Bing >Beautiful wallpapers >Incredible design >Bing

File: tmp_21490-1467360607907-770566193.jpg (175KB, 523x693px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 523x693px

>>58753686
>Using google or bing
>not using the superior ixquick

Enjoy the botnet faggot.

>>58753783
>superior ixquick
hahaha. I even use ixquick ( not startpage ) and that shit is nowhere near superior.

I don't need to look at a snowy mountain when I want to search for torrents now do I?

does anyone use qwant?

yeah yeah, french company, probably cucked as fuck. but they have similar privacy features to duckduckgo and the layout is quite nice. the search results are ok. honestly i try to get away from the google botnet every few months but i end up going back when i actually need the correct/relevant answer fastest.

>>58753783
huh.

I was about to whip up a bunch of counterexamples
but it looks like ixquick works today

normally I can never find anything via them

>>58753686
Yeah, the problem is that I want decent search results, no a really beautiful horse shit.

>>58753686
whoa..... So that is.............. the power of microsoft........................

>>58753686
Good job! 2 BIng points have been deposited into your account

File: google_nigger.png (250KB, 495x446px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 495x446px

>>58754274
just reminder that bing points are region locked just as rest of bing windows phone and cortana

2017

File: Яндекс - Mozilla Firefox (Private Browsing).png (378KB, 1608x967px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1608x967px

>>58753686
Yandex is better than both

>>58753783
>>58754092
>>58754458

These all are botnet. YaCy is absolutely the only search engine that isn't botnet.

>>58754458

yandex is good for russian indie porn games

>>58754472
I like Yandex (: Im also use and recommend Yandex.DNS

>>58753686
Google
>good search results

Bing
>bad search results

Huh, I wonder why no one uses Bing as a search engine.

Bing
>Shit indexing
Google
>You can actually find shit

Not that it important but:
Bing
> Works in China

>>58754564
Not important at all, really. Posting offtopic and dumb stuff outside /b/ tier boards is prohibited, btw.

bing is only useful for porn videos

>>58753686
sanjeet, pls

>>58754524
>.t Russian NSA imployee
Пpивeт. 2 rubels have been deposited into your account.

>Google users
1.600.000.000
>Bing users
400.000.000

And Bing is the second most used search engine.

Sorry for no source, I got it off a Microsoft deck at work.

>>58754820
>Sorry for no source, I got it off a Microsoft deck at work.
400 mil. forced bing users, because those people are too lazy and stupid to get off Internet Explorer or Edge, which have bing as the default home page.

>>58753686
>using search engines
>not mashing IPs to fetch directly the pages you look for
Anon do you even BBS?

>>58754781
I told you I work with hryvni not rubli! >:(

>>58754843
Same can be said for IE and Edge and Bing still out ranks them.

I wonder why since it's so shit. Where else does it come baked in? In some program installations sure, but does that warrant 400M?

>>58754472
Interesting, I will have to checkout it out. How do results fare vs google or bing?

>Using a search engine
>Not indexing the web yourself

What are you, a fucking normie?

>>58754212
>>58754527
>>58754537
Can you give me an example of what you can't find easily with bing, but with Google?

File: 1388144136534.jpg (55KB, 358x469px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 358x469px

>>58754870
>not using your own DNS server to go Off The Grid and stuff
Anon pls

>>58754910
kill yourself you dumb tranny

>>58755065
just watch as this post gets no fucking replies (beyond mine obvsly)

Google
>Actually what I fucking searched for

File: 798.png (306KB, 593x540px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 593x540px

>>58755065
>>58755416

I've said it before, bing is god tier for searching porn. Google not so much. That's the only time I'll use bing, to search for porn.

I can walk to the Opera house everyday

>>58753686
>>Beautiful wallpapers

I find these distracting and unnecessary.

>>58755550
This is the only good reason to use Bing.

>>58755550
Came to post this.

File: bingiton.png (134KB, 1344x1178px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1344x1178px

bing it on bitches!

>>58754944
The 400m is probably from bing-ing 'google' and accidental Cortana searches in win 10. Don't forget that Bing is godlike for finding porn it seems.

File: 1485830780331.jpg (10KB, 250x230px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x230px

>>58753686
>2017
>Google is STILL the leading cause of the cancer known as "endless whitespace fucking everywhere that no one likes"

How come no one has put a stop to this yet?

>>58759511
I like it white.
But there are browser extensions that let you put background images on Google's homepage.

File: jfo0EB5.png (463KB, 855x522px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 855x522px

Function over Design senpai

File: 8-inch-floppy.jpg (14KB, 430x319px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 430x319px

>>58759511
Just because you like tacky things doesn't mean everyone does. I don't need a fucking wallpaper in the background of my search engine to waste my bandwidth and time.

File: e25ef67b8c88d0344aab82bfaf9b3ba2.jpg (60KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x375px

>>58755550
say, thank you poo sir

File: 1420331524848.jpg (48KB, 283x255px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 283x255px

>>58753783

>ixquick
>Not using superior duckduckgo

>>58753783
>>58754458
>>58754472
>>58754870
>>58755058
>>58755089
>Not using a combination of dictionaries, thesauruses and encyclopedias to search for information

Git gud faggots, only I am able to truly escape the botnet.

>>58760782

Those are proprietary and aren't even hosted P2P. YaCy is still better.

>>58760567
why don't you duckduckgofuckyourself

>>58755065
It's not about being able to find, not since 10 years ago maybe. It's about finding it QUICKLY, with as few clicks as possible.

>>58761751
and what did you search for with Bing, that required more clicks than Google?

File: Screenshot_20170202-095510.png (288KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1080x1920px

>>58755065
>>58755416
>>58761844

File: Screenshot_20170202-095520.png (158KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1080x1920px

>>58755065
>>58755416
>>58761844
Plus that's a really stupid question. If people use google there's nothing that took them more clicks with bing since they never even opened the page. Idiot.

File: bing.jpg (11KB, 200x111px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 200x111px

>Bing pays you to use it
>Google doesn't
Google Pajeets BTFO

>>58753686
Google wins this round.

File: googlevsbing.png (259KB, 1600x902px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1600x902px

>>58755065
Google more often puts what you are searching for on the first page. You will find what you are after on Bing as well but either you will need to be more specific to get it to show up higher or you will have to dig through more pages.

For example

>>58753686
Only females with bitch feelings are attracted to aesthetics. That explains why faggots and sluts go for iPhones instead of Windows Phone or Blackberry.

Function > Form

>>58761927
>Windows phone
>Function

>>58761949
People ditched it because not enough social media crap for them to post their selfies and garbage thoughts.

There was nothing wrong with that phone.

>>58761871
>>58761878
>mobile
opinion discarded

>>58753686
Also bing is much better for image searching porn, also has video previews in the thumbnail on hover annnd its own player so you click a vid and don't have to go to youtube.

>>58755065
anything not in English

>>58754092
>implying duckduckgo is not a botnet

>>58762261
Where did I give my opinion? lol. And if you use a laptop when walking around... I don't think I need to say anything.