Things Firefox can do that Chrome can't: -have an rss reader

>>58847682
>remember websites you visit
>be installed offline
chrome can do both of those
try again

File: e3e3.png (36KB, 677x430px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 677x430px

-play flacs and apng files natively

>>58847693

No it fucking does not.

Pic related happens so many fucking times. The browser is literally telling me I have already visited the page, but for some reason it doesn't appear in the url bar.

>>58847719
Type the url once :^)

>>58847682
>have an rss reader
Try chromopera, it has integrated comfortable rss reader.
>not have webrtc leaks
Can be disabled already.
>take full website screenshots
That's not what everyone uses everyday, at least you always have Alt+PrtScr for active window (what I like in Firefox is you can actually take a snapshot of *node* of DOM on page, kinda like part of page, just try it, that is one thing Chromium hasn't introduced yet)
>remember websites you visit
Wut? Did you just say Chrome doesn't have history? Well, it has.
>be installed offline
Actually can.

>>58847719
>-play flacs and apng files natively
Who the hell places FLACs for online playing? It weights 10+ times more than mp3, which is, with variable bitrate and joint stereo, almost indistinguishable from flac with your shitty headphones.
>apng
Which is developed by Mozilla, yeah. With copyright. Like .gif sometime, just the same error they made.

File: 1473023569600.jpg (62KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 604x453px

>>58847682
>-take full website screenshots
How?

>>58848080
>shift+f2
>screenshot --fullpage

File: Untitled.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>58847682
>anymore?

Look awesome!

Chrome doesn't send you emails saying that Trump is the next Hitler though.

Holy molly! Thanks anon.

>>58848257
are we just making shit up now?

>>58848257
it should

>>58847682
Tree. Style. Tabs.

>>58847682
-unretarded selection
-work offline

>>58848121
WTF I LOVE FIREFOX NOW!

File: image.jpg (86KB, 1220x712px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1220x712px

>>58848257
No, but google does have it's own sjw flavor when you use it every so often.

>>58847682
Not be botnet. Be FOSS.

>>58848257
Because it's so obvious that they don't need to?

>>58847682
>features that no one uses

>>58848257
where would FF send emails to me I don't even have an account with them?

>>58849723
kek