just down to latency.

I know it won't be "very bad" at gaming compared to the 7700k.. but what's it going to be, 3% less FPS? 5%? Will even the 1400X sometimes be actually better? I need to see that but yeah.. have to wait. Sucks.

>>59048740
>>59048332

The difference is they are close enough that the difference in single thread doent matter, but the gains in multi threaded do.

and if canard is anything to go by, "effortlessly hit 5ghz, only held back by validation boards power delivery" likely means that xfr could take it to 5ghz on one or two cores, something that the 7700k only gets to do on around 50% of its cpus, so all around, substantial performance uptick with very little down sides.

>>59048804
Only the 7700k and 6600k are clocked higher, every other chip in the lineup is 3-4ghz

>>59050401
Okay, sure, but the 7700k and 7600k is pretty much all anyone cares about for a high end gaming rig right now so I was comparing to those.

I think there are people that'll pay $100 more because "it gets 3% more FPS in my favorite game I don't believe you about the newer game engines being highly threaded"

>>59048622
LGA 2066 is going to be impossible to sell with the new marketplace that's coming in just a few days.

>>59050537
At the highend sure. but not everyone has the money for that, there are plenty of people who are recommended lower i5s. I think that's the point where the cheaper ryzen5 chips are going to shine in games with added smt.

At the high end though? Free overclocking brings entry price down regardless and opensup the "high end gaming" market to more people combined with multicores often beating higher clocked quad cores in games anyway. The 7700k market is shrinking, the places where it will excel have the 7600k and 6350k for competition.

So many articles written about so few benchmarks being leaked.

Let's assume the 1700X does perform was well as the 5960X, why would AMD sell themselves short with a $400 price tag ?
Obviously AMD has the upper hand here, they can order any/all intel cpus and run their benchmarks against Ryzen - see where they fall in terms of performance and then price their CPUs accordingly.

>>59050657
Ryzen only has 16 PCIe lanes for expansion
That's simply not enough for many workstation and even some gaymers

>>59050745
>needing GPU's at all when AMD is cutting the $/GFLOP for CPU's down to 1/4 what it was

NVIDIOT DETECTED

File: lanes.png (553KB, 1365x2001px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1365x2001px

>>59050745
Nigger please.

>>59048695
from day 1.

>>59050846
This shit annoys me. On the highend chipsets why don't they just make them huge plx bridges, getting the full 24lanes (8x predone for the soc stuff) to the chipset and then having 2x16 off the chip for multigraphics inter communication (not all of that stuff has to go back to the cpu) then all the extra io shit.

Also, aren't there 4 lanes unaccounted for on the z270?

File: why didn't you buy.png (16KB, 633x345px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 633x345px

Why didn't you buy?

>>59051008
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>59048695
The 28th is when the review embargo lifts, so a week.

>>59047068
>Their 3.15ghz engineering sample was only 10% behind the i7 6900k.
It was about 30% behind the 6700k though.

>>59051066
You realize that the 4ghz i7 6700k is clocked nearly 30% higher, right?

>>59051076
Even if you honestly believed that by just increasing the clock 30% you would get 30% more performance, which is a really stupid thing to believe. The 6700k can easily OC to 4.5 on air.

>>59051008
Just buy now it will only get better.

File: firefox_2017-02-21_11-47-18.png (22KB, 664x246px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 664x246px

>>59051008
Easy $500 made the first 2 hours this morning.

I used to be intimidated by the stock market thinking
there's all these smarter people that must know better than me
but nope it's full of dumbasses and so easy u make $500 in 2 hours

>>59051113
Lots of workloads scale very closely with clockspeeds, and no one is saying that Ryzen is limited to sub 4ghz either.
You literally do not have a single point. You're just shilling and trying to spread FUD.

>>59048622

>VIA is proud to announce the first single watt unicore design, that gives similar performance to pentium 4560 processors. But is scalable up to 3 cores with an integrated 2w Mediatek GPU acceleration.

I would buy one immediately.

>>59051144
>Lots of workloads scale very closely with clockspeeds
We are not talking about "lots of workloads" we're talking about games, aka the only thing Intel is still better at.
For anything else you ought have a AMD anyway.

>muh shill
fuck off, the only bench for games we have shows AMD lacking, if you have other benchmarks share or shut the fuck up

>>59051135
Most stock movements are done based on algorithms that factor in all sorts of financial statistics and data. This is good most of the time but in cases like AMD here it would obv fail.

Based on stats and numbers AMD would have looked like a terrible buy a year ago
Based on subjective opinion and knowledge of the field it would be a great buy

As a general rule if the stock you're considering has to do with some field you're very intimate and familiar with you can consider buying.

I would never buy stocks from oil companies or the like that I know nothing about.

File: index.jpg (34KB, 700x382px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 700x382px

>>59051176
I know you suffer from diminished mental capacity, but try to sort this out in your simplistic chimp brain.
Look at the scores.
Look at the clockspeeds of the chips in the same family.
3.15ghz Ryzen less than 3% behind 3.5ghz i5 6600k.
The i7 6900k has an all core turbo of 3.5ghz, has more cache, more cores, and more threads than the mainstream i5. Ryzen is 10%~ behind it.
The 4ghz i7 6700k is only 18% ahead of the i5 6600k.

>>59051200
AMD is currently at a -52 PEG.

It's got to be the hottest stock. I have never seen a company with a billion in quarterly revenue with a PEG nearly that low.
I originally bought 380 @ 2.60 but I bought another 120 this morning. If I had 7 grand more and didn't want to risk not diversifying enough, I'd get another 500. Oh well.

It will likely hit $25 at some point this year and might hit $75+ by 2020.

>>59051391
And if we're going to apply your retard logic a 30% increase in core speed means an exact 30% increase in performance in games.
Except, that is not true. So until otherwise proven by benchmarks Intel still better for games than AMD and AMD is better than Intel at literally everything else.
I use my computer for games and web browsing so I will be going with Intel if the benchmarks after Zen's release remain the same, which they likely will.

It's not that intel hasn't forgotten, Intels marketing is second to none in any industry.

It's just that they have no answer they either doesn't alienate existing customers, or directly addresses the fact that they have gotten so arrogant that they thought they could sit on their laurels and 4 cores for mainstream customers.

They are in a bad spot until next year because AMD priced their chips so aggressively.

>>59051449
Again you're just talking out of your ass being willfully ignorant. Or you actually do have brain problems.
That chart shows very strong clock scaling with chips in the same family with the same core counts.

You're a pathetic little faggot shill pushing an agenda.

>>59051464
The problem is Intel have nowhere to go except bring their prices down.

The "secret tech" they supposedly have hidden away is a meme. They've hit the limits of their architecture and it will take years before they can release a new one.

File: tmp_8598-14864275615481261104280.jpg (178KB, 909x933px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 909x933px

>muh gaymes

of course ryzen is going to wipe the floor with babylake. intel have been complacent for over a decade. now suddenly amd is coming with 14nm chips, double the cores, double the threads while also cutting the prices in half.

fuck intel regardless, go and pump another 250m into SJW projects you fucking kikes, can't wait for the first heads to roll.

>>59051562
BUT INTEL IS GOING TO RELEASE SKYLAKE AGAIN WITH 3% IPC INCREASES LATE THIS YEAR WHAT THEN

>>59047068
4GHz ain't much though. Ryzen needs to hit at least 4.7-4.8GHz to be amazing. Even then it will probably lose in some games to the Kabylels, but it should be very close at least.

>>59052618
if Ryzen could easily reach 4.8 it wouldn't have a base clock of 3.6

at 4.8 it would also blow the fuck out of a 6950x

>>59052662
I don't know what "easily" means to you, if it could hit 4.7-4.8 on a custom water loop I'd be overjoyed.

>>59052662
It would also have a tdp of 180w. That shit just does not fly for oems.

>>59046612
Cool article, love all that hard data..


But does it even matter?
https://pcgamesn.com/amd/amd-zen-vs-intel-core


Jesus that reads like a /g/-sourced article.

I'm curious to see how the temperatures are.

how would slightly overclocked (normal reachable on air stuff w/o turning it into volcano) ryzen compare to slightly overclocked (4.4GHz) 4690k?
on typical gayman usage, no pure multicore stuff

>>59050401
What about the IPC of Ryzen's chips?

File: Capture.png (373KB, 574x450px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 574x450px

>>59052662
;)

As >>59052697 says, it probably will have a high TDP at that clock, but the enthusiast user using water cooling or a fuckhuge noctua cooler doesn't care about that. OEM's care about perf/W, which AMD has for once, consumers care about absolute performance, which they also have this time around.

>>59052795
We won't know until release and real benchies are performed.

>>59052757
>As their new Polaris graphics cards have launched, and with their high-end Vega GPUs potentially taking on the very best of GeForce.

Stopped reading right there. You couldn't make it more obvious even if you tried.

>>59052856
Yeah, from what I've gathered from what engineers have said, it's the low 3Ghz that's the sweet spot for having good performance without using much power.

It sounds like they will be able to clock much higher, but at a much higher increase to voltage relative to the clocks you get.

>>59052662
Ever heard of Sandy Bridge?

File: great scott.jpg (28KB, 460x453px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 460x453px

>>59051175
>(3 x 1w) + 2w

>>59052795
Single threaded it will, depending on the workload, be maybe slightly below Intel.
In anything multithreaded, it'll wipe the floor with the Haswell chip.

>>59051391

Oh that image.

>Hey guys what if we put single core performance games like X3:TC and mix it in to throw off what happens with current multi-threaded games.

Seriously 6700K owner here, and even I can tell this is some funny smelling bullshit.

>>59051449
Buying one of these and running it stock would be almost nonsensical, what will really matter is how far they can OC.

>>59053006
Sandy Bridge only hit 4.6GHz for most silicon.
4.8GHz was only achievable on a select few i7-2600K/2700K and even fewer i5-2500K/2550K

File: once again v shows its technical understanding of hardware.jpg (542KB, 1024x1275px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1024x1275px

>/v/ doesn't understand the implications of the monstrous Integer and Floating Point performance from the passmark leak

>>59048371
kek

I've got a 750w psu and a cooler rated for nearly 300w - my body is ready.

>>59054181
It was more just an example of a CPU overclocking far beyond its stock clocks. As others have said, AMD have a tighter TDP margin than Intel do right now for 8 core CPUs, yet they are clocked higher. Lower clocks for the 4 and 6 core parts could easily be explained by TDP and market segmentation, it gives no real indication of their maximum clock speeds.

>>59054581
Too many people on /g/ and other places make this big point that Sandy Bridge could overclock to 4.7-4.8GHz, but all of them neglect to mention the absurdly high voltages and BCLK multipliers they need to change just to hit 4.7GHz. 4.8GHz was out of the question for a lot of the silicon as well. If you were lucky, you could hit 4.6GHz with minimal headaches and reasonable voltages.

File: 1487649464372.gif (206KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 256x256px

>>59051113
>just increasing the clock 30% you would get 30% more performance

File: Screenshot_20170222-011501.jpg (234KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x1280px

>>59048371
Wtf how did you know he uses a tripcode?
Oh wait...

>>59051008
I wanted to buy back around April last year. I got talked out of it, now I just feel stupid whenever I think about this sort of stuff and don't even want to know how much richer I could have been or could be.

>>59051464
Intel's marketing is shit, hardly better than AMD's. Nvidia is a much better example of a company that's coasted along largely by its marketing.

>>59053079

>Scalable

File: intel overclock2.png (78KB, 1023x502px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1023x502px

>>59054181
retard

>>59050734
Simple.

You have one choice, 400$ Ryzen, or 5% faster 5960X for 1,200$. Do you know a single person who will spend the 800 premium for 5% more performance? That 800 premium is basically the entire rest of a good tier PC.

>>59046612
AMD has always been second best, and that will never change.

File: 1484776960926.jpg (534KB, 1100x1002px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 1100x1002px

Intel is still better than AMD

>>59051008
Got in last year when it was 1.80 but I've been back and forth trading it since then so I didn't get to fully capitalize on last year's growth. Right now averaging at $10 pps

Couldn't be more happier with recent developments

Intel did this same kind of flailing with their shitty Pentium 4.

When AMD was raping the shit out of them by 40% while being cheaper, Intel still kept their heads shoved up their own asses until core 2 stepped in.

Maybe this means Intel will go back to developing chips with their funding instead of feminism.

>>59051436
I strongly urged my gf whos sitting on over 80k at age 25 (trust fund baby) to invest even 1000$ into AMD when they were at around 4$, I REEEEEE every night thinking about her loss. She lets it all sit in a shit yield savings account.

>>59058062
Except for that time when they were faster than Intel.
So why cant that happen again?

>>59058441
OLD NEWS GRANDPA

AMD HAS NOT AND WILL NOT COMPETE

No seriously Intel is like 9 AMDs together, they could probably just pluck an AMD killer out of dusty officer corner.

Its over. Ryzen will be good, but it wont be the best, and thats why it will fail.

>>59058422

Woah there cowboy. Put your own money on the line.

>>59058318
the P4 wasn't actually that far off the A64 in pure performance though, it was just less efficient clock-for-clock, which didn't matter much because they could just push the clocks up

>>59051008

I'm an idiot. Kill me.

>>59058852
When overclocking came into place, Intel went to dust. AMD had more efficient chips that clocked higher and there was always a bargain enthusiast CPU that raped Intel's entire lineup, like the AXP 1700+ 1.46ghz that clocked up to 2.4ghz, mobile Barton chips that went from 1.8ghz -> 2.9ghz, or the socket 939 opteron 165 dual core 1.8ghz that clocked up to 2.9ghz.

Intel just had a bunch of 2.8-3.2ghz chips that went to 3.6ghz and started housefires.

>>59058644
cpus take 3-4 years to come to market, regardless of r&d

>>59058644
Intel does has like 6 different markets tho

>>59058644
That's why they've hit a wall and have been releasing fuck all over the last few years, right? Good goy

>amd is fucking retarded and hasnt made a good cpu since the athlon
>intel gets lazy and sells crap for big bucks because crap will still outperform the best amd chip
>amd actually makes something good
>intel has nothing
really makes ur cranium expand

can wait to see what intel does for the 9xxx series in 2024

>>59051538
My $107 billion market!

>>59051538
T. Mac fag

>>59046612
I'm so ready for my new 1700x. I have never had a nice desktop cpu. Currently running a poorfag fx-6300 with a 970 like a faggot

>>59058827
Its different im poor

Even POWER is competitive in some workloads these days. It's not just AMD doing well, something's rotten in Intel.

>>59051045
How does a review embargo prevent reviewers from making the video beforehand and posting it the day the embargo ends?

>>59059885
Thats what they are supposed to do, retard

>>59059866
What's new?

>>59059893
Yes, but the person I replied to claimed reviews would be out a week after embargo ends

Unless I need to work on my reading comprehension.

>>59054007
This was with an engineering sample only running 3.15ghz or 3.3ghz or something without turbo and such working at that point, from what I understand.

So its looking like the 6700k and 7700k will be the only CPUs that beat them on average in gaming benchmarks, and even then just by like 1-5%.

>>59059905
Oh aight

>>59054007
>>59059911
Oh yeah it says right on it 3.15/3.4. That's really low. That was an early engineering sample.

>>59059905
My bad there. I mean that the review embargo ends on the 28th, so you only need to wait a week. Sorry bout that.

>>59046612
So which of the new CPUs is gonna be i7-7700K equivalent?

>>59051008
always rated them, just didn't have the dosh.

two gravy trains i have missed now, at least this wasn't as big as btc.

>>59046612
Stop hyping this shit you dumbfuck

AMD ALWAYS fails to deliver, you're just making people get extremely disappointed when reality sets in.

>>59051391
>I know you suffer from diminished mental capacity, but try to sort this out in your simplistic chimp brain.
>Look at the scores.
>Look at the clockspeeds of the chips in the same family.
>3.15ghz Ryzen less than 3% behind 3.5ghz i5 6600k.
holy fuck how can you be so condescending while being such an absolute dumbfuck at the same time?

you're comparing an 8/16 to a 4/4...

what the fuck is going on with the world?

>2016
>globalists lost an election
>to a guy who wants to ally with russia
>pizzagate scandal
>democrats imploding
>liberals btfo
>intel gets btfo

>>59060406
Glorious isn't it?

>>59060406
>racists are happy
>poorfags are happy
>world is crumbling around us

>>59060437
>poorfags are happy
wat

>>59060452
AMD is making a decent CPU

>>59060437
Die, elitist libshit. There's no place for you pieces of trash in this timeline's future.

WHY CANT I UPLOAD IMAGES WHAT THE FUCK JAPMOOT

>>59060505
>he doesnt have a 4chan pass
lol what a pleb

>>59060666
Pass can't fix broken servers.

>>59060671
Passbros arent having any issues

>>59060406
>globalists lost an election
>a literal billionaire who made a cabinet out of other billionaires
>/pol/ unironically believe this

Don't you have pedophiles to defend? You filthy degenerate

>>59060698
yes they are, go look at /vip/

>>59060788
milo being a pedo isnt a surprise. all homos are pedos.

>>59060801
No we're not. Enjoy being poor though

>>59060838
Post a pic then.

>>59060843
kill yourself passfag. you literally paid money to shitpost.

>>59060368
Aww look at the little babby shill get mad.
How well threaded each game is is a known factor, you 70 IQ chimp.
Only one game scales really well with additional threads beyond 4, and its The Witcher. That comparison is almost entirely IPC and clockspeed.

>>59060918
actually it is watch dogs 2.

Lmao. We all know this ryzen shit will fail like every AMD product. Stop wasting your time shilling this DoA