Is there any modern day text based operating systems If so

>>58712785
You could just load up any GNU/Linux distribution and work from the terminal. I don't understand the question.

install gentoo

Freedos

>>58712785
Linux is the main thing actually used as such an OS, and the only thing I personally would recommend.

People even make flurries of virtual machines and containerized linuxes all over the clouds.

Linux, *BSD, etc.

Linux though I can't imagine why you'd want to use just the terminal.

Yes it's called init 1.

>>58712785
You can just do like >>58712838 said and use a TTY
alternatively, there's also the BSDs, other unices like solaris, hurd, and >>58712895

basically every *nix OS that can be installed without a GUI

FreeDOS

>>58713060
DOS derivatives are still plenty shit, even if they are better than what you worked with back then.

Just go with Linux or, if you must, at least BSD. Pretty much no point doing anything else if you want "modern" and "best".

>>58713038

I'd just like to interject for moment. What you're refering to as init, is in fact, systemd/init, or as I've recently taken to calling it, systemd plus init. init is not a startup daemon unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning systemd system made useful by the systemd boot manager, QR code generator and vital system components comprising a full startup daemon as defined by Lennart Poettering.

File: 1483743190853.jpg (48KB, 492x449px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 492x449px

>>58712785
XNU/Darwin

It's literally CLI MacOS

UNIX

>>58714603
>XNU/Darwin
Fucking stop, it's just Darwin.

>>58714722
darwin is the name of the kernel and could imply using just MacOS

>>58714938
Darwin is the name of the OS OS X is based on. XNU is Darwin's kernel.

>>58712785
Arch Linux

various Unix systems
and Gnu/linux based.

i normally use console mode unless web browsing or virtualization

gui is optional

>>58712785
Why would you want to do this?

NEXT QUESTION:

Are there any operating systems that are 100% graphical? As in they aren't built on or with a CMD shell, and possibly without any words at all? Would it even be possible?

File: tmp_18382-1485188187950-1989066638.jpg (314KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 1000x1000px

>>58713097
>DOS derivatives are still plenty shit
Come back here and say that in my face

>>58715632
Mac OS

>>58715632
Every Windows since XP.

>>58715598
he's probably trying to be ascetic

>>58714961
>>58714938
>>58714722
found the fucking apple shills. too bad steve jobs is dead and you can't suck his cock.

>>58715642
>>58715649
No no, those have shell that can be accessed.
You're missing the point. I mean an OS written in in a language with out words. Not a single word appearing anywhere in the OS's daily use, or even in it's code. Everything is graphical. Renaming a file would require drawing a picture for instance. Is it even possible?

>>58715632
>without any words at all?
That's how?

Old Windows, classic MacOS and BeOS/Haiku have GUI implemented in the core.

>>58715676
How is stating facts shilling for Apple? Fuck off, dipshit.

>>58715684
Mac OS doesn't have a CLI. I didn't read your full post and it of course has words, but definitely meets your first requirement.

>>58714995
Only because pacman always fucks up xorg.conf

There's a bare metal Forth OS.

http://www.forthos.org

>>58717204
Forth is fucking retarded. Worst language.

>>58717478
t. retard nigger

>>58717478
This board really needs IDs. I suspect you make 1/2 the posts here kike.

>>58712785

Try a minimal Debian install. You won't be disappointed.

>>58717204
I've always wanted to write an OS in Forth for Open Firmware

>>58717505
It's practically an OS already. Even has networking.

Forth is disgusting

>>58717526
I know, I want to build upon it

>>58717527
Actually it's the most redpilled programming language out there, excepting HolyC, Lisp, and Smalltalk.

>>58717555
>A programming language can be redpilled
Fuck off.

Forth has disgusting vomit inducing system. Deal with it.

>>58717546
>get Powerbook G4
>go nuts
Already have all your drivers and stuff ready anon.

Also I have an OLPC XO-1.5 which has OpenFirmware.

>>58717504
As soon as you start vim and realise there's no way to get 256 colours in a tty you will be.

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 4.47.29 AM.png (43KB, 596x462px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 596x462px

>>58712785
FreeDOS, or nearly any GNU/Linux or BSD distro without a GUI. You can also start Mac OS X in single user mode by holding Command + Shift + S on boot. Not sure why you'd want to do this though, as it's a pain in the ass and a GUI makes like better. Time for new hardware?

>>58714722
XNU is the kernel, you stupid cunt.

>>58715705
>Mac OS doesn't have a CLI
You make life so painful for those who have to read the idiotic Aspergers-tier trash you post here. Mac OS X has single user mode which is all text based. It also has a whole bunch of terminal emulators available. See pic related, dumbfuck.

>>58717561
>has disgusting vomit inducing system
You're a fucking CHINEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE or a POOOOOOOOOO your awful usage is showing through.

Sorry chinky poo you have to go back, cancelling all H1Bs. You can work for poo tokens and smog.

Forth is redpilled as fuck, all people who are white know this.

>>58717571
>You make life so painful for those who have to read the idiotic Aspergers-tier trash you post here. Mac OS X has single user mode which is all text based. It also has a whole bunch of terminal emulators available. See pic related, dumbfuck.
It's all the same chinkpoo, in every thread, just making bait replies. It gets (You)'s and generates captcha solutions so he's doing his part.

>>58717561
>system
Syntax*
Not sure why it came out like that

>>58717581
I'm not paid in any way. Now attack my arguments I've put forth or leave this board, you tech illiterate brainlet.

>>58717565
I've got more hardware than I could ever possibly need, I just need to learn Forth and more about operating systems

>>58717567
>256 colours in a tty
Why would you even want this?

>>58717571
>XNU is the kernel, you stupid cunt.
I never claimed otherwise, you braindead mongoloid.
>Mac OS X
Mac OS and OS X are two entirely different operating systems, you fucking buffoon.

>>58717593
Try out the OS I linked. All source is included.

>>58717597
>Hur dur colors are bad

>>58717616
Just admit you're Jewish, you'll feel better.

>>58717607
>Mac OS and OS X
No, they're not. The only difference is the name. You're the braindead mongoloid here.

>>58717642
They are literally entirely different things. This is indisputable.

This board really needs IDs.

>>58717666
So Satan, tell me the gigantic difference between Fag OS 10.11 and 10.12. It's the same shit under a different name.

>>58717763
The differences between OS X 10.11 and macOS 10.12 aren't much at all. The differences between Mac OS 9 (and its preceding versions) and Mac OS X 10.0 (and every subsequent version), on the other hand, are quite substantial.

>>58713048
hurd is a kernel, you illiterate dumbfuck

File: fuck you pepe.jpg (38KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 495x495px

>>58712785
TempleOS

>>58717567

#justwintoddlerthings

Don't fall for the shit bait anons. The poster above is a CIA nigger.

>>58717797
>Mac OS 9
That wasn't at all what I was talking about. Apple's BSD distribution has been renamed to Mac OS from OS X with the release of 10.12.

>>58717875
>That wasn't at all what I was talking about
It's exactly what I >>58715642 was talking about though.
>Apple's BSD distribution has been renamed to Mac OS from OS X with the release of 10.12
I never said otherwise. Also, 10.12+ is macOS, not Mac OS, which seems to be the source of your confusion.

File: disappointment.jpg (30KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x400px

>>58717921
We had Mac OS 9, then we moved on to 10. We are still on Mac OS 10. It always was and always will be a BSD distribution made by a company with a fruit as their logo. Why are we even having this discussion?

>>58717970
>Why are we even having this discussion
Because you are having an extremely difficult time understanding this very simple thing. I was not talking about OS X, I was talking about Mac OS 9 and friends. You then jumped in, started flailing your arms like the retard you are, and spouted irrelevant facts about an irrelevant OS.

I'd like to say Plan9 but I'm not sure if that's even still being developed by anyone, wasn't there a fork of it made a few years ago?

File: GentooNoX.png (5KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 1024x768px

>>58712785
Gentoo

>>58712882

Strangely relevant

>>58714564
Underrated post.

>>58714564
>>58718287

> being this paranoid about licensing

No wonder half of the free software fanatics are either in jail (Reiser) or killing themselves (Ian).

I know the post was sarcasm, but still, they exist.

>>58712785

Minix

>>58718713
Is it still developed?

>>58718922

Yep.

Version 3 was recently released. It still has no USB support, but it will follow soon.

Minix is a micro kernal, of course, it's fleshed out with FreeBSD bells and whistles.

>>58719066
>Yep.
Why, why? Why he still does it? Why he keeps developing? Why he persists?

>>58718022
Check 9front.

>>58719130

He keeps being given money. That's why it's being developed. It's been going since 1987, I think?

Of course, Linux is a fork of Minix.

It's the most secure kernal that's publicly available, apparently.

>>58717808
CTRL+F -> TempleOS

Nice, my friend!!!!!

>modern
>>58712895
>>58713060
>>58717571
freedos is 16bit, that's not modern.

>>58719227
And nobody works over it save for professor himself.

>>58719293
16-bit doesn't make FreeDOS non-modern, they had a new release recently.

>>58719324
>16-bit doesn't make FreeDOS non-modern
In an area of 64bit, yes, it does.
only allowing access to 16MB of RAM is a fucking joke.

>>58719305

There is a team, apparently.

http://www.minix3.org/

It make the average Linux distro look like Windows Vista....

>>58719476
>16-bits
>16MB

>>58712838
fpbp.

Are you some kind of hipster trying to get coolness points with the internet?

>>58719227
>Linux is a fork of Minix.
no it isn't

>>58719505
>triggered.

>>58719492
Whats the use if there is no USB support and no software? What will I do with it, browse 4chan on 15 year old laptop? Unless it can be molded into something usable for PoS or some shit.

>>58719521

It uses BSD software.

I'm not bothered about the lack of USB support, I can simply plug a USB drive into another computer and copy the file over the network.

>>58719494
2^16 = 65536, or 64 MB

>>58719574
That's 64KB, way off from the 16MB you originally put

>>58717875
XNU is not Unix, and therefore not BSD.

>>58719512
>being 12

>>58719833
>fork a BSD OS
>name it Totally Not Unix BSD
>it's suddenly not Unix anymore
That's not how things work.

>>58720227
>mach kernel
>Unix
You can only pick one

>>58720293
>mach kernel
>OS X
You also can only pick one.

>>58720323
XNU is just a modified mach kernel.

>>58720341
Mach is a part of XNU but XNU is not wholly Mach. It's therefor blatantly false to say that XNU is Mach.

ubuntu server comes with no gui mate

>>58717921
>allow me to play with an inconsistency in naming so I can fall back from my argument if need be!
fuck off, shit for brains

>>58712785
Linux you retard

>>58715684
you could write the code in piet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language#Piet

>>58712785
How about siri, cortana et c.?
Not "real" OSs, but if iOS counts as an OS, they should too.

>>58712785
Are you, perhaps, retarded?

>>58721538
Linux is just the kernel you dumb nigger

File: ISHYGDDT.png (457KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 600x450px

>>58722983
>Unironically taking Stallman seriously
>Not calling it what Linus himself calls it

File: youareanigger.png (9KB, 671x101px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 671x101px

>>58717808
You dumb fuck nigger cattle.

File: KolibriOS.png (57KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x600px

>>58715632
KolibriOS

>>58717571
Umad bro

File: 5x-dos-a559929a888425c7cd465e0ce76fc149-WordPerfect 5.1 - Edit.png (7KB, 720x400px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 720x400px

In a fucked up way I miss this kind of computing.

>>58721055
I'm not falling back from any argument, you dumb nigger. If I meant OS X I would have typed OS X. I typed Mac OS because that is what Mac OS(pre-X) is called. It is not my fault in the slightest that that dipshit can't tell the difference between Mac OS (the name for Apple's old non-UNIX OS) and macOS (Apple's new retarded name for OS X). I use OS X daily and its terminal emulator just as often, I'm quite aware of its presence in the OS.

>>58717607
Arguably, "Mac OS" could refer to any of Apple's desktop operating systems, however "MacOS" (as in one word) is the rebranded name for what was until recently referred to as "Mac OS X" (or simply "OS X").

>>58719066
>kernal
[TRIGGERED]

>>58719227
>Of course, Linux is a fork of Minix.
Nope, and Linus and Tanenbaum have clashed many times over operating system design. Really the only connection is that Minix was the main unofficial Unix-like OS when Linux got started, and Linus originally marketed his kernel to the Minix group. They may have borrowed some ideas from each other, but they're two completely distinct operating systems. The original Linux kernel was pretty much developed from scratch, any Minix-inspired features were only brought in later on.

>>58719293
BIOS is 16 bit, does that mean it's non-modern? And kind of the whole point of DOS is that it has EXTREMELY minimal system requirements, some of the areas where it's still being used for example are old process control systems running on literal 286s. To be a valid replacement for proprietary DOSes, it should be able to run on anything in the x86 family, at least theoretically. But that's just the bootloader and file system, a lot of applications are 32-bit or maybe even 64-bit (though it's questionable what benefit there is of using 64-bit pointers on something with the DOS memory model).

>>58719476
That's presumably from the 286 addressing mode, which uses 24-bit addresses. 2^24 / (1024^2) = 16 MB

>>58719574
That would be 64KB, not MB. I think many versions of DOS limit the PER-PROCESS memory to that much, because of silly intel addressing modes. But the total can be much more.

>>58720383
So is OS X BSD or XNU?

>>58722471
Uh, isn't Siri/Cortana just a voice interface? So it's basically a shell, not a full OS. It's like saying bash or CMD.EXE or FLTK is an OS. iOS is a full OS because it includes a kernel, file system, drivers, program loader and so on.

How would you browse the internetz with a CLI OS?

>>58726815
With a text-based browser

File: freedos.png (37KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x600px

>>58712785
I am a proud user of GNU/Linux and can tell you really don't need to use a GUI if you don't want to. My favorite tools are ranger for file manager, transmission--daemon/transmission-remote-cli for torrents, kpcli for password manager, and vim for text editor. You can use GNU screen as window manager, that coupled with a web browser like links/lynx or, even better, NetSurf with the framebuffer, is all you need.

The alternative is pic related, FreeDOS is my second favorite OS.

File: 650212013e621a4bc2f2264115bbdf10_medium.jpg (35KB, 640x377px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x377px

Support FreeVMS!!!

The real-time operative system.

Main page http://www.freevms.net/
Github mirror https://github.com/ztmr/FreeVMS

>>58728540
>ded

>>58730731
It's not though. Why lie, are you Jewish?

>>58731222
> Latest commit b3758c9 on Dec 16, 2013 BERTRAND Joël Typo.

>>58719227
>Linux is a fork of Minix.
Linux is a completely distinct OS. It wasn't built using any source code it only used concepts that Linus learned through studying the MINIX kernel and reading the textbooks. Linus did initially use Minix as a development environment to put together the first versions of the Linux kernel but after the GNU userland was ported over Linus completely switched to GNU+Linux and there hasn't been any direct relationship between the two OSes since.

>>58719253
haha me too