In which the C++ standards committee gets apocalyptically BT

>>58722064
>literally who
why are you referring to yourself like that?

>>58722064
wtf do you even mean?

>>58722064
So you are looseont..., right?

However, color me not surprised, C++11 should have contained modules.

>>58722179
As the autist points out, C++ templates are a horrid clusterfuck that make literally no sense once you get beyond elementary stuff. This is why NASA and Lockheed Martin don't permit the use of templates in any of their C++ codebases.

>>58722064
Hilarious as this is, why does he even think C++ can be fixed?

I read the thread.

Why do they all sound like a bunch of fuckwits with a stick up their ass?

How can you be less likeable than a guy who posts in all caps?

>>58722064
>Wow, this thread totally beats me.

>I always thought, and maybe I still think, that there was something about being a programmer, and a C++ one more specially, that highly relates with having very effective comunication skills and focused problem solving skills applied to comunciation (i.e. don't complain, as it does nothing, but point and colaborate, etc). After all, a program boils down to a written expression of intent very carefully crafted out to produce a precise result. So I find it very very unusual to see a programmer failing so misserably at comunication something that is intended to have a specific, positive outcome.

>His approach is of a totally unproductive, comunicationally ignorant and socially broken kind. One that I often see in other "technical" areas, most notably in physics, where everyone seems to believe is a genious and all others are retarded, just as in this case.

>I know there are lots of forums with equally uneducated programmers, but IME they are often much, much less "sophisticated" than std-proposals. So like I said, I still can't believe I'm really reading this here.


>--
>Fernando Cacciola
>SciSoft Consulting, Founder
>http://www.scisoft-consulting.com

lol this guy

>WHY YOU THINK C++ IS SO FUCKING SLOW?
>BECAUSE ALL YOU FUCKING RETARDS NEED A BUNCH OF FUCKING POWERPOINT DIAGRAMS TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING
Chuckled, I admit.

>google discussion groups
Damn.
And I thought crawling through threads on mailing lists you're not subscribed to is a painful process.


After all this years I can in all fairness admit imageboards (whether anonymous or not) have figured out the best way to display a discussion between multiple people.

>>58722064
>>58722230

let me tell you that the best course of action is to abondon languages that don't work.

I'm using the chrome flavour of javascript for almost everything. you don't want a web application? I'm putting a webview in your qt.

you need api? well your api's gonna be php controller + python model.

everything else can go fuck off.

>>58722064

He mad tho

File: 1479920463470.jpg (34KB, 710x720px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 710x720px

N-No bully

>>58722064

What I don't understand is that, in general, some genres of tech have plateaued.

They are simply being reinvented or modified slightly without any good reason, and, consequently, things get more complicated for no good reason.

Actually, I am going to make an educated guess - capitalism.

As much as I don't like what I have seen from Steve Jobs, he mentioned this.

The innovation starts at the beginning. Then it just becomes a clusterfuck to maintain has other people snatch it up for the $$$.

They have to justify their existence financial quarter by quarter. They can't just say, "This is pretty good as is.", or else they will be fired.

>>58723560
And this has something to do with this thread because...?
>inb4 programming languages have plateaued
They are far from it.

File: kRFu3R4.jpg (46KB, 550x384px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 550x384px

>>58722492
I just want to say thanks