>go to http://beta.unity3d.com/jonas/WebGL Benchmark/ >

File: Capture d’écran_2017-01-26_00-10-33.jpg (56KB, 552x680px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 552x680px

I won something ?

File: bench.png (332KB, 546x629px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 546x629px

Intel i5-5200u
Geforce 920M
Memefox
Antergos - Kernel 4.8
Mesa 13.0.3

File: k.png (495KB, 567x671px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 567x671px

4690k @ 4.5 ghz
R9 290X 8gb
latest opera
windows 7

File: firefox_2017-01-26_01-33-14.png (482KB, 586x712px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 586x712px

i7-6700 @ 3.4 ghz
RX 480 4gb
firefox 50.1
win 7

File: 1481962486652.png (315KB, 590x681px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 590x681px

Intel i3-550 @ 3.20GHz
RX 470
Firefox 50.1
Linux 4.8.14-zen
amdgpu-pro 16.30

File: Screenshot_2017-01-26-10-51-40-0296555835.png (84KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1080x1920px

>>58654290
Oh

File: wat.jpg (269KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1920x1200px

3570K @ 4.2GHz
GTX 970
Latest Chrome
Windows 7 x64 SP1

File: Skjermbilde.jpg (70KB, 578x662px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 578x662px

i3 6100
sapphhire rx 480 4gGB nitro
8GB 2133 Mhz kingston hyperx fury

File: test.jpg (496KB, 1281x726px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1281x726px

>i5 4670k
>GTX 770
>Chrome
>Windows 10

just botnet the fuck out of me senpai

File: Capture.png (316KB, 615x686px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 615x686px

>>58654290

File: shit.jpg (154KB, 1583x698px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1583x698px

What is this garbage benchmark?

Left Chromium, right Chrome

6600k
1070

Makes no sense

File: 2017-01-25-17:43:11-screenshot.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>58654290
intel 6850k
nvidia 1080

File: IMG_20170126_014556.jpg (2MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x3120px

Hd5650m, i5 450m
R600 driver
Archlinux x64
WebKit browser

File: 4L_hQf3zQQs.png (128KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 640x1136px

Since it's beta and shit on mobile, one of the boxes unchecked itself so I didn't get an overall score.

That said, it's not terrible for an iPhone SE

File: Screenshot_20170125-184857~2.png (167KB, 941x881px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 941x881px

Nexus 6P

File: unity_bench.png (553KB, 684x704px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 684x704px

QX6700 2.93Ghz
GTX 660ti
Waterfox 50.1.0
Windows 7

File: Screenshot_20170126-015429.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

>>58655760
Same with FF

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-26 01:56:05.png (451KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1366x768px

>>58654290

>>58655857
>taking a picture of the screen
>and then taking a screenshot of the picture

is this bait?

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-26 01:57:26.png (48KB, 737x503px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 737x503px

>>58655914

File: heh.jpg (86KB, 704x831px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 704x831px

>>58654290
A10 5800K
8GB RAM DDR3
RX 480 8GB
Firecucks

>>58655930
Poor upload, too tired to crop and resize, using clover

File: Screenshot_2017-01-25_20-01-25.png (269KB, 570x682px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 570x682px

i7-4710HQ
GTX 860m
Chromium 55.0.2883.87
Jewbuntu 16.04

File: 390Fury.png (663KB, 1157x662px) Image search: [Google]

663KB, 1157x662px

i5 4690
16 GB 2133
Latest Opera
W8.1
16.12.1 ReLive drivers

File: unibench.jpg (64KB, 486x477px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 486x477px

Athlon II X3 460
Ati Radeon HD5670
Opera 42.0.2393.137
Windows 10

Didn't let me run "Particles" so no overall score

File: benchmarks.png (386KB, 732x701px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 732x701px

>>58654290
i5 4570k
gtx760sc
firefox 51.0
linux 4.9.0

>>58656032
4670k*

I'm going to assume GPU matters far far less then the CPU in this?

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-25 at 5.15.10 PM.png (1MB, 1120x1300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1120x1300px

Chrome, Mid 2015 Macbook Pro so i7 4770hq and whatever graphics it has on board

>>58655230
no fucking way, this is your build with a 3770k >>58655404

File: huh.png (944KB, 1292x816px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1292x816px

Kinda BS benchmark...

my results on Firefox were with a ton of tabs open, and a game running at the start of the bench.

the chrome results were with everything closed...

I7 4790k
1080 vga

File: 2017-01-25-202404_3200x900_scrot.png (281KB, 1600x865px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1600x865px

Whoa!
So this is the power of WebGL?

>>58655230
>over 7 million gpu score with a 970

yeah ok buddy either show us what you can really do in photoshop or give a pic of those SLI titans

File: Captureewrer.png (366KB, 546x650px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 546x650px

6700k and Fury X.

>>58656288
how is it bullshit?
>firefox does better = benchmark is bullshit

File: Untitled.png (416KB, 578x693px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 578x693px

>>58654290

>>58656346
>>58656425

6700k with little OC
480 G1 8gb

>>58656386
No because then you're benchmarking the browser rather than the hardware.

File: Screenshot_20170125_205206.png (333KB, 579x663px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 579x663px

Wow, this demo is pretty impressive. Why couldn't we have this ten years ago instead of fucking Shockwave?

Athlon 845
RX 460
Linux 4.9, Mesa + AMDGPU
Firefox 50

File: Caasdasdpture.png (327KB, 582x667px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 582x667px

>>58656346
Forgot to dial in overclocks
new scores

File: benchmark.jpg (700KB, 1200x732px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 1200x732px

>>58654290
Firefox definitely performs better than Chromium in this benchmark

Pentium D
GT 610
Chromium 55.0.2883.75 on left, Firefox 45.7.0 on right
Debian 8.7
Nouveau probably

>>58656607
Pentium D 930@3GHz

File: ss (2017-01-25 at 08.56.42).jpg (158KB, 617x686px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 617x686px

2500k @ 4.5GHz
r9 290 stock
Chrome whatever latest version is
Windows 10

>~35% slower than 1070+i7 builds
huh, neat, guess I'll wait another year to upgrade

File: Screenshot at 2017-01-25 17-56-21.png (440KB, 1366x720px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1366x720px

Dell Inspiron 1121/M101z laptop running Fedora 25.

Posting the screenfetch in my next post

>>58656627

air cooled? I have a Pentium D 950 I want to get a new motherboard for so I can overclock it and have more than 4GB of RAM.

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-23 19-43-19.png (106KB, 717x409px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 717x409px

>>58656647

Do I win anything for my manly low score?

>>58656668
I'm running aircooled yeah. I just replaced a Pentium HT of some kind with it in an XPS 400. I figured the cooling was beefy enough for it.

Water cooling would probably be a good idea for the 950 since it's got a TDP of 130w.

>>58656682

I'm gonna test it on my other machines... a Dell mini1012 netbook and a Gateway ZX4300

>>58656682
Somebody has to do this on a Pentium 2 or something and post the score.

File: gateway_zx4300_webgl_benchmark.png (211KB, 554x667px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 554x667px

>>58656728

Gateway ZX4300 all-in-one
AMD Athlon II X2 235e
4GB RAM
Radeon HD4200 (mobile)
Win7

File: Screenshot_5.png (255KB, 555x671px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 555x671px

I have no clue if this is good.
i5 4690K @ 4.2GHz
GTX 1070
Latest Firefox
Windows 8.1

File: Screenshot_20170126-092135~2.png (223KB, 919x1087px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 919x1087px

Snapdragon 650 aka Xiaomi Redmi Note 3

File: Capture.png (283KB, 602x654px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 602x654px

>>58656809
i5 3570k @ 4.2
GTX 1070
chrome
win10

wtf

It froze my computer during the Animation and Skinning part, so let's assume a low score.
>Specs:
Pentium-T4300 @ 2.1ghz
Mesa GM45 Integrated Graphics
GNU IceCat
Antergos Linux with 4.8.13 kernel

>>58656969
> T4300
No fucking way, I thought I was the only with one of those, but it's a 4500. Not much different if you ask me.

File: bench.png (399KB, 560x663px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 560x663px

windows 10 enterprise 64bit
Firefox 51.0 64bit
i5 4690k @ 4ghz
RX 480 8gb

File: Capture.png (258KB, 555x663px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 555x663px

>>58656909
same setup but with edge

chromefags btfo

File: mehd.jpg (617KB, 3840x1080px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 3840x1080px

Did it while running Orcs Must Die 2.

FX8350
GTX 980Ti
Edge because Firefox was giving out of memory error for the test
Windows 10

File: 3uggZdy.png (2MB, 3840x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x1080px

Firefox vs Chrome
lel

>>58656996
It's an HP pavilion g60. I've had it for about 10 years now, and since it still works, I use it sometimes. The battery is dead though and it doesn't charge. I'm waiting for my new laptop to arrive, then I'll probably retire this laptop, but keep it around as a collector's item or whatever.

File: 1484853856051.png (302KB, 584x671px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 584x671px

i5 3570K 3.4
RX 480
Chrome
Win 10

File: Screenshot_20170125_184216.png (696KB, 1301x737px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 1301x737px

ArchLinux
Chromium 55
Xeon E5-1650v4 @ 4GHz
Old ass Sapphire HD 6850

File: mini1012_webgl_benchmark.png (577KB, 1366x738px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1366x738px

>>58656767
>>58656728

Not a Pentium II but an old Intel Atom.

Dell Mini 1012 netbook
Intel Atom N450
2GB RAM
GMA 3150 GPU
Win7 Ultimate
Firefox

File: 1472609698299.png (476KB, 592x678px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 592x678px

>>58657125
Did this one with Microsoft Edge
WTF is hate chrome now!!!

>>58656969

doesn't make sense. My Atom w/on-board GPU got through the whole test. >>58657189

File: how'd i do.png (536KB, 1359x821px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1359x821px

>>58654290
i5 6500 (stock speed)
XFX RX 480 Black Edition 8Gb (stock factory)
Windows 10

What do these numbers even mean?

>>58656809
>>58656909
>>58657026
>>58657036
>>58657063
>RX 480 beating more expensiv/higher perf Nvidia cards
wut?

>>58657217
>>RX 480 beating more expensiv/higher perf Nvidia cards
Firefox forgot to put on the amd nerf

File: 2017-01-25 (2).png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Here's my score. Seems kinda low, OC'd my gpu a bit and my fx 8370 is OC'd to 4.4GHz with some other OC's.

>>58657207
It might have something to do with the fact that I was using IceCat, because after restarting the computer and opening the link in IceCat again, it said that WebGL wasn't supported in IceCat. I'll rerun the benchmark in Chromium to hopefully get some results.

File: 1467578494676.png (524KB, 598x670px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 598x670px

>>58657125
>>58657190
Also downloaded Firefox just for this.
Seems like microsoft wins once again. Checkmate anti-botnet fags

>>58657253
>>58657207
nope, got an error on startup in Chromium. I can't run the benchmarks right now, sorry. It was going to be a crappy score anyway.

File: Capture.png (287KB, 572x675px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 572x675px

>>58654290
i5 6500
RX 470
Chrome
Win 10

File: 1474584650982.png (1MB, 1252x736px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1252x736px

>>58657228
>nvidiots actually believe this

File: laptopbenchmarksscore.png (534KB, 619x675px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 619x675px

>>58654290

i7 3632qm
hd 7670m/intel hd 3000 (was using intel gpu i think)
Firefox 50.1
Windows 10

File: Untitled.png (21KB, 803x389px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 803x389px

>>58654290

>>58657288

just install Firefox and call it a day.

File: Screenshot_20170126-012223.jpg (242KB, 1421x1091px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1421x1091px

S7 Edge Exynos with Nougat 7.0

File: Screenshot_20170125-233804.png (336KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1080x1920px

OnePlus 3

File: Untitled.jpg (131KB, 565x656px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 565x656px

Not bad I think?
Intel i5 6500 3.20GHz
16gb ram
Z170-A motherboard
GTX 960
Windows 10
Firefox

File: Selection_20170126_05:49:06.png (223KB, 576x676px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 576x676px

AMD FX-6300
16 GiB RAM
AMD R9 380 4 GiB
Debian unstable, Chromium 55
Mesa 17 drivers

File: JY9unDE.png (366KB, 1050x727px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1050x727px

>>58654290

>>58658586
card is r9 280 by the way

File: benchmar.png (684KB, 1350x802px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1350x802px

i7 2700k @4.3ghz
GTX 980ti
Latest Chrome
Win 10 build 14393 (latest)

File: K7g0h9A.png (377KB, 597x676px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 597x676px

>>58658586
>>58658594
That was chrome, here is firefox

File: benchmar2.png (1MB, 1449x877px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1449x877px

>>58658610
With Firefox now, significant jump

File: Selection_020.png (242KB, 565x682px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 565x682px

i7-6700
GTX 1060 6GB
16GB DDR4 3200mHz
Firefox
Ubuntu 16.04
had 50 tabs opened when I did this test, pretty weird because I only got 56k on the first test but 2x more on a second attempt. Also had 92k on Chromium

>>58658610
>>58658675
Why so low? You're clearly running a better build than >>58657217 yet your score is less than half

File: Screenshot_20170125-223605.png (367KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 1440x2560px

Galaxy S7

File: Screenshot_20170126-083039.png (336KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 2560x1440px

>>58659291
HTC 10

>>58659108
Not sure. 980ti is only a 6GB card. Also, it's possible Unity doesn't play nice with older CPUs.

Also had a bunch of tabs and other stuff open, though I seriously doubt that would have affected my results that much.

File: 1463027459575.png (287KB, 551x650px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 551x650px

>>58654290
My 970 is sort of tired i bet.

File: webglresults.png (298KB, 560x667px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 560x667px

>>58654290
Xeon 1231 v3
16 GB 2133 MHz RAM
390X

>>58657217
wtf, your gpu scored 4 times as high as my 390X
>>58659804
... kinda weird

File: chrome_2017-01-26_09-03-18.png (1MB, 1283x725px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1283x725px

>>58654290
FX-8350, 8GB DDR3, GTX 1050 Ti.

File: Captura.png (1MB, 1680x739px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x739px

i5-6600
gtx "meme" 1060

File: tmp_26951-Screenshot_20170126-0204391438327650.png (262KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1440x2560px

>>58654290
S7e

File: chrome_2017-01-26_09-08-23.png (619KB, 1273x716px) Image search: [Google]

619KB, 1273x716px

This test seems really inconsistent...

File: .png (366KB, 587x672px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 587x672px

GeForce GTX 1080
Intel Core i7-6800K
Firefox Dev edition, 52.0a2
windows 7

>>58659855
Oh and forgot

i7-6700K
GTX 1080
16 GB 2133MHz
Chrome

File: Screenshot_20170126-091130_1.jpg (173KB, 1330x1576px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1330x1576px

>>58654290

Same phone as
>>58659674
Firefox Beta. There were some graphical glitches though

File: webglresultsEdge.png (326KB, 553x654px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 553x654px

>>58659804
Same machine, but Edge

File: ss+(2017-01-26+at+09.12.51).png (362KB, 571x665px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 571x665px

>>58654290

i5 2500k @ 3.3GHz
R9 390 Strix (factor oc)
Debian/sid
Firefox 45.6 ESR
OpenGL 3.0 Mesa 17.0.0-devel (git-ddd27ef462)

>>58659908
>firefox esr
Why do they don't upgrade it?

>>58659925
It's mostly a debian thing to stick with ESR versions, and I for the most part don't care for the "updates".

>>58659968
But the normal firefox works so much better...
(I uninstalled esr on my "debian")

File: ss+(2017-01-26+at+09.35.11).png (207KB, 545x660px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 545x660px

>>58660018
To each their own. I can confirm though that the latest FF does perform better in these benches, pic related

File: whatever.jpg (201KB, 1284x724px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1284x724px

[email protected]
GTX1070@2100Mhz
Chrome blah blah
Win 7

This benchmark doesn't make any sense.

>>58654290

* First the website tells me I got no WebGL
* Tells me to install firefox which I am already running.
* Proceeds to load (?).
* Tells me I'm out of memory, which I'm not by a big margin.

Nice web """standards'''''' you got there, anon!

>>58660129
You're the only one here with this problem.

File: Screenshot_20170126-101319.png (328KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 2560x1440px

Galaxy s6

File: Screenshot (876).png (410KB, 569x619px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 569x619px

FX 4170
RX 480
Firefox whatever
Win10
Over 300 tabs open in this this instance of firefox. I'll close it and see what I get.

File: Screenshot (880).png (2MB, 2732x768px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2732x768px

>>58660288
Well that's a bit better now then.

File: webglbench.png (268KB, 553x663px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 553x663px

>>58654290
i7-4770 running at about 60% load due to boinc
GTX1060
Windows 10

File: yay.png (289KB, 588x684px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 588x684px

i5 6600k, gtx 770, chrome, win10

People averaging at 100,000. Best nvidia gets 160,000
>>58657217
Second best on /g/, 320,000, an XFX RX 480 Black Edition with a upper mid range CPU from two years ago.
>>58660782
Best on /g/, a shithouse at the time 5 year old CPU, with another fucking RX 480, XFX, 8GB standard edition.
And it gets 3.6 million.

File: Chrome-Edge.jpg (169KB, 1256x668px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1256x668px

>>58654290
i7-2600
GT640
Windows 10

>>58660860
This "benchmark" is bizarre

File: Dope.png (260KB, 550x650px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 550x650px

>>58654290
i5- 3450
GTX-660
firefox 51.0
windows 10

>>58660907
You just need to GIT GUD

>>58660782
What the fuck?

File: Zrzut ekranu z 2017-01-26 11-57-30.png (825KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 1920x1080px

>>58654290
so this is the power of chromium?

File: wat.png (413KB, 575x659px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 575x659px

Intel i7 Skylake 6700 non-k
EVGA 970 AAC(?)
16gb ddr 2333
Sandicks 128gb SSD

How's that 3.5gb now, faggots?

>>58660984
gtx760/i5 4670(non k) on ubuntu 16.04 btw.

>>58660987
oh, firefox 50.1.0.6186 and win10.

File: Zrzut ekranu z 2017-01-26 12-08-36.png (438KB, 928x1056px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 928x1056px

>>58660984
>>58660999
redoing firefox without some background things that were running does not improve the score that much i guess.

File: gg.jpg (121KB, 649x745px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 649x745px

i5 6400 @ 4.5 Ghz
GTX 1060 3GB
16 GB (8 x 2) 2666 Mhz DDR4
Win10 x64

File: ss (2017-01-26 at 01.23.06).png (609KB, 1214x954px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1214x954px

>>58654290
Except my 2500K is overclocked to 4.8 GHz. Not sure why it doesn't show in Speccy.

File: chrome_2017-01-26_12-40-21.png (1MB, 1273x715px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1273x715px

3770k
980ti
16gb ram

chrome with billions of tabs open

And what is this benchmark for really?

>>58661247
like every other benchmark ever

dick waving contest

>>58661256
why would someone care tho, unity is a shit engine anyway lol

only thing i do on my pc is play league and watch chineese cartoons

>>58661262
>why would someone care tho,
welcome to /g/

File: Screenshot_20170126_115357.png (719KB, 1279x723px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 1279x723px

i5 4460
280x
Running it over firefox on a slightly dated Manjaro KDE live dvd with open source drivers
Kernel still 4.4.41-1

File: unity benchmark.png (688KB, 1294x730px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 1294x730px

i7-2600K
ASUS ROG Strix 1080
16GB DDR3

Maybe I got cucked by Nvidia or my processor is obsolete. Upgrade is imminent in near future.

>>58661360
Also chrome with zillion tab.

Doesn't run on opera 12.16
Ubuntu 16.04
i7-4600u
16gb

File: Screen Shot 1.png (517KB, 630x691px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 630x691px

>>58661331
And now over chrome on hackintosh. Man, that's sort of substantial.

File: Windows_10_Capture.png (505KB, 579x669px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 579x669px

>>58654290
Athlon X4 880k
GTX 750 ti
latest Chrome
Windows 10

might get Intel cpu to go more botnet

File: bull.png (480KB, 570x666px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 570x666px

>>58661397
Chrome on Windows 10....

>>58661432
redid the benchmark after closing a bunch of shit, got better scores for the first half, and then dropped some performance in the physics and ai ones
fuck

File: Screenshot (884).png (2MB, 2732x768px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2732x768px

>>58660782
Bit better maldebrot now.

File: memes.png (1MB, 1313x743px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1313x743px

x5650 3.8Ghz
gtx1060
chrome latest

did i do good senpai?

File: meh.png (495KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1280x720px

Firefox 50.1.0
Windows 10
3570k @ 4.5GHz
GTX 1080

I feel this score is oddly low.

File: yoga14.jpg (310KB, 1920x1046px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1920x1046px

work laptop
Chrome 55

>>58661697
>specs because I don't wanna be a cunt
win 8
i5-5200U
Nvidia GeForce GT 840M (2GB GDDR5); Intel HD Graphics 5500 (idk which it used and I'm lazy so there's that)

File: Screenshot_2017-01-26-07-00-29-1.png (217KB, 860x1025px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 860x1025px

>>58660284
Galaxy S5
Firefox
Marshmallow 6.0.1

File: unity.png (390KB, 555x675px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 555x675px

>>58654290
fx4100
r7 260x
8gb 1066mhz ddr3
windows 10
waterfox, it wouldn't work on chrome canary

File: 2017-01-26 15_54_44-Greenshot.png (103KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1280x1024px

>>58654290
E4300
HD5450
Pale Moon
Windows 7

File: 2017-01-26 16_00_52-Unity WebGL Benchmarks - Pale Moon.png (436KB, 569x681px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 569x681px

>>58662218
Blog update, it worked after 10 refreshes.

File: instantating.png (392KB, 1348x761px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1348x761px

>Instantating

Closed the tab quicker than a jew picking up a penny

File: FirefoxDeveloper.png (393KB, 523x626px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 523x626px

6600k to 4.6ghz
970 to ~1.5ghz
8gb 2133
win 10
Also ran on chrome 55 but every benchmark was like 30-40% worse.

File: Untitled-2.jpg (151KB, 571x686px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 571x686px

2600k @ 4.5Ghz
1060 3GB

File: unity benchmarks.png (368KB, 463x557px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 463x557px

Running on an Acer Aspire One 722.
Specs:
>AMD C-60 @ 1GHz
>Integrated Radeon HD 6290 graphics
>4GB DDR3 @ 539 MHz
>Windows 7
>Chrome 55

File: 2017-01-26-124857_1366x768_scrot.png (477KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1366x768px

>>58657288
Finally finished the benchmarking.
Specs are shown in >>58656969
Using Chromium instead of IceCat.

File: Screenshot at 2017-01-26 11-44-39.jpg (158KB, 1301x921px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1301x921px

~8 year old laptop with:
Intel P8800
Intel 4500MHD
Pale Meme 26.5
Mesa 13.0.3
Old build of Linux 4.6
A shitload of tabs open

I was about to try to compete for the lowest score, but then I saw >>58664497

Also, tried in chromium, but it fails to load with a JavaScript error.

I find it hilarious how 2 year old middle range nvidia gpus beat the shit out of today's best AMD gpus.

Chromium (ungoogled): 102280
Firefox 5.1 64-bit: 127865
Edge 38.14393.0.0: 120774

8350 @ 4.6ghz
970@ 1556core/2001mem
8GB ddr3 @ 2133/cl9
win10 64bit

Interestingly enough, edge had higher gpu scores than firefox yet firefox had higher physics scores than edge.

File: Captura.png (338KB, 681x697px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 681x697px

Versión 55.0.2883.87 m (64-bit)

AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
5.5 gbs ram ddr2
Radeon HD 7770
Windows10

>>58664824
Chrome obviously

>>58664841
jewcuck

File: chrome_2017-01-26_21-36-51.png (12KB, 452x225px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 452x225px

why am I getting this shit

File: Unity-WebGL.png (383KB, 1126x797px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1126x797px

Ubongo 16.04
GTX Cuck70
Xeon 1231v3
16GB RAM

File: Ubuntu btfo.jpg (81KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 800x600px

>Ubuntu vs Win7

Lel...

>>58665833
deactivate you script-blocker.

File: Capture.png (608KB, 1284x722px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 1284x722px

>>58656630
yay
>4570
>r9 290 stock

Looks like the Mandelbrot GPU benchmark really skews the results

File: Untitled.png (768KB, 1294x732px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 1294x732px

lmfao can't believe I have the high score

Windows 10
i7 6700 (not K)
GTX 1080
Chrome 55.0.2883.87 m (64-bit)
latest nvidia drivers

File: benchy.png (325KB, 760x718px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 760x718px

Did I do good?

File: 1ogm3pi.png (337KB, 624x703px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 624x703px

hey thats pretty good

>>58666805
tfw I don't have the high score so nvm

>>58666805
see
>>58666710

>>58655230
I have that exact same build but got a 42750

File: Untitled9.png (506KB, 610x687px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 610x687px

4690k stock
GTX 1070
Chrome 55
Windows 10

File: UnityBenchmark123456987.jpg (323KB, 609x669px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 609x669px

>>58654290

*** ThinkPad P50
** Xeon E3-1505M v5
** M2000M Quadro
** Windows 10
** FF DE: 52.0a2

File: bench.png (277KB, 594x693px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 594x693px

i7 950
GTX 970
Linux 4.8
Nvidia's binary blob 375.26
Chromium 55.0.2883.87

File: memes.png (447KB, 718x842px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 718x842px

i5-5300U
GeForce 940M
Firefox 51.0
Windows 10 1607

File: win10-xubuntu1604.png (633KB, 1080x649px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 1080x649px

i5 4460
GTX 1060 (376.33 win10, 367.57 xubuntu)
Firefox 50.1
Windows 10 on left. Xubuntu 16.04 on right

File: memes.png (480KB, 721x838px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 721x838px

>>58667521
now with MS Edge

File: screenshot_2.jpg (111KB, 545x655px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 545x655px

>>58654290
so I win at being a very average gaming pc?

>>58667633
You fucked something up. My MS edge did better than firefox.

File: firefox.jpg (467KB, 2186x774px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 2186x774px

I was bored, so why not try on a few browsers.

File: Untitled-2.jpg (575KB, 1159x900px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 1159x900px

hmmm

File: Capture.jpg (156KB, 1277x951px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1277x951px

fx 8320,gtx 750ti 8gbram cyberfoxamd

File: 2017-01-26_584x664_scrot.png (257KB, 584x664px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 584x664px

>>58654290
i5-4690k
GTX 750
Chromium 54.0.2840.59 (64-bit)
Linux 4.4.26
Nvidia