Will the AMD Ryzen actually be a good match for the GTX 1070/1080?

>>58876696
Listen here you tasmanian cock mongler. No one gives a fuck about your trash decisions for technology here. Go choke on a dick and get polio you cuck

>>58876742
anon, that's rude

File: 1456662467411.png (66KB, 382x395px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 382x395px

>>58876742

Poets will still be amazed by your immense idiocy for many years after an angry mob kills you.

File: images.jpg (3KB, 145x116px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 145x116px

>>58876696
Ew.....AMD.....

File: 1010673_601696543256737_626087940_n.jpg (13KB, 450x675px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 450x675px

>>58876742

>>58876696

Need independent benchmarks to properly evaluate your question, op.

>>58876696
Its almost here, just wait the 3 weeks. See benchmarks and shit and then decide.

File: 1484749249556.gif (2MB, 402x323px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 402x323px

>>58876696
Historically Nvidia GPU's do better on AMD processors than AMD GPU's do. Their driver is more multithreaded so many weak cores weren't as much an issue.

AMD never took steps to break Nvidia cards on their platform.

>Ryzen vs GTX 10 series
>Comparing a CPU to a GPU

File: haredi-intel.jpg (35KB, 636x390px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 636x390px

>>58876779

Good Goy!

>>58877074
>reading comprehension

>>58876696
Nobody knows yet.

based on the IPC claims it should be an excellent match. We will have to wait and see if AMD's claims are true. I bet they are.

>>58877435
>>>58877074
>>reading comprehension

"Match" can also mean competition, not pairing.

Absofuckinlutely.

>>58878540
it's obvious what op meant