Whats the point of adblock if sites dont let you view content

>>58996050
>going to jewish sites

Stop using shit sites.

>>58996050
Use Reek anti-adblock blocker

>that fucking theme

jesus

File: 2017-02-17 21-28-29.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>58996050
my eyes are bleeding

>>58996501
Kill yourself, you dumb fucking shit stain.

>>58996535
lol you're so mad. did you pick that theme out all by yourself?

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1680x1020px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1020px

>>58996050
holy fuck your browser is ugly

Anyways, ublock origin blocks the adblock blocker like a champ. Try updating your block lists.

What the fuck am I looking at?
Is this bait?

File: Screenshot_2017-02-18_16-12-11.png (382KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1366x768px

>>58996757
He isnt the op as i am.

>>58997081
fuck mate pull your head in

>>58997273
No you pull in yours faggot.

>>58996050
Use glimmerblocker or block ad servers from your router.

>>58996065
sometime this shit doesn't work

>>58996050
>inspect element
>delete shit

>>58996050
>>58997867

Yeah you can set up some pretty nice adblocking with DDRT.


I use the firewall script: http://dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Ad_blocking


Love it, every device in the house is a smooth ride.

File: snapshot_00.19_[2015.07.28_02.15.04].png (1MB, 1152x648px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1152x648px

>>58996065
i'm browsing on that site, it works!

>>58996050
Only the biggest jew sites use adblock detector. Don't use those sites. That simple.

>>58996130


LATimes uses it:

http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-brad-grey-paramount-exit-20170217-story.html

Also CBS:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-60-minutes-interview-with-grace-murray-hopper/

>>58996050

This tells you a lot about the news organization you're interacting with. If they have an anti ad block filter it means they don't care about bringing news to the public in order to help them.

All they care about is making a shekel. If there's no way they can get a shekel from you they will literally block you from viewing their content because you're useless to them.

It's a "Stop using my site" message.

Just stop using the site if they block adblock.
Fuck them.

>>58996050

What's the point of a site that blocks you for using an adblocker?

I mean, OP, at least ask the question correctly.

Answer: boycott any site that engages in that activity. I do. Don't miss anything.

I have a 100% custom filter, about 300 filters for about 200 unique domains. Any ad that pops up or under, any ad that autoplays a sound or video file, any ad that uses an epilepsy-inducing GIF ... all of them get their domain blocked at the root.

Such as: http://*.advertising. com/ (an actual real site in my filter).

Everything from images to content to frames to scripts are nuked because that site kept auto-playing videos with sound while I was surfing the internet trying to listen to music. Their autoplaying sound came screaming through my speakers and raped my ears about twice ... took about one minute to locate the originating domain and haven't seen (or heard!) a single pixel of their content in over four years now (over 120,000 blocked hits so far).

I mean .. Jesus fucking Christ. Try to comprehend an advertising server that hits your browser 30,000 times a year during casual browsing of websites. And, that's just one of the machines I use. Of fucking course that domain is permablackholed.

Have two *.doubleclick.net filters that have 105,000 hits on one and 143,000 hits on the other.

Feels Pretty Fucking Good.

File: 1472886751070.jpg (21KB, 300x245px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x245px

>>58998361
pastebun list this is brilliant

If you want to use adblockers, websites have all the right in the world to deny serving you their content. Stop being a whiny bitch.

File: 1487300828780.jpg (43KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 604x604px

>>58998361
>Answer: boycott any site that engages in that activity. I do.
I think is better just make bash script to download some pictures from this site in an infinite loop. And use this for 4-8 hours daily.

>>58998427
Bandwidth is cheap for business. You can get 1 TB for way less than $5. While at Comcast you get 1 TB a month for what, >$50?

>>58996050
i wonder how much electricity world wastes (ok. uses) just to view ads

>>58998441
In Yurop internet don't have limited bandwidth.

File: whatantiadblock.png (877KB, 1488x1056px) Image search: [Google]

877KB, 1488x1056px

>>58996050

>noscript
>block latimes.com and cbsnews.com
ez
no more ads and you can read the text no problem

>>58997930
Did you remember to install GreaseMonkey/TamperMonkey and the userscript as well? Because it needs the userscript to work properly.

It's frequently updated. It works very, very often.

If it doesn't work on a site, just close the tab.

>>58996050
uBlock Origin doesn't have this problem

>>58998100
I have no problems on CBS but on LATimes they introduce some css that hides overflow that you need to make a userstyle to override as well as adding the overlay to your custom filters.

>>58996050
Another solution is to put the site you want to read in an archive.

https://archive.fo/

My ad blocker + script blocker works most of the time. I feel like 4 or 5 times out of a year I hit a site where I need to dig into "devtools". And if a simple delete-element doesn't do the trick, then I turn to the archive.

>>58997081
>current state of Linux

>search for something on google
>a "disable adblock pls" popup shows without letting to read the content
>close tab, remember to never visit the site again
>proceed to try the next result

>>58996050
Use uBlock Origin.
It has yet to fail me,thing just steamrolls over ads.

>>58998126
Oh hell, I didn't think of this. Not that I go to Jewish news sites anyway. Good point though.

File: Untitled.png (9KB, 256x364px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x364px

>use this to block the blocker
>problem solved
also, only shit sites with shit content blocks ublock users. just move along. there will always be something similar and/or better available

>>58996050
how the actual fuck do you manage to make your browser even come close to looking like such trash

>>59000420
this, good to see at least one person knows how to ublock efficiently

>>58997867
does Glimmerblocker work well now? I haven't tried it in several years.

Adnauseam.io
Extension clicks on all ads in a sandbox to waste advertiser's money

>>59000653
>willingly submitting to the botnet, so far as to let it actually cuck you
wew

>>59000684
Actually clicking on the ads like adnauseam costs the advertizers money with no benefit. It"s the equivalent of taking your local car dealerships offer of free test drives up until they go bankrupt because they can't pay for gas any more.

>>58996050
Stop visiting shit sites or use µBlock origin and it's anti-antiadblock. Even Google's sites let you use adblock and Google is primarily an advertising company.

>>59000790
They're still getting all the benefits of tracking you and selling your metadata lol

>>58996050
>2017
>don't use Temple OS.
CIA nigger.

>>59000797
No you aren't lol :P It's a pure AJAX request happening in a sandbox ^^ But I'm sure you did *know* that, didn't you? xD

>>59000815
>implying they can't track you by your IP

>>59000684
>>59000797
>>59000827
wow are you the real jordan? upvoted

>>59000827
I am sure you have irrefutable proof for this claim. Present it please. Because Adnauseam acts like a proxy between you and the ads, much like any other "blocker" like ublock, adblock etc does.

File: Screenshot (24).png (284KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 2560x1440px

>>59000848
Literally in the paper they link on their homepage about TMN which they seem to be based on. Nowhere did I see it mentioned that it acts as a proxy.

So I mean if you want to get rekt any more, just let me know. I'll be here waiting on (you)s

>>59000884
It's actually forked from ublock Origin now. Continue embarrassing yourself, please. I haven't loled at a cuck like u in days :3

>>59000894
Still had to reenable that extension and manually update in google chrome.

I'm so happy adnauseam is being shilled whenever anyone mentions ads or tracking, soon we'll reach critical mass

And if you think "tracking by ip" is a thing, get a fucking VPN you stupid nigger

>>59000894
>>59000884
Also, to help your obvious lack of reading comprehension: TMN stands for TrackMeNot, which is a Google seach obfuscator. It sends out crap google searches in an attempt to hide your actual search terms in a sea of junk.

It literally has nothing to do with AdNauseam, other than being by the same developers and copying the principle of crapflooding;

Feels good to know things, does it not, Jordan?

>>59000894
So where's it mentioned that it acts as a proxy?

https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ

PROTIP: you won't find where because it sends the requests from your own machine

>>58996061
This.
Just remember which ones doesn't work with adblock and stop giving them pageviews from accidental clicks
it's mostly only news websites which block adblocker and news websites are not even professional journalists anymore they just write yellow journalism and propaganda for the most part why would you pay for that bullshit fake news?

>>59000933
Yes, it registers a click, then discards all data it gets in return. It doesn't matter, because all tracking is based on cookies and javascript, both of which are ignored by adnauseam. Try again, google shill.

>>59000917
>using a browser made by an adware company

>>59000933
Because that is the fundamental principle of an adblocker. It doesn't need explaining, dear friend.

Your browser <-> Adblocker <-> Web

That/ s how it works.

>>59000945
>>59000946
>be ad company
>place ads on 2 websights
>ad clicked on by $IP on each sight
>that's monetizable data - that a user visits both sights

you guys are such morans I cannot even understand why you don't get this

>>59000955
>it also turns out that the same ip visits every single website
>it's also true for thousands of other IPs

Poisoned data set is worse than no data set at all, anon, that's the point of the plugin. To waste money and introduce noise.

>>58996050
I have Firefox with GreaseMonkey and Reek's Anti-Adblock Killer installed. If I enter forbes.com I can navigate without problem. But if I google something and then, by a google link, I enter forbes.com, I may have problems rolling the site.

>>59000964
But you're still volunteering to be in the botnet and there's no proxy functionality.
See >>59000848 (he's a retard)

>>59000884
>shitting on people who "give into the botnet"
>uses wincucks 10 and chrome
You can't be serious.

question: I have Ublock but I don't want it fucking warning me every time I click on links from google shopping. That shit is really, really annoying. What do I turn off so that it only blocks advertisements on websites and known malware sites?

>>58997970
THIS, it's so fucking satisfying despite being among the pettiest of victories.

File: when soros gets out of hand and brings his jihad to israel.jpg (74KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x400px

>>58996050
that kike site won't even let you read if you don't allow cookies

>>58996050
If you don't immediately leave websites and never return when you see that shit you're a retard and part of the problem.

File: 1482699008851.jpg (32KB, 443x442px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 443x442px

>>58997081
I like your style.

>>58998427

Someone should use their massive botnets to do this. Deplete websites' bandwidth by running scripts that download images from their servers 24/7

File: 2017-02-18 09-37-45.webm (3MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x576px

>>58998100

>>58996050
i just back out of those websites. all internet content is disposable. you don't really care that much about the article to go through the trouble of reading it. they aren't providing as much of a service to you as they want you to believe.

unless said website is offering me a download and is holding it ransom behind an adblock detector i wouldn't think twice about closing the tab and moving on with my time.

File: app.png (30KB, 296x411px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 296x411px

>>58996050
>>59002557
also capital FUCK forbes specifically along with every other website that does this, especially on mobile.

>>59002164

the CBS news video didn't load

File: 2017-02-18 09_31_25-Brad Grey expected to exit Paramount Pictures in an overhaul of the struggling s.png (668KB, 1458x946px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 1458x946px

>>58998100
Stop using inferior blockers

File: Selection_001.png (70KB, 1609x305px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1609x305px

>>59002616
likewise

>>59002602
Is it flash?

>>58996050
Is Ad Nauseam detectable by the anti-adblockers?

Since Ad Nauseam actually loads the ad, I imagine that it would be immune to anti-adblocking sites. Or am I wrong about that?

Get the anti-adblock list for unlocking code k origin

>>58996050
Install the YesScript addon, and blacklist javascript on any website that does that.

>>59000596
Yes, I've been using it for a while, but the lists are outdated and you'll have to update them.

>>59003040
It could be immune to anti-adblockers. But not due to the reasons you think.

Anti ad-blocking is really simple. Most Adblockers use filters like EasyList. EasyList will block stuff like scripts called "advertising.js". So what happens? Sites are broken and unusable by default. But that script "advertising.js" unfucks the site and makes it usable again.
So Adblock-users will block that script that would make the site usable again.

>>58996050
Works with ublock.
>>58998100
Likewise.
Are you too dumb to block ads, OP? Just a couple of ticks to add more subscriptions.

>>58996050
Those sites are not worth viewing anyways

>>59001226
Right? Dunno why people don't think to do it

Anyone able to get through allmusic.com without the site being disabled?

>>58999607
This. As long as I don't need to interact with the website, I use archives

File: bartvsaustralia5_thumb.png (136KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 512x384px

>use an adblocker
>"Thanks for not using adblocker!"

Just get uBlock and activate all the Anti-Adblocker lists.

>>58996050

Block the ad-block detected ad you dunce.

Sites can't tell when you're using ad-block they just post an image that you can only see if you block their shit.

>>58997970
This.

>>58997081
your ui got hit by the ugly bus

>>58997930
try FuckFuckAdblock by Mechazawa

>>58996050
How do you get up in the morning?

File: 2017-02-18 18h 19m 55s.png (161KB, 1400x930px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1400x930px

>>58996050
no problem here

>>59007582
Doesn't this require greasemonkey to use? Firefox is slow enough as it is.

>>59007771
greasemonkey doesn't make anything slower in my experience. Probably because I'm running Waterfox

>>59007771
Yes, so does reeks anti-adblocker
I use reeks and adsbypasser
My browser is fast enough for me >>58996130 >>59002164

>>59007771
It doesnt make it slower. Some stupid scripts might.
setting layers.acceleration.force-enable to true helps performance. theres also a bunch of other tweaks you can do in about:config

>>58996050
nice theme