When did Microsoft start producing more shitty vulnerable software

When people stopped using Adobe and nobody gives enough if a shit to find vulnerabilities for it anymore.

>>58842453
That's the total number per vendor, not per product.

Microsoft has way more products than Adobe. A vulnerability that affects Windows NT would be counted like 8 times in that list, and a vulnerability that affects Office would add 10 more. Meanwhile for Adobe, a bug for Flash or Acrobat counts as 1 bug, not one for every single version that each has.

If you slash the vulnerability numbers by products, Microsoft actually comes out pretty low.

File: Screenshot from 2017-02-08 09-55-59.png (22KB, 561x314px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 561x314px

>>58842524
You actually have a fair point.

However

>>58842641
Vulnerabilities per product Adobe still is worse
These graphs are hardly reliable, Microsoft is and has been making much more software products, sold to much more people, over much more time

>>58842641
I meant oracle
But Cisco damn

>>58842675
>>58842688
Just ignore me I don't know how to read
But that doesn't mean Linux isn't btfo

File: image.jpg (108KB, 404x462px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 404x462px

>>58842641
>Linux: Average of 111 vulnerabilities per product
b-b-but da botnet

>>58842804
This is why I use FreeBSD