>be Samsung >finally make strides to a good frontal de

File: 1473948280866.jpg (30KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 512x512px

>>58708995
Steve is laughing his ass off in hell right now

This honestly sounds like a bad joke

>>58709043

Would you put it past Samsung though?

>>58708995
Why don't they just write it on the back?

File: 1484700356193.gif (354KB, 240x200px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 240x200px

>>58709073
I think because the LG G6 is going to also have a plain front with no bezels/large branding.

>>58709073
They did. They want it on the front too

It's hilarious not because samsung might be actually retarded to do such thng (it's safe to expect this leak will cause a massive shitstorm and samsung will pull out of this idea) but because samsung thinks they're like apple and people buy samsung phones due to brand loyalty and not due to them offering decent set of features for smaller money.

File: 1485128672777.jpg (6KB, 250x203px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x203px

>>58709114
I really want the catastrophe. Especially after the Note fiasco. You just know some higher up approved this (if its real) thinking "oh boyo boy this'll get people to trust ol samsung again when they see the hottest toy on the block is a SAMSUNG!!" and then nobody buys it because a giant "SAMSUNG" is blocking War of Clansville.