What's the least botnet version of Office that's still functional?
>>58693600
Do you even know what a botnet is?
>>58693600
Office 2007.
>>58693600
2013
>>58693616
>>58693600
2003 with Compatibility Pack for docx/pptx/xlsx
>>58693600
Office 3
>>58693713
unfortunately this
but you will endure the curse of clippy
>>58693600
LibreOffice
>>58693755
kek
>>58693616
New Office versions are "upgrading" and uploading data all the time (like everything on windows 10)... That's why he ironically call it a botnet
>>58693616
Hi, newbieee!
>>58693600
2010
What's the latest version of Office you don't need to crack? (as in you can enter a key and it won't bother verifying it online)
>>58694322
I think 2007
>>58693713
>>58693773
both of these are correct
2013 and beyond are awful and botnet
2007 is like 2010 beta
2003 is unfortunately too old for today
so 2010
or LibreOffice
but if you absolutely need to work with docx, etc, then 2010
that Microsoft Tookit shit works perfectly to crack the KMS activation or whatever
>>58693600
2007
>>58693600
Just use Google Drive, silly.
Don't reject the botnet; embrace it.
2016
stop being a faggot
or run openBSD and never run any software that matters in your life
>>58693600
Libreoffice
>>58693600
every version of Office since 2003 has basically been garbage
>>58697124
> this is what linux memesters literally believe
ONLY versions 2013 and 2016 were actually excellent.
>>58693600
Probably Office365 online. It doesn't even have a botnet. It has a cloudnet.
>>58697174
As good as it is, a botnet is still a botnet. That's why we all use Chrome although we would never admit to it.
>>58696453
>>58698754
No, it sends typing telemetry to Microsoft and queries suggestions based on grammar and spelling.
Libre Office or Google Drive. Both completely free to you.
>>58693600
Office 95.
Should still run with the compatibility code left in windows.
https://is2.4chan.org/g/1485616646947.webm
>>58701401
>No, it sends typing telemetry to Microsoft and queries suggestions based on grammar and spelling.
I've never had office 365 do this.
>>58693661
No, 2013 is broken right out of the box and needs a fucking shit load of updates to even be usable.
>>58693664
Underrated post
>>58694322
If you use volume licenced versions and something like py-kms, you can activate both W10 and Office 2016.
py-kms is free software and multiplatform if you don't want to trust it
>>58697174
kys
>>58693600
2010 is the way to go desu
>>58693600
Why not libreoffice OP? What's wrong with it?
>>58693600
365
>>58701744
>I've never had office 365 do this.
You'd never know, it's web based.
>>58704818
It's not.
>>58693600
LibreOffice. Or, you know, just install WPS or MSOffice and firewall it.
>>58696401
From my experience LibreOffice had flawless docx support, but lacked proper doc support.
I just run the latest in a VM without internet access. Runs smooth enough
I've been using 2010 for years and refuse to use any other version. 2016 is pure cancer.
>>58704844
"It's not"
Ah, because clearly you have NoScript enabled and thus cannot use it. Fuck outta /g/ with your lies, don't come back.
What is the actual harm of using 365?
>>58702319
>implying smart people uses software as is out of the box.
>>58706857
None that is proven.
>he doesn't use Office 2000 installed on Windows 98, so there's zero "home calling" connectivity