> We will have to wait 3-5 years to have a quad core 5ghz

THAT'S NOT HOW PROCESSORS WORK YOU DUMB FUCK.

>>58708275
You are the same normalfag who expects science to create flying cars for no fuckin reason. Just because we think flying cars should exists.
IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THIS!

Fucking AMD cancer I hate if it weren't for AMD intel would have already made graphene chips at 10GHz

>>58708304
>>58708780
>>58708956
AMD internet damage control at full force today folks

>>58708275
well, amd is already clocking higher at lower watts then intel's 8 core, considering amd will be soldering the cpus, not tmi it may be entirely possible to hit 5 across 4 so long as power delivery is sufficient, but likely 4.6 or 4.8 as an upper average.

>>58709786
We get it. Intel has the bigger numbers. Now fuck off Pajeet, your designated shitting cows need attention.

high quality thread