>Windows Server 2012 R2 >Can't have uptime higher

>>58800423
Just don't update :^)

>>58800423
Updates aren't manditory on windows server.

>>58800437
>implying not installing updates will provide a fully updated system

>>58800453
>Implying if you're a professional you have just 1 production server.

Nigga you always have to 2 servers 1 that is in production and another as a backup.

And when the updates comes you migrate/clone the storage on the production server and run it on the the backup and replace it with 0 downtime while updating the production machine.

>>58800423
>Wankblowz
>Server
Toppest of the keks

>>58800423

RTFM

https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/wsus/2013/10/08/enabling-a-more-predictable-windows-update-experience-for-windows-8-and-windows-server-2012-kb-2885694/

>>58800754
You mean the most used server OS out there?

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2469469/network-software/windows-widens-lead-over-linux-in-the-server-market.html

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2467824/windows-pcs/idc--windows-dominates-linux-in-servers--not-just-the-desktop.html

>>58802299
DELTE

>>58802299

MODS

>>58800423
use windows server 2008 r2

>>58802299
Not that one. The one in 2017 reality.

File: 1486135414492.jpg (91KB, 863x709px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 863x709px

>>58800423
upgrade time

>>58800423

If upgrades matter to your system and network, you should have a live replication of your server anyway. Preferably on separate hardware to prevent downed systems due to hardware failure.

>>58802299
come on man those articles are 7 years old