I just installed this after people kept shilling it for the past

>>58640030
>implying you're not the same shill
>implying it's not placebo

>>58640085
I'm not the same shill. I don't use shitty ass linux.

>>58640101
sounds like something the shills would say

>>58640136
(You)

>>58640030
Why the fuck did you just tell the shills that their shilling worked on you? Now that just gives them incentive to keep doing it. Thanks a lot you fucking retard

>>58640030
good luck running netflix or youtube hd on it

that's funny because I just moved from waterfox to regular 32 bit firefox and it fixed a horrendous memory leak I had been dealing with for months

>it's 64 bit so it can use more memory
>let's use all of it!

>>58640030
Try this faggot.
http://fbuild.com/

anything is faster than regular firefox because its a dead project that was taken over by political activists.

brave is the new firefox, but better.

>>58642006
Can you customize the UI and use extensions on it?

It's not even close to being as fast as Chromium though

>browser is fast

What does this even mean anymore. I don't remember the last time I thought "man this website is loading slowly" where it wasn't due to internet issues.

I just want them to finish that fucking Servo thing so that the browser engine isn't stuck in 2007

and instead it'll be stuck in 2013

File: vivaldi-browser-logo.jpg (8KB, 370x259px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 370x259px

>>58640030
>2016 + 1
>not using vivaldi

>>58640030
I mean if you really want speed pale moon is the fastest I've found, pretty light weight too.

Speed isn't the only thing that makes a good browser experience though and it can be pretty restrictive

>>58644624
One of the slowest browsers you could use.

File: ew.gif (2MB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 380x285px

>>58640030
>keep seeing this on /g/
>see that it's hosted on github
>less than 500 stars

lol no.

I'll give it a try when it's reputable, until then I'm assuming it has backdoors in it. And no, I'm not going to read all that fucking source code.

>>58642212
firefox tards still have literal slow browsers
imagine a program running slower than an internet connection with a taiwanese manga translation forum, and you have firefox

Gecko is extremely slow compared to blink.

Not any compilation optimization is going to change that

>>58640030
Googel hangouts vidya calls never worked on that shit for me

>>58644624
I actually like Vivaldi

>>58644657
Not really that slow once it opens. It will only get better as it matures.

>use a browser that has been developed for nine years
>expect similar performance from a similar browser that's been out for under a year
>complain on a board with an "alternative" crowd that your young software isn't beating the old fart browser

>>58645574
I did side by side comparisons with other browsers, very fucking slow. By far slower than the 10 other browsers I compared it against.

>>58640030
Firefox is pretty fast on my machine. At least it's as fast as chrome. What makes your fox better than the original?

>>58642006
>brave
Fuck off, pajeet shill. Proprietary browsers are shit.

>>58640085
>implying ungoogled chromium is not placebo
>implying any ubuntu-based distros isn't placebo
>implying opera, based on chromium isn't placebo
>implying forks aren't placebo

>>58640030
I use Cyberfox. Everything else sucks by comparison.

>>58640085
He's not, I'm probably the shill he's talking about

>>58645691
64 bit, pocket and telemetry removed so it's a tad lighter, the Adobe DRM binary blob removed

>>58648092
All those can be disabled and firefox was 64bit for a long time now.