>spend hours installing LFS and making custom buildscripts

>>58774900
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_cost#Loss_aversion_and_the_sunk_cost_fallacy

File: 1476426252824.png (117KB, 1465x1007px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1465x1007px

Yep, many have learned this lesson.

>>58774910
if only it was as easy as using arch
>>58774909
I fixed the issue by getting binary packages of heavy shit like chrome/thunderbird/virtualbox

your time isnt wasted brother.

linux is the future and you now have a much deeper understanding of the underlaying layers then an average ubuntu user

you will be able to troubleshoot and tailor any distro to your liking and if you wish to continue down your path you could :) no losses are made.

reminder: average people today spend their time on social media or watch tv/stream/game

id personally keep at it because my own LFS experiemental distro has since evolved as i progressed and met blockades in my line of work and its adapted and now i use it for my business OS and i have multiple iterations that i base off this for certain devices or architectures

>>58774910
Arch is a good lesson to learn, though. Not in the sense of it wasting your time, but in terms of how much you get out of putting time in. It can be worth it, depending on your application. People don't understand this.