Is there perhaps a reason why you aren't editing Wikipedia

There's a /g/entooman wiki here for future generations.

>>58691591
That will be wiped out in the future Nuclear holocaust

>all
>for
>FREE

Actually, I am. Only because I will ask for a scholarship to Canada though.

>>58693469
fuck off, we're full

>>58693569
It's only for a week you stupid leaf.

because any changes are swiftly 'corrected' by the chinese?

Shlomo is already doing a great work

dont tell me what to do DAD

File: d04cf40b70ce9189f5ff6da92058a55d.jpg (38KB, 500x379px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x379px

>>58691555

I'm disgusted by all the posters in this thread.

I give Wikipedia an annual donation of 100 dollars.

>>58694226
They're already drowning in money, don't be stupid and save that.

>>58694534
Your reply has only inspired me to pay 1000 dollars more

>>58695098
Fine by me. I'm an important contributor so you will be paying for my shit.

>>58695098
You lied :(

>>58691555
The Wikipedia team is corrupt. Fuck Wikipedia.

>>58695144
>The Wikipedia team is corrupt.

Evidence?

I have been editing Wikipedia for a decade.

File: wikipedia2.png (499KB, 762x1200px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 762x1200px

>>58691555
Fuck Wikipedia

File: screenshot.png (47KB, 379x499px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 379x499px

>>58695244
Nice fake news, retard!!


https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_inaugurated_as_45th_U.S._president?dpl_id=2805729

>>58695372
>fake news
I can smell the aids on you

>>58695410
Nice response

Really tickled my neural reactors

>>58691555
don't know about other versions of WP, but the german version is basically ANTIFA:The Encyclopedia

>>58695423
You're a faggot.
There is a reason everyone tells you every single day

>>58695430
>but the german version is basically ANTIFA:The Encyclopedia

Are you a retard?

You do realize Wikipedia is based on sources, right?

You do realize anyone can contribute and provide arguments for why their source is credible, correct?

>WAaaaaaah the lefties are trying to get me

File: hm.png (262KB, 680x661px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 680x661px

>>58695433
>gets proven wrong
>waaaaah you're a faggot

Really tickles the nerve endings

>>58695470
I didnt say anythinf before i called you an aids ridden faggot.
;)

>>58695372
Yes, it was on the secondary page, but never the front page like Obama or women's march, you dumb cuck, learn to read

>>58695514
Got any proof of that besides an image which can be easily doctored :)?

Because I provided a link which proved that Wikipedia reported on it :)

>>58695504
le i was a different guy

Nice try, bud ;)

>>58695548
You dumb fucking cuck, I never said they didn't report it! They didn't place it on the English home page like for Obama and the march. God your iq must be potato level

>>58695575
Again, buddy.

Where is the evidence that that was the homepage at the time?

Because the time provided at the top of the image is by someone else, not wikipedia.


Nice try :)

File: Screenshot - 01282017 - 03:12:17 PM.png (524KB, 1920x1056px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1920x1056px

>>58695604

https://web.archive.org/web/20090121183346/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

File: Screenshot - 01282017 - 03:13:38 PM.png (545KB, 1920x1056px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 1920x1056px

>>58695604

https://web.archive.org/web/20170121235614/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

GET BENT

File: Screenshot - 01282017 - 03:15:41 PM.png (555KB, 1920x1056px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 1920x1056px

>>58695604

https://web.archive.org/web/20170122153701/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Fuck Wikipedia and their liberal bias, and fuck George Soros

>>58693569
>we're full
Of migrants, yes.

>>58695650
>>58695665
>>58695691
You do realize that Wikipedia is edited by the public, brainlet?


Why didn't you put the article on the front page?


Oh that's right, because the man is keeping you down :^)

>>58695705
Hahahaha, I tried, I messaged wikipedia directly and they would not respond. Get bent, I proved you wrong, you're a cuck. Smile harder faggot.

>>58693569
Yeah, full of shit.

>>58695729
>Hahahaha, I tried, I messaged wikipedia directly and they would not respond

That is not how it works.


You click 'Edit' on the top right.


Post evidence that you sent a message, little boy ;^)

>>58691555
Possessive faggots revert changes to "their" pages for arbitrary reasons, so I'm done wasting my time. Fucks sake, they were *minor* edits for readability and clarity. Obvious improvement, fit all standards and guidelines as well as the general format of the article. But it's not *their* wording anymore, so no good. Maybe that's only a small subsection of the site's users, but my experience doesn't indicate that. After a couple separate tries I'm not willing to guess-and-check further.

>>58695770
Just report them or go into the 'Talk' section.

>>58695729
>I messaged wikipedia directly and they would not respond

sure you did

>>58695742
>You click 'Edit' on the top right.
Regular users can't just add news to the front page you fucking retard

>>58695860
Still no evidence you contacted Wikipedia, little boy :)

>>58691555
Wana know how I know you're fat?

>>58695870
Still no evidence that regular users can add news to the front page, little girl :) I'm sure they just listen to everyone who asks for news to be added anyways.

>>58691555
wanna know how I know you're fat?

File: the-wall.jpg (237KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 2048x1536px

>>58695737
Well we do have alot of foreign scum/rapefugees so yea I guess we are "full of shit" at this point.

Time to build that ice wall and pick up that rake lads.

>>58695919
No

>>58695786
Trying to talk it out didn't work. Got the equivalent of "No, it's fine." in response. Maybe you're taken more seriously if you have an account, dunno. As for reporting it, there wasn't much to report as far as I could tell. They weren't doing anything objectively wrong, just opposing edits for no good reason. Maybe there's a way to work past that sort of bullshit if you establish yourself in the community, but that's a lot more work than I'm interested. I just wanted to polish up a few rough patches as I came across them, not become a bona fide Wikipedia editor.

>>58695912
Still no evidence, what a cuck, has to make up lies to support his opinion:)

>>58695988
>Maybe you're taken more seriously if you have an account, dunno.

lol, this is why your changes were reverted

You can't have anyone making changes

Make an account and you'll see a difference

>>58696089
Dude, I've proven you multiple times to be a downright liar in this thread. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that just anyone can add news to the main page. You have failed to do so since you are the one making the claim, hence the burden of proof is on YOU, to provide said evidence. Until then, stay butthurt. My point stands that Wikipedia has an extreme bias.

Fact: In Jan of 2009, Obama's inauguration was on the front page
Fact: In Jan of 2007, Trump's inauguration was NEVER on the front page
Fact: I verified this through WayBack Machine and provided links
Fact: The weekend after his inauguration, when 8 years earlier, Obama's was still on the front page, the Womyn's March was on the front page.

THIS PROVES WIKIPEDIA IS A BUNCH OF BIAS KEKS :^)

>>58691555
wanna know how I know you're fat?

>>58696166
Still no evidence that you contacted Wikipedia about this


It's almost as if you are ignoring this on purpose :)

>>58696180
I tweeted at them from my personal account, not going to post that because it's fucking irrelevant. Stay butthurt and continue to dodge the fact that you have not provided any evidence that anyone can add news to the main page. :^)

>>58696204
>not going to post that because it's fucking irrelevant

How convenient :)


I noticed you copied my smiling too, further evidence that you are a cuck ;)

>>58696101
Yeah, bullshit.

>>58696231
PROOF YOU CAN'T JUST ADD NEWS TO THE MAIN PAGE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news

YOU SIR ARE A KEK. I HAVE PROVEN YOU WRONG ON ALL POINTS.

Buh-bye :^)

>>58696204

>>58696235
Nice retort.

Make an account and you'll notice a difference.

>>58696244
WHY DOES C U C K KEEP SHOWING UP AS KEK. WTF MODS

>>58696244
Wow. Really makes ya think, still no evidence whatsoever you contacted them ;)

and now you're sperging out too, what a surprise

>>58696268
>being a newfag

lol :^)

>>58696287
Fact: In Jan of 2009, Obama's inauguration was on the front page
Fact: In Jan of 2007, Trump's inauguration was NEVER on the front page
Fact: I verified this through WayBack Machine and provided links
Fact: The weekend after his inauguration, when 8 years earlier, Obama's was still on the front page, the Womyn's March was on the front page.
Fact: Users can't simply add news to the main page of Wikipedia


BTFO

>>58696268
Get cuck ed

>>58696298
Why are you sperging out? :)

>>58696315
Fact: In Jan of 2009, Obama's inauguration was on the front page
Fact: In Jan of 2007, Trump's inauguration was NEVER on the front page
Fact: I verified this through WayBack Machine and provided links
Fact: The weekend after his inauguration, when 8 years earlier, Obama's was still on the front page, the Womyn's March was on the front page.
Fact: Users can't simply add news to the main page of Wikipedia


Cry harder because you got beat the fuck down in this thread by my superior intellect and reasoning.

>>58693569
Guess we'll just have to nuke you and take the land.

>>58696329
I'm not that guy.

You seem mentally unstable, friend? I'm just asking why you are sperging out.

>>58696375
I'm not sperging out, I just wasn't going to put up with someone lying to my face over and over again and twisting what I said. Dude was a grade-A troll.

>>58696375
wana know how I know you're fat?

>>58696386
wana know how I know you're fat?

>>58691591

Which is why I printed wikipedia out and stored the papers in my storm shelter

>>58696497
You could just download it onto a DVD or something

>>58696375
>>58696386
>>58696390
>>58696436
wanna know how I know you're fat?

>>58696329
This is an outrage. How DARE people not know about Trump in 2007?!?

I worry my edits wouldn't be up to par. Just yesterday I noticed that the Snail W3D phone was not mentioned at all on the page for the Snail company on Wikipedia. There are only mentions of its Mobile division existing.

>>58696505

Implying DVD isn't a dying format. Trees will die before paper does.

>>58691555
Waste of time, since they support the snowball system based on so called citations on topics so dull it would take literally 3 minutes of online research.
If they run out of volunteers, maybe it isn't worth sustaining.
>>58691591
Why again does this still exist?

>>58698463

>Reading comprehension

I said dying, it's not like the rapture/apocalypse/endoftimes will happen tomorrow, give Trump 3 years at the least.