Duckduckgo vs ixquick vs startpage I'm looking to feed

Qwant ?

startpage is the only real choice.
>comfy themes
>accurate searches
>doesn't perform analytics like ddg does
>fast

>>58965760
Doesn't it go through Google, though?

>>58965771
>tldr
https://www.startpage.com/proxy/eng/help.html
>long
https://www.startpage.com/eng/protect-privacy-qa.html?#q14

>>58965719
Duckduckgo's !Bangs are literally the best thing that has ever happened to search engines

>>58965950
OP here. I love them to and DDG is my primary search engine atm, but I've been hearing privacy concerns about it.

Maybe they're related to their recent partnership with Yahoo?

>>58965719
You'll get nothing but unsubstantiated allegations and conspiracy theories.

>>58966604
So, is there really nothing wrong with DuckDuckGo from an anonymity point of view?

>>58967041
youll see people talk about the creators past and how its connected to yahoo and bing. Its really hard to make a desicion on this search engine with all these dif talking points

>>58965719
>I'm looking to feed the botnet as little as possible

Leaving this mongol basket weaver botnet would be great first step.

File: dont_trust_hiro.png (2MB, 1402x3892px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1402x3892px

>>58965719
>>58966007
>>58967041

Sorry OP, DDG is the jewnet just like google.

There's an image explaining it floating around here somewhere

ixquick, startpage, or searx.me is the way to go if you really care about privacy.

Picrelated is the same format as the duckduckgo one, ill look for it

>>58967279
That would be appreciated if you posted it.

File: 1425371493109.jpg (312KB, 935x1277px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 935x1277px

>>58967347
You are welcome! :^)

opengo.nl

File: Screenshot_20170216-011827.png (73KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1440x2560px

DDG doesn't have any trackers, I think people just got freaked out

>>58965719
https://searx.me

>>58967615
No ddg doesn't respect privacy.

File: 1456109161895.gif (156KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 250x250px

STOP TRUSTING CORPORATIONS NOT TO ARCHIVE AND SELL YOUR DATA JUST BECAUSE THEY PROMISED
>STOP TRUSTING CORPORATIONS NOT TO ARCHIVE AND SELL YOUR DATA JUST BECAUSE THEY PROMISED
STOP TRUSTING CORPORATIONS NOT TO ARCHIVE AND SELL YOUR DATA JUST BECAUSE THEY PROMISED
>STOP TRUSTING CORPORATIONS NOT TO ARCHIVE AND SELL YOUR DATA JUST BECAUSE THEY PROMISED
STOP TRUSTING CORPORATIONS NOT TO ARCHIVE AND SELL YOUR DATA JUST BECAUSE THEY PROMISED

>>58967941
So... which search engine should I use?

>>58967279
>>58967938

Nobody has given me a real reason why not to trust DuckDuckGo.

>>58967971
Nothing hosted by an american corporation. Beyond that it can not possibly make a difference no matter what they tell you. They are all equally required by law to track and hand over your data to the government and as soon as they do they are required by law to say they don't.

>>58967990
Well firstly, your searches aren't actually handled by a duck.
That's lie number 1.

If they can't even be honest that your searches are being handled by big racks of servers then you should just give up there.

>>58967990
>>58967998

>>58967998
ixquick/startpage are partly based in New York.

What about searx and opengo.nl?

Find that sometimes startpage doesn't use Google results sometimes... very annoying

>>58967990
Nobody has given a real reason to trust either. It's like a religion.

>>58968454
One question is important:
How is duck duck go making money?

File: Screenshot_2017-02-16-22-40-50.jpg (354KB, 1440x832px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1440x832px

>>58967990
How can pic related not be enough of a reason?

File: images(27).jpg (21KB, 482x636px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 482x636px

>>58970100
To add on to these opesky Jews

Before he built a reputation in the hacker community for being the solo-founder behind the unfunded search engine Duck Duck Go, Gabriel (((Weinberg))) bootstrapped NamesDatabase, an online directory which he sold for $10 million.

The Names Database is a partially defunct social network, owned and operated by Classmates.com, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Online.

An area of criticism has been the expanded license granted to the site for information entered to it upon registration.[14] However, this license is substantially similar or identical to that granted to other social networking services.[15] Additionally, the site appears to try to collect only the minimal amount of information needed to find an old friend and classmate (name, birth year, email address and high school country with optional
name) as opposed to more invasive required information like gender, zip code and birth date as found on other sites.[2]

You just can't trust (((them))) my friend

searx.me

>>58970516
What a horrid mess of contrived and confused reasoning. Whoever made that really isn't as clever as they think they are.