I want to present a project that is too ambitious, I'm a

You're only going to learn as much as the effort you're going to put into learning something, OP.

>>58734585
>memorize and learn with the least effort
have someone else do it, and then claim you did it

>>58734585
>I want to present a project that is too ambitious, I'm a very weak type, so I hate to study or read.
so you're an idiot then?

I have a very advanced attention deficit, and unlike you, contribute ideas, go back to / b / nigger

>>58734797
No, legitimately too intelligent to learn by heart and spend time understanding things rather than pretending to be knowledgeable.

>>58735425
silly anon

you learn with your brain not your heart

>>58735425
>too intelligent to learn
intelligence literally means "capacity to learn"

if learning isn't as easy as breathing for you
then you're not as intelligent as you've tricked yourself into believing

it's like saying "I'm too much on fire to be burning"

>>58734935
>I don't want to think and figure out solutions on my own, somebody do it for me!

>>58735616
You don't get it (because you're an idiot and obviously not because I failed to convey my thought)

I'm saying learning things from the bottom is harder but more valuable in the long run although hypocrites like you think you're stupid.

>>58736842
I'm not the one claiming "I'm too intelligent to learn"

OP is legitimately an idiot with no understanding of what he's actually asking precisely because he didn't even take the time to even examine his own sentences for possible lack of clarification

>not because I failed to convey my thought
except this is exactly what you did

"learn by heart" is a metaphor which implies you repeatedly perform a process to the point it becomes internalized

and being too intelligent means you have a high capacity to learn, which literally means you DON'T have to repeat processes and concepts excessively to internalize them

you getting pissy for failing to even realise this and jumping straight to insults just show how unintelligent you are, especially since you expect other people to put in the thought for you

an intelligent person would reexamine what he said if he believes he's not getting his point across instead of just immediately assuming there's no way he could've made a mistake and start blaming the other person for not "understanding"

remember self-awareness is an aspect of intelligence
immediately assumming someone else to be the problem while IGNORING the possibility that YOU may have made a mistake is both ignorant and narcissistic.

you are the hypocrite here and you don't even realize it

File: cd9e327200972c36f8dda7f75a57df54.jpg (91KB, 625x804px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 625x804px

>>58735425
>I wanna invent magical shit from animu
>legitimately too intelligent to learn
Let me guess, you also think that pajeets are stealing yer jerbs because they'll do it for less, rather than because they'll actually do it to begin with.