MI6 "Q" is a woman.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/26/the-real-q-is-a-woman-boss-of-mi6-launches-drive-for-female-recruits
This is how i see it:
>>58688731
90% chance that person was born a male.
>>58688731
look at the options:
1. spies don't actually need mad gadgets like in the film, they just need like lipstick and shit to blend in something traditionally a woman would excel at
2. Q doesn't invent shit, just nags at bond for breaking everything. women are bossy and like to nag. perfect fit.
3. boss was lying but its fine nobody would ever find out.
4. woman was hired because muh equality quotas
5. an actual woman who was genuinely interested and capable applied for the position and was hired because she was the best candidate.
so number 5 is probably least believable because in most peoples experience women just aren't interested but that doesn't mean they don't exist and you should feel bad if you think that.
i fucking hope its not a trannie because look they are human and we shouldn't be nasty to them but honestly they are severely fucked in the head and putting them in national security position is asking for trouble
>>58688826
So it's not a female?
>wah, why is [desirable position] not played by a woman?!
>wah, why is [undesirable position] played by a woman?!
>>58688731
Did you just refer to my code as "it"? Did you just assume its gender?
>>58688908
No one know, also RD departament is not 1 person.
>>58689416
>>>
> Anonymous 01/28/17(Sat)12:29:53 No.58689416▶
>>wah, why is [desirable position] not played by a woman?!
>>wah, why is [undesirable position] played by a woman?!
why are you still alive
>>58688731
no wonder IAR is such a piece of shit
>>58689707
Why did you come here from reddit?
It tends to be advantageous to have women in leading positions for tech companies. Because coincidentally they are often the ones that don't get excited over elegance or other such no practical features of tech.
So she can direct the stinking nerd away from exploring useless technology. Increasing productivity.
>>58689707
>Anonymous 01/28/17(Sat)12:16:13 No.58689707▶>>58689722
> >>58689416
> >>>
> > Anonymous 01/28/17(Sat)12:29:53 No.58689416▶
> >>wah, why is [desirable position] not played by a woman?!
> >>wah, why is [undesirable position] played by a woman?!
> why are you still alive
hey fuck you!
>>58689722
KYS. Hate reddit as you
that disgusting freak. the only reason they "drive for female recruits" is to divide and conquer society.
>>58688826
>90%
you mean 99.99% right?