SHIT HITS THE FAN: Linux security woes confirmed - Windows mitigated

>>58842953
>Linux security woes confirmed
sounds about right
>Windows mitigated long time ago
be a little less obvious next time, good luck!

>>58842953
>Linux's out in the open security problems have been exposed by independent auditors
Yes, while Windows rampant security problems won't even be let known to its users, much less "auditors" of any sort due to its closed-source nature.

File: the_bogs.jpg (28KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x360px

>>58842953
firejail.
also smartTV's are notoriously buggy.

Youre killing strawmen here

>>58843001

This is what I was talking about in the OP.

What part of humble pie didn't you understand?

>>58843003

Auditors don't look at the source code to find openings. I worked 5 years for Cigital doing that shit.

File: 1477050149534.png (1MB, 1078x683px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1078x683px

How are lincucks ever gonna be able to recover?

>>58842953
>Linux security woes confirmed
[by whom?]
- Windows mitigated long time ago
[citation needed]

>linux has problem
gets fixed
>windows has problem
it's a roll the dice

stop attempting to spread fud, modern web browsers are (mostly) secure, even a linux user that doesn't know what they're doing shouldn't have any issues as long as their system is up to date. A more sophisticated user would be properly isolating things like web browsers from the rest of their computing environment.

>>58843066
>A more sophisticated user
Now that's just moving the goalposts. A sophisticated user is able to lock down any operating system, including Windows.

Security is a process. Not a product.

Fuck off OP. Every single year fucking shills brag about exploits discovered in Linux and every single time it turns out the exploit can only be triggered by doing some shaman bullcrap in a command nobody uses, not to mention they usually get fixed very quickly once their threat potential is discovered.

I sometimes use Win7 and some bugs I've seen since 2011 are still not fixed.

>>58843094

What part of "can be exploited by a web page" didn't you understand?

>>58843033
That isn't entirely true, MS has contractors do source code review. Alex Ionescu has been contracted multiple times

DELTE TIHS THERAD

>>58843123
Who has Linux contracted?

>linuxes newest anti exploitation feature: ASLR 10 years after everyone else
>Windows: Bleeding edge features https://mobile.twitter.com/aionescu/status/827663010659315712

>>58843116
And windohs can be infected by viewing an image.

>>58843197
>mobile
Dumb phoneposter.

Meanwhile grsecurity had this problem fixed for atleast 10years.

>>58843147
Nobody lmao, the NSA contracts VR for it though but they don't get fixed

File: he upgraded to windows10.gif (2MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x480px

>>58842953
>the superiority of Windows' security features
>troll harder, Pajeet.

>>58843404

This is what I was talking about in the OP.

PROTIP: you're in no position to mock us with memes when you have egg on face due to your system being so fragile a fucking multimedia framework vulnerability compromises the entire thing.

>>58843445
It's been fixed.

>ctrl f
>poo in loo
>no results
let me fix that
POO
O
O

IN
N

LOO
O
O
XDDDDDDDD

>>58843445
Deluding yourself that shitdows is anywhere near as secure as any other operating system.
Give your fricking head a shake.

>>58843526
You guys figure out control flow guard yet? LMAO owned idiot enjoy your ROP

>>58843116
What Linux bugs can be exploited by any webpage? dirtyc0w requires CLI access.

>>58842953
POO IN LOO PAJEET LINUX IS THE MOST SECURE OS EVER MADE! 1!1!!!1

>>58843029
Can someone give me a quick rundown on these guys?

File: scale privileges on windows.jpg (863KB, 2010x3167px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 2010x3167px

>>58842953
/thread

>Windows security in a nutshell
>connect to one of those open wifi networks from a printer
>literally gain control of anything connected to that printer
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-087.aspx

>>58842953
>But Linux users simply didn't care. They considered themselves unbreakable.
Weak bait and weak strawman. A tip: if you want to actually bait properly provide an argument based on facts and not on putting words on other people's mouth. Otherwise your argument gets quickly countered by any proof of vulnerabilities on other operative systems.

A simple question: If there exists a method to create perfect code what would be the point of opening the source to allow "study, change and improve the software"?

File: tmp_21629-1468924196365-1569690104.png (42KB, 853x543px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 853x543px

>>58843086
>Now that's just moving the goalposts.
>Security is a process. Not a product.

That's cute, but at least you are right.

>>58843116
Still wait for that webpage.

>>58843445
>mock us

This how you shill? :^)

>>58846313
And some faggot thought windows is better kiosk because easier to hide the cli. saved