Do you still use Microsoft Office on Windows? If so, what version?

The latest inside a VM without internet access. Fucking thing phones home more than Windows 10, Chrome and E.T. combined

Office 2000-2003 is what I put on Windows if I happen to be installing it for someone. No activation shit (at least office 2003 VL). Sane UI. And some basic .docx/.xlsx/.pptx support via the Office 2007 Compatibility pack (which works with Office 2000-2k3, but you need all the service packs.) There was a torrent I found on TPB with Office 2000 + all the updates with a convenient bat file to install all of them.

>>58752639
google docs only because it does everything I need it to do and I am constantly on different computers I like picking up exactly where I left off.

2007
bought it in college/too lazy to buy a new edition

>>58752639
Windows 10 and office 365 (paid by my college)

>>58752639
Windows 7 and Office 365 because university provides it free.

File: 1203621661509.jpg (25KB, 525x355px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 525x355px

>>58752671

I got office 2010 free (and printer, and crappy laptop I don't use) because I qualified for DSA (Disabled student allowance).

>>58753477
So instead of money they give you hardware? Weird.

Anyway, how's Office 2010 compared to the earlier versions?

I have to. I have to share stuff with others almost every day. No, I won't become a Televangelist to convert them to LaTeX for you.

>>58753744
>convert them to LaTeX for you
That's an unreasonable request. Requesting that you "print" a document to a PDF file would be reasonable.

>>58753744
i thought all the cool kids had moved to google docs for group assignments

>>58753877

I deal with a lot of lawyers and other such menial jobs that want their documents to be fast-out fast-in and good-enough.

The notion that everyone is either typing notes in notepad.exe or writing Scientific Papers for NASA is stupid.

File: Microsoft Excel - Book1.png (102KB, 1056x564px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1056x564px

>>58752639
Office 2010. Alt: LibreOffice.
MS Office 2013 and 2016 are botnets and have shit font rendering.

>>58753384
This

>>58754215
Is that Office 2010 in the screenshot? I thought its menus were in all caps.

File: cute cat.jpg (55KB, 899x899px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 899x899px

>>58754215
why does aero feel so comfy on my eyes?

>>58754252
Yes, 2010. Only 2013 has them in caps afaik.

>>58754281
Familiarity breeds comfort, especially at young age. If you grew up with System 6, it would be the same for you.

>>58752639
Office 2016

>>58753701
I get Office 365 from school.

I hate it. On Mac it's buggy with older features on documents.

It also phones home ONCE. A. WEEK.

Just to check up on me having a valid sub. But older versions of office are buggy on Sierra.

So here I am.

>>58752639
I don't even use windows, but I usually install WPS.

(((emacs)))

File: 1234.jpg (173KB, 1319x797px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1319x797px

Word 97

>>58752639
I've always had a better overall experience with LibreOffice, except for Impress, which sucks major ass and is borderline unusable unless you want to make a blank b&w text-only presentation with the default font settings.

>>58754436
Dat 256-color graphic. Hard to believe it's been 20 years already.

File: Delphi1Installer.gif (37KB, 643x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 643x480px

>>58755044
It's 16 colors. Moreover, just like pic related, it's the standard, stock 16-color Windows 3.x+ palette. It's impressive what some did with it.

File: Screenshot (15).png (56KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1920x1080px

>>58752639

2013, to lazy to install a newer one

>>58754215
That looks so nice

>>58753336
>>58753744
>>58753779
>>58754215

If it isnt as flexible and capable as InDesign, yet also easier to use, its well behind the curve of where it should be.

> current year, just making things basically the same as they always was
> not incorporating every awesome thing anyone else ever thought of
> and making it easy enough for a pleb to use


> LibreOffice
They havent fixed Tables support to reflect the functionality in ms office or indesign yet, its a pain in the ass to adjust columns

im not even using it until they fix this, I tend to put a shit ton of tables in the things I make

> also im not creating an anchored frame just to plop my table on the left or right side of the document and have the text flow around it . . . I shouldnt have to do 2 or 3 other things just to make the table do this.

> and it still fucking moves around unexpectedly

> and table stuff can even make libreoffice crash and corrupt the document too

and if im not, wordpad is usually good enough (or dare I say, photoshop text layers)

File: tables fubar.jpg (56KB, 520x435px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 520x435px

>>58756233
this gets me so fucking mad you wouldn't believe it

...insert a column... it suddenly ADJUSTS all the other fucking columns that I tediously sized to perfection, because the table is defined first and foremost based on its overall width (not as a function of the sum of its column widths)

So then I have to go and re-do all of the widths of the columns.

I wish I could kill whoever made OpenOffice and LibreOffice.

This is the reason why I even bother using Word2007.

But really it isnt even good enough, I have to resort to using a pirated InDesign which runs uber fucking slow on my computer.

>>58756338
I had to google an example of their unforgiveable tables system because I dont even have OpenOffice or LibreOffice *Installed*

Also I tend to use Kingsoft Office for any of my other word/excel needs. Its a little backwards but it does about the same job as 2000/2003.

As least they dont fuck up the goddamn TABLES.