/g/ has 5 minutes to defend Google search results having

>>59041610
If they were all on one page it would take a really long time to load.

it werks

porn
boom done eat shit n die fag goat

>>59041610
Gogle sounds stupid.

>>59041610

well people only care about page 1 anyway and removing all other pages would turn google into a shitfest and SEO would become pretty much impossible and only a thing for big corporations

nowadays it is still possible to beat big corps by putting in a lot of effort for free (if time has zero value that is)

>>59041663
winner

OP confirmed never written a paper

Infinite scroll is cancer, along with fixed headers.

>>59041666
>tfw my site has to compete with cancerous sites from 2003 with thousands of spam links and pages from big corporations with barely any content

weird. if i search for "italian navy" and go past page 16 there are no results despite there being, allegedly, 2.2m results.

>>59041610
Pages 1-20 are 99% false positives (look for "window won't open because of cold temperature", only results you ever get are "windows freezes on boot" and these words are the ones google highlights in every result)

Checkmate.

>>59041784
Italians are known to sink after a while.

>>59041784
I think Google means there are 2.2 million pajeets copying the web.

It's a holdover back when pages weren't dynamically generated.

People don't search beyond page one more than 90% of the time, anyway.

>he hasn't set it to 100 results per page in the settings

>>59041663
Nice

>>59041610
I actually used upto page 10 when doing research work. Turns out only the first page has relevant results that actually relate to the keyword. Page 2 onward is completely useless stuff. Not sure why they include useless results.

>>59042208

he uses google services while logged into his account