>implying Chrome will allow you to block YouTube ads after

Doesn't Chrome have like over half the market already?

If they do that we just switch to a different browser. Whats your problem?

File: 205.jpg (31KB, 600x406px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x406px

>>59015387
When it will be too late you'll only see "This site does not support your browser" message.

>>59015384
This. Google know you can't ship a desktop browser these days without adblocking. Chrome has slightly over 50% of the market and slightly over 10% of internet users use adblockers. If they decided to prevent it from Chrome's side (even on YouTube,) a lot of people would jump ship to Firefox or Chromium forks like Brave.

On the phone, Chrome doesn't have extensions of any kind. If they could get away with this on the desktop, they would.

>>59015407
this will never happen

File: 1469655987798.jpg (63KB, 480x388px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 480x388px

>>59015379
What Did He Mean by This.

>>59015407
*teleports behind you*

*unzips about:config*

*sets user agent as chrome*

pss... nothin personnel... botnet...

>>59015876
>implying they will check for user agent value instead of using some kind of cryptographic certificate

youtube-dl

>>59016125
This

>>59015379
Remember when chrome coudn't block http requests and all "adblockers" were actualy hiding ads after loading? It took extreme pressure for jewgle to implement better api. Guess what will happen when chrome hits 90% market share.

>>59015539
Such a naive goy.

Jokes on you, youtube is actually the only website where i disable ublock