>Radeon HD 5770 finally kicks the bucket >order an R7 250

>>58775168
>R7 250
That's why.
Should've gotten an EVGA nVidia GeForce GTX 1080 FTW with 8GB of VRAM, GSYNC capabilities, and support for nVidia GameWorks features such as nVidia's patented HairWorks and PhysX technology.

Are you positive it's actually utilising the gpu to render you fucking clod

>>58775187
>spending a thousand dollars for marginally better performance than the $170 RX 480
It's 2012, I very seriously hope you guys don't do this.

File: 1486017823947.png (130KB, 454x540px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 454x540px

>>58775200
>marginally

Who is this boner bhabhi?

File: render.png (32KB, 752x495px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 752x495px

>>58775196
Fairly sure, I don't know what else would cause my GPU to sit at 15 degrees above idle.

File: gtx_1080__amp__1070_vs_rx_480_-_performance_comparison.jpg (99KB, 1600x905px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1600x905px

>>58775207

>>58775207
>588% of the price
>~140% of the performance
yeah. marginally.

>>58775223
Can you pull up a gpu utilisation graph because that temperature increase could just be the ambient temperature rising because the cpu is under full load

>>58775168
wtf I love India now

>>58775223

take that piece of shit back and get a real gpu from either brand.

fuck just get another 5770 if you can from ebay. they're 40 bucks. that being said they're not worth 40 bucks, but used gpu prices are retarded as of the last couple years for various reasons.

>>58775231
What ridiculous prices do you have in your shit tier country

>>58775237

yeah op load up GPU-Z post pics.

>>58775225
>multicard setup when 99% of applications don't benefit, sometimes even performing worse, with it
>AMD

File: hmm.png (36KB, 637x790px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 637x790px

>>58775237
Well then. It'll sit at ~70% utilization for a few seconds, then dip to 0, the sit at 25% for a few seconds, then jump to 70% and repeat.

Boy oh boy, guess I'll have to see why the fuck it's only *sometimes* using the GPU to render shit.

>>58775168

wtf i love poo in loos now

>>58775256
What do you consider a "real" GPU?

Thoughts on this budget build? Think I can go cheaper for the same performance?
https://nz.pcpartpicker.com/list/sV78XH

>>58775285

a gpu that was considered mid-high end or better within the last 5 years.

the r7 series was never made to have any significant computing power, they're just a way to sell chips instead of scrapping them.

Same here got a t9 390 to replace hd5770, rendering on adobe premier got fucked up. Think the software didnt support it well

File: are you fucking kidding me.png (27KB, 731x412px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 731x412px

Are you fucking kidding me

>the last GPUs to support rendering were the 5xxx and 6xxx series

How the fuck do studios and youtubers render shit then? This is just a 4 minute video and it took almost 35 minutes to render. There's no way a studio exec is going to sit there with a thumb up his ass for 5 fucking hours to render 40 minutes of video.

>>58775168
>replace hd7750 with rx460
>barely any faster in the games I play
>Sven Coop still a stuttering mess in big maps
literally how

>>58775297
not bad
change the psu to something better
I personally use FSP raider 550W and I can recommend it or you can choose another one just make sure it's good
don't cheap out on it
bigger Watt does not mean better psu
look for amper in 12V rail to be more than 40A and can do overall minimum 500W
also switch that 980 to an 1070 if you can, the 980 is 1060 level
the 1070 is on Titan X (maxwell) level

>>58775225
The only game where this would probably happen tbqf

>>58775168

your HDMI is probably plugged into the motherboard

>>58775408
Thanks mate.

>>58775239
You white trash are ignorant.

>>58775272
It's not using the GPU at all, it's using your CPU.

Why do tards post threads like this without even checking the most basics of basics?

>>58775366
You probably bought a FX series CPU like a retard

CPU bottlenecks are a thing, especially in ancient engines that are single threaded

>>58775431
For now. DX12 is gonna fast become standard

>>58775432
>current year
>HDMISIS

>>58775348
Rendering using the GPU produces lower quality encodes, nobody professional uses it, they buy an i7.

>>58775499

i've heard this twice in the past two days on here.

care to explain why?

>>58775220
Tamannaah Bhatia

>>58775539
i would love an explanation as well

>>58775539
>>58775589
pro tip: he's talking out of his ass, just like all the retards that say anything less than a gtx 1080 is a waste of money

Think about it. How the fuck would rendering with a GPU produce lower quality encoding? If you use the calculator on your phone does it do worse math than a TI-84?

>>58775348
They use i7 6900k or 5830X. You know they are not poor as you are. 1080GTX also helps.

>>58775695
>using a card with no support whatsoever for video rendering
They have fancy processors but they absolutely do not use Nvidia cards, at all. Nvidia's render support was atrocious for a long time and then completely ended with the GTX 580.

>>58775263
Even in America a GTX 1080 is garbage. Wait for Vega or the GTX 1080 ti. Nvidia offers top of the line, but they fanboys in Nvidia are absolutely trash tier meme garbage. I just want top tier performance for good prices. Fuck Intel and Nvidia those goddam shills and AMD if they ever become like ShillIntel and Njunk.

>>58775168
https://youtu.be/qPc4Gsqi8tU

this video explains everything newer GPUs have problems rendering in sony vegas

>>58775348
Premiere encodes on nvidia via CUDA. No way in hell anybody actually encodes on CPU.

>>58775431
Even reviews couldn't recreate AMDs results.

>>58775479
>cup usage nearing 100%
>"no I'm certain it's using the gpu!"
>gpu peak not even at 100%
/thread

>>58775168
>/v/ pajeet
Literally cancer and shit mixed together.

>>58775634
There are limitations on the GPU that the CPU does not have, similar to how the entire OS just doesn't run off the GPU. Try to encode hi12p with the GPU you dumb faggot

Historically it has always been that the CPU produces higher quality encodes, look at any review where they autistically zoom in and show the lower quality.

File: 1455641418570.jpg (144KB, 805x949px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 805x949px

>>58775366
>>replace hd7750 with rx460
>>barely any faster in the games I play
maybe it's because the 460 is barely faster than the 7750?
>sidegrading

>>58775168
>R7 250

You fucked up. Should have just got an RX 470 or 480. They're cheap, and would have been a solid performance increase. If you can't scrape together $150 for a 470 you need to have a serious look at your life.

File: 1480225412229.png (200KB, 578x691px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 578x691px

>>58775488
>buy FX8350
>everything runs fantastic
Feels great

>>58775168
>buying an r7 250
>in 2017 no less
wtf

>>58775168
Update your drivers
Switch to Windows 10
Update your video editing software.

>>58778739
what is the hd6850 equivalent to in the rx4xx series? so I don't side grade?

>>58779418
It was 40 dollhairs (after MIR)

>>58779549
hd6850~=hd7790
while
hd7850~=rx460

just get the 470

>>58775168
>Should I expect the same shit if I get an RX 460? Worse performance than almost literally decade-old hardware?

yes, go buy rx 470 you cuck

>>58779300
>everything runs fantastic
>at 20-40fps
>with 0fps stutters all the times

AMD retards are so fucking dumb that you could mistake them with console plebs

>>58775187
OP is probably poor or has other priorities.

File: nf.png (11KB, 569x258px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 569x258px

>>58779418
would it be a upgrade from this?

I dont know op you tell me
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sph6cjJeRdI

You know op your not suppose to take passmark scores so literally. For instance the gtx 940m has the same score as the intel hd 530 or similary to the 520. But in real world performance the intel hd graphics does worser in gaming. Because it has less features/capabilities that the gtx has

>>58775187
kek

>>58782381
Both of these.

>>58782406
>unironically not running windows
It's well past 2012, I seriously hope you guys don't do this

>>58782567
Normally I hate that cunt but

>I'm gonna be taking a look at the R7 240. A product that sucks, and is cheap

had me giggle

>>58783237

if you can look beyond all the memfagging, linus and especially techquickie are actually decent while being mildly entertaining.

>>58778324
>Historically it has always been that the CPU produces higher quality encodes, look at any review where they autistically zoom in and show the lower quality.

that's great and all, but WHY?

>>58775556

Would let her poo in my loo

>>58775168
>every southern actress isn't southern nor is she an actress
feels so fucking bad man.