What shells does /g/ use? Fish myself. I like its colurs, completion

>>58976648
Bash. I don't care, too busy to circlejerk about shell. Grow the fuck up and stop shilling your hipster shell.

Bash because it just werks

File: Screenshot from 2017-02-16 22-04-52.png (169KB, 1282x578px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1282x578px

Rate my custom fish prompt

ksh because I'm forced to

>>58976665
The fuck is the point if you aren't running default. Bash is cool. I can barely write scripts in Bash though.

I've just finished converting my exports and functions to fish syntax. fish is a very good interactive shell.

I use dash for all shell scripts. bash is shit and slow.

>>58976908
I like the colors but at the same time it's almost too busy / cluttered.

>>58977209
Hm, yeah, I should reduce the saturation and choose some decent colors that work well together with each other... Thanks for the input

Bash, because it is the de facto standard.

>>58976648
Bash most of the time or (m)ksh if I want to mix things up.

>>58976648
mksh, because it works nicely and isn't as slow as fish

File: image.jpg (4KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 300x57px

>>58976665
>>58976667
off by 1.

>>58976648
Look at me. I can count all the bash commands I know and still have fingers left over, but I'm too cool for the shell my distro's devs chose to make default.

>>58976666

>>58976648
I wish the emerge package version completions weren't broken though

>>58976648
Tried fish once. Typed "help". It opened some shit on the webbrowser. Uninstalled.

File: 1421168477521.jpg (44KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 400x300px

>>58976908

File: Screenshot_2017-02-17_12-50-09.png (966KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

966KB, 1280x800px

>>58976648
I use bash because it's the default in my distro and I can't be fucked installing another
>>58976908
Colours are okay, looks awful though

mksh, it's bloatless. rc doesn't have autocompletion

Also you should stop using fish and zsh, these are even more bloated than bash

Bash for my interactive shell. Zsh for scripts because it's faster. "Why not just use a proper (scripting) language if you need performance?" Because shell scripting is all I know.

I'm senior Linux systems engineer, I'm just stating that since I live in terminals. I just use bash. I'd probably learn some zsh magic but I ssh into so many systems that I'd really only be using zsh on my local workstation.

rc

>>58980879
Hope you don't work at a HIT company

Honest question, why bother with anything other than bash?

bash has tab-completion and reverse isearch, and that's all i need

openbsd-pdksh on OpenBSD, mksh on Linux and OS X

>>58976908
$

rate my PS1

Zsh. It's configured to function almost identically to an out the box fish setup. I would like to use Fish, but you can't really set it to be a default shell for any user, and scripting in it is not portable anywhere.

>>58977050
Bash scripting isn't that difficult, all it really is is gluing programs and variables together.

>>58976648
dash / whatever /bin/sh is linked to for scripting, bash for interactive. I don't see a point in switching shells.

>>58982969
Because bash's completion is unintuitive

>>58976648
I fell for the fish meme

It's bretty nice

zsh with syntax coloring and autosuggestion plugins