So, where did Linux Desktop operating systems go wrong? Why are they so bloated now and why is BSD so much more stable and quicker and more efficient than any Linux distro?
Face it guys, next year is the year of the BSD desktop Have fun with your big fat burger eating Linux distro
The BSD desktop came when Lumina was released, dummy.
>>58941599
>Linux Desktop operating systems
no such thing
I think when people are on desktops it's because they are doing it to sit down relax play games and such since Linux isnt necessarily a sit down and chill OS at first so people don't bother with it.
>>58943834
this is pretty much it
you know the reason why Windows used to BSOD all the time? It's because Windows had the graphics subsystem in the kernel. When you have the graphics subsystem in the kernel, if the graphics drivers crash, it corrupts the kernel.
So why did Windows put the graphics subsystem on the kernel? Simple... They were worried it would be slow, and discourage people from making games for Windows otherwise.
The reason why Windows was so popular is because it was designed to have utilities AND, more importantly, GAMES.
Linux wasn't designed with games in mind, it was designed with 'making a good OS' in mind.
>>58941599
This is the most loaded question anyone has ever asked. It is obvious that there is a huge bias from the one asking the question.
Utter garbage.