>2017 >Not using Pale Moon Why? In 5 years, when all the

>>59035795
>2017
>Not using outdated firefox clone

>>59035795
>obscure mess of cut and paste code made by a furry

k

>>59035825
Have you even *used* firefox in recent years? This is a case where outdated = better.

I'm on Pale Moon to futureproof myself against the inevitable brewing shit storm that is Firefox 57

S E A M O N K E Y
E
A
M
O
N
K
E
Y

>>59035795

There is no good reason to use Palemoon when firefox exist.

Even if you don't like SJW Firecucks you can't denied that their Web Browser is the best between Security and Privacy.

Yes it's more slow but you can't have everything.
That why i use ESR.

>>59035837
That describes literally every open source project tho

Because I'm using Firefox 28.

>>59035871
I agree there isn't right now (Waterfox is better if you just want a speed based recompile or want to be special) but Firefox 57 is going to break shit like Classic Theme Restorer that make Firefox worth using over Chrome. If you want a web browser with no UI customization, using WebExtensions for addons, there's much better Chrome based browsers like Iridium. If you actually want to customize your UI or use any poweruser extensions, you'll need Pale Moon

>>59035871
>i use ESR.
Why ESR specifically?

>>59036031
>one year ago

>>59036031
>(me catching my breath)
People might actually be inclined to open your image or care about your point if you weren't obviously a disposable redditor

>>59036045
nothing changed, retard. it's still the worst fucking browsers in the world when it comes to security.

it took them TEN FUCKING YEARS to add a fucking sandbox after Chrome added one.

File: salivating wojak.jpg (97KB, 659x729px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 659x729px

But I do use Pale Moon, anon

File: minix3_mmosaic.png (96KB, 1081x723px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1081x723px

>>59035795
>2017
>Not using MMosaic on Minix3 with amiwm.

wtf.

File: 1456436343706.jpg (41KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 396x382px

>>59036031
Retard like you make me wanna kill myself.

>>59035795
>linux mint
>facebook
>twitter
>adblock

>pale moon thread
>discussion about mental illness
Seems about right.

>Year of satan 666+666+666+6+6+6+1
>Not using Seamonkey on Windows 2000
Dude why

>>59036409

what's wrong with these?

File: opera-logo-250x250.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>59035795
I won't leave the masterrace till I can't use it anymore.

>>59036604
>not openBSD
>cucker(((berg)))
>censorship
>not ublock

>>59035795
I use Pale Moon as my main browser and it's definitely not perfect. For a good half a year about 50% of websites just didn't work on it. We're talking about a port of a browser that's already down to sub-10% marketshare. Of course nobody really cares about it.

>>59035871
Firefox is a joke when it comes to security, and it's weird that /g/ doesn't seem to understand this.

pwn2own isn't even bothering with Firefox anymore because it's so easy.

https://it.slashdot.org/story/16/02/12/034206/pwn2own-2016-wont-attack-firefox-because-its-too-easy

>>59036729
This year they're adding it back in.

>>59036729
Browser security isn't that simple, though. There are two important parts: the initial exploit, and privilege escalation (aka, breaking out of the sandbox).

Firefox, for a while, has been good at the first but never the second. Chrome, for a while, was only good at the second but now is good at both. IE was terrible at both fixing vulns and sandboxing, but edge has improved massively in both regards (still is nonfree shit, just well-functioning nonfree shit).

>>59036409
>facebook
>twitter
Those are a part of that specific web page. I don't use them.

>>59036834

Maybe I'm just out of date. Is firefox well sandboxed these days?

>>59035795
i dont give a shit if the author is a furry who sucks dicks for a living, clonemoon still doesnt support my favourites firefox's extensions, beside that the browser feels light and comfy

Can you use 4chanx on palemoon?

File: 2017-02-20 22_09_31-Greenshot.png (108KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1280x1024px

>>59037011
Is this b8?

File: 1483512291407.png (200KB, 265x342px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 265x342px

>falling for the pale moon may may

Vivaldi master race

>>59037026
No, dumbass. It was a question.

>>59036988
Heh, nope, it still isn't. They want to move to a multi-process model (and are perpetually close to doing so), but there are tons of shitty extensions that will get broken with the change, so a large portion of the userbase pushes back.

>>59035795
Because it keeps crashing and because half of the addons have compatibility issues. Dob't get me wrong, I love this browser and used it for years on my potato computers. But i just can't take it anymore, it's just too buggy and can't keep up with the updates.

>>59037122
The extensions are the whole reason to use Firefox, without them it's just another piece of shit like every other modern browser.

>>59037084
You can do everything on Pale Moon.

I would add that Youtube playback is kinda choppy compared to Firefox (I have an E4300 though)

>>59037156
I actually agree. My main issue with FF has been that it has adapted *too many* chrome-like features while ditching what used to make it good and unique.

Still, they basically did a large-scale revamp of the extensions API in, like 2011 right? But they still haven't moved to a multiprocessing model.

>>59035795
add-ons

>>59035846
It's not even outdated. It get's new code from FF, just without the bloat, botnet and retardness.

>>59037028
>Using a JACK browser
>Just Another Chrome Knockoff

>>59037154
No crash since many many many versions ago here. Also all needed extensions which are needed work fine.

File: 1481107210547.png (85KB, 946x416px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 946x416px

Reminder that Firefox is an insecure PIECE OF SHIT and shouldn't be used for everyday browsing.

https://www.cvedetails.com/product/3264/Mozilla-Firefox.html?vendor_id=452

No amount of bitching and reporting will fix that fact, SJWcucks.

>>59037254
which

>>59037254
Care to elaborate?

waterfox still better?

>>59037315
>le Vivaldi is a Chrome reskin meme
When will this meme die?

Once Pale moon gives access to Tor I'll consider it. in the meantim, ill just stick to one clone per browser.

>>59038503
It's literally Chromium with a web app for the UI

>>59035795
Hi pajeet

>>59038221
>>59038036
Not him, but isn't HTTPS Everywhere still fucked?

>>59035871

There is no good reason to use Google Chrome when Chromium exist.
There is no good reason to use Vivaldi when Opera exist.
There is no good reason to use Opera when Palemoon exist.
There is no good reason to use Palemoon when SeaMonkey exist.
There is no good reason to use SeaMonkey when Firefox exist.

[...]

>>59038921
No. Change minVersion to 27.0 and it works fine.

See also https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/encrypted-web/

>>59039067
Encrypted Web broke a fuckload of websites for me.

I have the regular one installed with the testing tool, but I can't get the menu to show up or any other options. It seems(?) to be working, though.

>>59035866
abandoned

>>59035795
Can it sync my bookmarks and passwords so I can access to them by using a password? No? Then :^)

What about SeaMonkey?

File: 1464537504850.png (12KB, 246x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 246x200px

>>59036646

>>59039722
Uh, yes?

http://www.palemoon.org/sync/

>>59038548
This is actually completely untrue.

>Quick Commands/Vivaldi Launcher
>Browser Task Manager
>Expanded Settings Options
>Mouse Gesture controls
>More customizable UI beyond the web app (relocate the tab bar, remove UI elements such as Address Bar)
>Bookmark nicknames and instant access to nicknamed bookmarks upon nickname entry
>Renamable tab stacks
>Tab tiling
>Web panels
>Website notifications display on tab

Most of these features, I use on a daily basis. How many of them does Chromium have natively?

File: 1487507590497.jpg (58KB, 1125x642px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1125x642px

In the future firefox will be the most secure browser because the userbase will be so small that the day ones won't be worthwhile for the hackers.

>>59039841
Lmao

>>59035795
Because Chrome is better

>>59039832
I never said Chromium has any of those natively, those are part of the web app running on top of Chromium.

>>59035795
I am though